Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

과학철학

Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Reality of the Orbits of Particles

Zae-young Ghim

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Causal interpretation of quantum mechanics: The Schrodinger equation as a condition of stability

Nina B. Sotina

Abstract This work presents a further development of causal interpretation of quantum mechanics. Existence of ‘non-local hidden variables’ like a physical field is taken as an assumption. Under this assumption, on the basis of the causal approach it is proven that Schrödinger equation is a necessary condition for stability of the motion of a particle. For the case of a hydrogen atom this approach gives a mathematical base with which to suggest that (1) the electron’s spin in an atom is precessing; (2) the energy of the precessional motion on Bohr orbits satisfies the Rydberg formula, and (3) structures are formed in the physical vacuum which stabilize the motion of an electron on Bohr orbits.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2019•0 citations

The Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Saul T. Epstein

Physical Review•Jan 1, 1953•21 citations

On the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics

Yu. P. Rybakov

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 1974•17 citations

Possible test of the reality of superluminal phase waves and particle phase space motions in the Einstein-de Broglie-Bohm causal stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics

Jean Pierre Vigier

Foundations of Physics•Jan 1, 1994•9 citations

Calculations in the Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Christopher Dewdney

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1987•5 citations

Causal particle trajectories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics: J.-P. Vigier, C. Dewdney, P. R. Holland and A. Kyprianidis

Basil J. Hiley, F. David Peat

In relation to this debate perhaps the greatest significance and contribution of Bohm's causal interpretation of quantum mechanics 3 is that it not only exposes the arbitrary philosophical assumptions underlying the claims of the Copenhagen interpretation but also brings into relief the essentially new content of quantum mechanics, which is reflected in different ways in Bohr's interpretation. Indeed the claim that the quantum formalism itself requires us not only to abandon the quest for explanation of quantum phenomena but also the concepts of causality, continuity and the objective reality of individual micro-objects, is shown to be false. However the existence of the single counter-interpretation proposed by Bohm constitutes sufficient grounds for rejecting the absolute and final necessity of complementary description and indeterminacy, along with the inherent unanalysable and closed nature of quantum phenomena.

Routledge eBooks•Jun 25, 2012•0 citations
Abstract This work presents a further development of causal interpretation of quantum mechanics. Existence of ‘non-local hidden variables’ like a physical field is taken as an assumption. Under this assumption, on the basis of the causal approach it is proven that Schrödinger equation is a necessary condition for stability of the motion of a particle. For the case of a hydrogen atom this approach gives a mathematical base with which to suggest that (1) the electron’s spin in an atom is precessing; (2) the energy of the precessional motion on Bohr orbits satisfies the Rydberg formula, and (3) structures are formed in the physical vacuum which stabilize the motion of an electron on Bohr orbits.
In relation to this debate perhaps the greatest significance and contribution of Bohm's causal interpretation of quantum mechanics 3 is that it not only exposes the arbitrary philosophical assumptions underlying the claims of the Copenhagen interpretation but also brings into relief the essentially new content of quantum mechanics, which is reflected in different ways in Bohr's interpretation. Indeed the claim that the quantum formalism itself requires us not only to abandon the quest for explanation of quantum phenomena but also the concepts of causality, continuity and the objective reality of individual micro-objects, is shown to be false. However the existence of the single counter-interpretation proposed by Bohm constitutes sufficient grounds for rejecting the absolute and final necessity of complementary description and indeterminacy, along with the inherent unanalysable and closed nature of quantum phenomena.