Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Open Systems & Information Dynamics

Rotation Gates with Controlled Adiabatic Evolutions in Open Systems

Abderrahim Benmachiche, Derradji Bahloul, Gharib S. Mahmoud, Azeddine Messikh

Published Sep 1, 2018• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Single quantum rotation gates can be perfectly implemented in a closed system using the controlled adiabatic evolutions process proposed by Itay Hen that may lead to build some quantum circuit blocks [Phys. Rev. A, 022309 (2015)]. These adiabatic evolutions yield to vanishing geometric phases. In this work, we extended Itay’s work by considering a more realistic model where the qubits are subjected to decoherence effects during the adiabatic evolution process. We demonstrate that, in the case of an open system, the decoherence leads to nonvanishing geometric phases and drastically reduces the performance of the quantum rotation gates bellow the fidelity target (0.999).

DOI
10.1142/s1230161218500130

Related papers

Generation of elementary gates and Bell’s states using controlled adiabatic evolutions

Abderrahim Benmachiche, Sellami Ali, Sherzod Turaev +3 more

Fundamental quantum gates can be implemented effectively using adiabatic quantum computation or circuit model. Recently, Hen combined the two approaches to introduce a new model called controlled adiabatic evolutions [I. Hen, Phys. Rev. A, 91(2) (2015) 022309]. This model was specifically designed to implement one and two-qubit controlled gates. Later, Santos extended Hen’s work to implement [Formula: see text]-qubit controlled gates [A. C. Santos and M. S. Sarandy, Sci. Rep., 5 (2015) 15775]. In this paper, we discuss the implementation of each of the usual quantum gates, as well as demonstrate the possibility of preparing Bell’s states using the controlled adiabatic evolutions approach. We conclude by presenting the fidelity results of implementing single quantum gates and Bell’s states in open systems.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Apr 1, 2019•1 citation

Implementation Of Quantum Rotation Gates Using Controlled Non-Adiabatic Evolutions

Abdelrahman A. H. Abdelrahim, Gharib S. Mahmoud, Sherzod Turaev +1 more

Quantum gates are the basic building blocks in the quantum circuits model. These gates can be implemented using adiabatic or non adiabatic processes. Adiabatic models can be controlled using auxiliary qubits, whereas non adiabatic models can be simplified by using one single-shot implementation. In this paper, the controlled adiabatic evolutions is combined with the single-shot implementation to obtain quantum gates with controlled non adiabatic evolutions. This is an important improvement which can speed the implementation of quantum gates and reduce the errors due to the long run in the adiabatic model. The robustness of our scheme to different types of errors is also investigated.

•Jan 29, 2018•0 citations

Quantum rotation gates with controlled nonadiabatic evolutions

Abdelrahman A. H. Abdelrahim, Abderrahim Benmachiche, Gharib S. Mahmoud +1 more

Abstract Quantum gates can be implemented adiabatically and nonadiabatically. Many schemes used at least two sequentially implemented gates to obtain an arbitrary one-qubit gate. Recently, it has been shown that nonadiabatic gates can be realized by single-shot implementation. It has also been shown that quantum gates can be implemented with controlled adiabatic evolutions. In this paper, we combine the advantage of single-shot implementation with controlled adiabatic evolutions to obtain controlled nonadiabatic evolutions. We also investigate the robustness to different types of errors. We find that the fidelity is close to unity for realistic decoherence rates.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Feb 14, 2018•0 citations

Quantum state preparation by adiabatic evolution with custom gates

E. A. Coello Pérez, Joey Bonitati, Dean Lee +2 more

Quantum state preparation by adiabatic evolution is currently rendered ineffective by the long implementation times of the underlying quantum circuits, comparable to the decoherence time of present and near-term quantum devices. These implementation times can be significantly reduced by realizing these circuits with custom gates. Using classical computing, we model the output of a realistic two-qubit processor implementing the adiabatic evolution of a two-spin system by means of custom gates. This modeled output is then compared with the results of quantum simulations solving the same problem on IBM Quantum (IBMQ) systems. When used to emulate the behavior of the IBMQ quantum circuit, our realistic model yields state fidelities ranging from 65% to 85%, similar to the actual performance of a diverse set of IBMQ devices. When we reduced the implementation time by using custom gates, however, the loss of fidelity was reduced by at least a factor of 4, allowing us to accurately extract the energy of the target state. This improvement is enough to render adiabatic evolution useful for quantum state preparation for small systems or as a preconditioner for other state preparation methods.

arXiv:2111.12207•Physical Review A•Mar 2, 2022•23 citations

Effect of dephasing on single-qubit rotation gates

Youssouf Hamidou Issoufa, Azeddine Messikh

In this paper we investigate the effect of dephasing on the performance of the quantum rotation gate implemented by adiabatic passage and static laser pulses proposed in Lacour et al (2006 Opt. Commun. 264 362). We show that in an open system, where the three-level lambda system is subjected to dephasing of its ground states, the dephasing will introduce additional dynamic phases which cannot be recompensated as in the closed system. We analyse the evolution of the population by using the quantum jump approach. The results are obtained assuming realistic dephasing rates Γ0 1

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Oct 22, 2010•5 citations

Geometric phases in open tripod systems

Ditte Møller, Lars Bojer Madsen, Klaus Mølmer

We first consider stimulated Raman adiabatic passages in a closed four-level tripod system. In this case, the adiabatic eigenstates of the system acquire real geometric phases. When the system is open and subject to decoherence they acquire complex geometric phases that we determine by a Monte Carlo wave function approach. We calculate the geometric phases and the state evolution in the closed as well as in the open system cases and describe the deviation between these in terms of the phases acquired. When the system is closed, the adiabatic evolution implements a Hadamard gate. The open system implements an imperfect gate and hence has a fidelity below unity. We express this fidelity in terms of the acquired geometric phases.

arXiv:0710.0450•Physical Review A•Feb 6, 2008•40 citations
Single quantum rotation gates can be perfectly implemented in a closed system using the controlled adiabatic evolutions process proposed by Itay Hen that may lead to build some quantum circuit blocks [Phys. Rev. A, 022309 (2015)]. These adiabatic evolutions yield to vanishing geometric phases. In this work, we extended Itay’s work by considering a more realistic model where the qubits are subjected to decoherence effects during the adiabatic evolution process. We demonstrate that, in the case of an open system, the decoherence leads to nonvanishing geometric phases and drastically reduces the performance of the quantum rotation gates bellow the fidelity target (0.999).
Fundamental quantum gates can be implemented effectively using adiabatic quantum computation or circuit model. Recently, Hen combined the two approaches to introduce a new model called controlled adiabatic evolutions [I. Hen, Phys. Rev. A, 91(2) (2015) 022309]. This model was specifically designed to implement one and two-qubit controlled gates. Later, Santos extended Hen’s work to implement [Formula: see text]-qubit controlled gates [A. C. Santos and M. S. Sarandy, Sci. Rep., 5 (2015) 15775]. In this paper, we discuss the implementation of each of the usual quantum gates, as well as demonstrate the possibility of preparing Bell’s states using the controlled adiabatic evolutions approach. We conclude by presenting the fidelity results of implementing single quantum gates and Bell’s states in open systems.
Quantum gates are the basic building blocks in the quantum circuits model. These gates can be implemented using adiabatic or non adiabatic processes. Adiabatic models can be controlled using auxiliary qubits, whereas non adiabatic models can be simplified by using one single-shot implementation. In this paper, the controlled adiabatic evolutions is combined with the single-shot implementation to obtain quantum gates with controlled non adiabatic evolutions. This is an important improvement which can speed the implementation of quantum gates and reduce the errors due to the long run in the adiabatic model. The robustness of our scheme to different types of errors is also investigated.
Abstract Quantum gates can be implemented adiabatically and nonadiabatically. Many schemes used at least two sequentially implemented gates to obtain an arbitrary one-qubit gate. Recently, it has been shown that nonadiabatic gates can be realized by single-shot implementation. It has also been shown that quantum gates can be implemented with controlled adiabatic evolutions. In this paper, we combine the advantage of single-shot implementation with controlled adiabatic evolutions to obtain controlled nonadiabatic evolutions. We also investigate the robustness to different types of errors. We find that the fidelity is close to unity for realistic decoherence rates.
Quantum state preparation by adiabatic evolution is currently rendered ineffective by the long implementation times of the underlying quantum circuits, comparable to the decoherence time of present and near-term quantum devices. These implementation times can be significantly reduced by realizing these circuits with custom gates. Using classical computing, we model the output of a realistic two-qubit processor implementing the adiabatic evolution of a two-spin system by means of custom gates. This modeled output is then compared with the results of quantum simulations solving the same problem on IBM Quantum (IBMQ) systems. When used to emulate the behavior of the IBMQ quantum circuit, our realistic model yields state fidelities ranging from 65% to 85%, similar to the actual performance of a diverse set of IBMQ devices. When we reduced the implementation time by using custom gates, however, the loss of fidelity was reduced by at least a factor of 4, allowing us to accurately extract the energy of the target state. This improvement is enough to render adiabatic evolution useful for quantum state preparation for small systems or as a preconditioner for other state preparation methods.
In this paper we investigate the effect of dephasing on the performance of the quantum rotation gate implemented by adiabatic passage and static laser pulses proposed in Lacour et al (2006 Opt. Commun. 264 362). We show that in an open system, where the three-level lambda system is subjected to dephasing of its ground states, the dephasing will introduce additional dynamic phases which cannot be recompensated as in the closed system. We analyse the evolution of the population by using the quantum jump approach. The results are obtained assuming realistic dephasing rates Γ0 1
We first consider stimulated Raman adiabatic passages in a closed four-level tripod system. In this case, the adiabatic eigenstates of the system acquire real geometric phases. When the system is open and subject to decoherence they acquire complex geometric phases that we determine by a Monte Carlo wave function approach. We calculate the geometric phases and the state evolution in the closed as well as in the open system cases and describe the deviation between these in terms of the phases acquired. When the system is closed, the adiabatic evolution implements a Hadamard gate. The open system implements an imperfect gate and hence has a fidelity below unity. We express this fidelity in terms of the acquired geometric phases.