Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Modern Physics Letters A

Contextuality of a two-qubit state in 4-cycle measurement scenarios

Hui-Xian Meng, Wenhua Wang, Jie Zhou, Jing‐Ling Chen

Published Oct 30, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We introduce a quantity of contextuality, i.e. the maximum contextuality of a two-qubit state in 4-cycle measurement scenarios, to study quantum contextuality of two-qubit states for the 4-cycle noncontextual inequalities. Subsequently, we prove several appealing features of this quantity of contextuality, including the faithfulness, the boundedness, the invariance under unitary operations and the convexity. Remarkably, for arbitrary two-qubit state, we reformulate this quantity of contextuality analytically by eigenvalues of the state. Therefore, in 4-cycle measurement scenarios, we establish an efficient way to distinguish two-qubit states that can reveal contextuality from ones that cannot.

DOI
10.1142/s0217732318502127

Related papers

Contextuality with Pauli observables in cycle scenarios

Choudhary, Raman, Rui Soares Barbosa

Contextuality is a fundamental marker of quantum non-classicality, which has emerged as a key resource for quantum computational advantage in multiple settings. Many such results hinge specifically on contextuality witnessed through Pauli measurements. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of (state-dependent) Pauli contextuality, focusing on cycle measurement scenarios, the simplest scenarios capable of exhibiting contextual behaviour. First, we study realizability of cycle scenarios with multi-qubit Pauli observables: we show that the maximum size of a cycle faithfully realizable by $m$-qubit Paulis is upper bounded by $3m$, while we construct explicit realizations of cycles of size $2m-1$ or $2m$, depending on whether $m \not\equiv 1 \pmod{3}$ or $m \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$. Then, we investigate the presence of contextuality: we prove that no $n$-cycle Pauli realization for $n > 4$ can witness contextuality (on any quantum state), whereas for $n = 4$ every Pauli realization exhibits contextuality, attaining the quantum bound for all noncontextuality inequalities on some pure state. Finally, we discuss arbitrary Pauli scenarios in light of Vorob'ev's theorem, and show that, contrary to what our cycle characterization might suggest, the presence of $4$-cycles is not necessary for witnessing contextuality in general Pauli scenarios.

arXiv:2502.03451•Feb 5, 2025•0 citations

Revealing quantum contextuality using a single measurement device

Jaskaran Singh, Rajendra Singh Bhati, Arvind

In this paper we analyze the notion of measurement noncontextuality (MNC) and identify contextual scenarios which involve sequential measurements of only a single measurement device. We show that any noncontextual ontological model fails to explain the statistics of outcomes of a single carefully constructed positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) executed sequentially on a quantum system. The context of measurement arises from the different configurations in which the device can be used. We develop an inequality from the noncontextual (NC) ontic model, and construct a quantum situation involving measurements from the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \check{g}\else \v{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. We show that the resultant statistics arising from this device violate our NC inequality. This device can be generalized by incorporating measurements from arbitrary $n$-cycle contextuality inequalities of which $n=5$ corresponds to the KCBS inequality. We show that the NC and quantum bounds for various scenarios can be derived more easily using only the functional relationships between the outcomes for larger values $n$. This makes it one of the simpler contextual inequalities to analyze.

arXiv:2102.00410•Physical Review A•Jan 3, 2023•5 citations

Demonstrating quantum contextuality of indistinguishable particles by a single family of noncontextuality inequalities

Hong-Yi Su, Jing-Ling Chen, Yeong-Cherng Liang

Quantum theory has the intriguing feature that is inconsistent with noncontextual hidden variable models, for which the outcome of a measurement does not depend on which other compatible measurements are being performed concurrently. While various proofs of such contextual behavior of quantum systems have been established, relatively little is known concerning the possibility to demonstrate this intriguing feature for indistinguishable particles. Here, we show in a simple and systematic manner that with projective measurements alone, it is possible to demonstrate quantum contextuality for such systems of arbitrary Hilbert space dimensions, including those corresponding to a qubit. Our demonstration is applicable to a single fermion as well as multiple fermions, and thus also a composite boson formed from an even number of fermions. In addition, our approach gives a clear demonstration of the intimate connection between complementarity and contextuality, two seemingly unrelated aspects of quantum theory.

arXiv:1407.1451•Scientific Reports•Jun 25, 2015•7 citations

Demonstrating quantum contextuality of indistinguishable particles by a single family of noncontextuality inequalities

Hong-Yi Su, Jing‐Ling Chen, Yeong-Cherng Liang

Quantum theory has the intriguing feature that is inconsistent with noncontextual hidden variable models, for which the outcome of a measurement does not depend on which other compatible measurements are being performed concurrently. While various proofs of such contextual behavior of quantum systems have been established, relatively little is known concerning the possibility to demonstrate this intriguing feature for indistinguishable particles. Here, we show in a simple and systematic manner that with projective measurements alone, it is possible to demonstrate quantum contextuality for such systems of arbitrary Hilbert space dimensions, including those corresponding to a qubit. Our demonstration is applicable to a single fermion as well as multiple fermions, and thus also a composite boson formed from an even number of fermions. In addition, our approach gives a clear demonstration of the intimate connection between complementarity and contextuality, two seemingly unrelated aspects of quantum theory.

•Jun 25, 2015•3 citations

Proposed experiments of qutrit state-independent contextuality and two-qutrit contextuality-based nonlocality

Adán Cabello, Elias Amselem, Kate Blanchfield +2 more

Recent experiments have demonstrated ququart state-independent quantum contextuality and qutrit state-dependent quantum contextuality. So far, the most basic form of quantum contextuality pointed out by Kochen and Specker, and Bell, has eluded experimental confirmation. Here we present an experimentally feasible test to observe qutrit state-independent quantum contextuality using single photons in a three-path setup. In addition, we show that if the same measurements are performed on two entangled qutrits, rather than sequentially on the same qutrit, then the noncontextual inequality becomes a Bell inequality. We show that this connection also applies to other recently introduced noncontextual inequalities.

arXiv:1203.0981•Physical Review A•Mar 5, 2012•37 citations

Qubit measurements for testing contextuality through the violation of Liang-Spekkens-Wiseman-Yu-Oh inequality

Meng Yan, Hao-Zhan Zou, Xiang Zhan

Abstract Contextuality is a striking feature of our nature predicted by quantum theory and tested by various experiments. In a qubit system, testing contextuality requires scenarios distinct from traditional ones for systems with dimension of three or greater. In this paper, we consider the noncontextuality inequality developed by Liang-Spekkens-Wiseman and Yu-Oh, and investigate the set of three qubit measurements that can be used to test and violate this inequality. Our numerical results show that two of the three measurements can be almost arbitrary. Moreover, we have singled out several extremely interesting sets of measurements, e.g. one measurements can be white noise while the other two are arbitrarily close to white noise. These sets fulfill our knowledge about contextuality in this minimum quantum system.

New Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 2023•0 citations
We introduce a quantity of contextuality, i.e. the maximum contextuality of a two-qubit state in 4-cycle measurement scenarios, to study quantum contextuality of two-qubit states for the 4-cycle noncontextual inequalities. Subsequently, we prove several appealing features of this quantity of contextuality, including the faithfulness, the boundedness, the invariance under unitary operations and the convexity. Remarkably, for arbitrary two-qubit state, we reformulate this quantity of contextuality analytically by eigenvalues of the state. Therefore, in 4-cycle measurement scenarios, we establish an efficient way to distinguish two-qubit states that can reveal contextuality from ones that cannot.
Contextuality is a fundamental marker of quantum non-classicality, which has emerged as a key resource for quantum computational advantage in multiple settings. Many such results hinge specifically on contextuality witnessed through Pauli measurements. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of (state-dependent) Pauli contextuality, focusing on cycle measurement scenarios, the simplest scenarios capable of exhibiting contextual behaviour. First, we study realizability of cycle scenarios with multi-qubit Pauli observables: we show that the maximum size of a cycle faithfully realizable by mmm-qubit Paulis is upper bounded by 3m3m3m, while we construct explicit realizations of cycles of size 2m−12m-12m−1 or 2m2m2m, depending on whether m≢1(mod3)m \not\equiv 1 \pmod{3}m≡1(mod3) or m≡1(mod3)m \equiv 1 \pmod{3}m≡1(mod3). Then, we investigate the presence of contextuality: we prove that no nnn-cycle Pauli realization for n>4n > 4n>4 can witness contextuality (on any quantum state), whereas for n=4n = 4n=4 every Pauli realization exhibits contextuality, attaining the quantum bound for all noncontextuality inequalities on some pure state. Finally, we discuss arbitrary Pauli scenarios in light of Vorob'ev's theorem, and show that, contrary to what our cycle characterization might suggest, the presence of 444-cycles is not necessary for witnessing contextuality in general Pauli scenarios.
In this paper we analyze the notion of measurement noncontextuality (MNC) and identify contextual scenarios which involve sequential measurements of only a single measurement device. We show that any noncontextual ontological model fails to explain the statistics of outcomes of a single carefully constructed positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) executed sequentially on a quantum system. The context of measurement arises from the different configurations in which the device can be used. We develop an inequality from the noncontextual (NC) ontic model, and construct a quantum situation involving measurements from the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \check{g}\else \v{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. We show that the resultant statistics arising from this device violate our NC inequality. This device can be generalized by incorporating measurements from arbitrary nnn-cycle contextuality inequalities of which n=5n=5n=5 corresponds to the KCBS inequality. We show that the NC and quantum bounds for various scenarios can be derived more easily using only the functional relationships between the outcomes for larger values nnn. This makes it one of the simpler contextual inequalities to analyze.
Quantum theory has the intriguing feature that is inconsistent with noncontextual hidden variable models, for which the outcome of a measurement does not depend on which other compatible measurements are being performed concurrently. While various proofs of such contextual behavior of quantum systems have been established, relatively little is known concerning the possibility to demonstrate this intriguing feature for indistinguishable particles. Here, we show in a simple and systematic manner that with projective measurements alone, it is possible to demonstrate quantum contextuality for such systems of arbitrary Hilbert space dimensions, including those corresponding to a qubit. Our demonstration is applicable to a single fermion as well as multiple fermions, and thus also a composite boson formed from an even number of fermions. In addition, our approach gives a clear demonstration of the intimate connection between complementarity and contextuality, two seemingly unrelated aspects of quantum theory.
Quantum theory has the intriguing feature that is inconsistent with noncontextual hidden variable models, for which the outcome of a measurement does not depend on which other compatible measurements are being performed concurrently. While various proofs of such contextual behavior of quantum systems have been established, relatively little is known concerning the possibility to demonstrate this intriguing feature for indistinguishable particles. Here, we show in a simple and systematic manner that with projective measurements alone, it is possible to demonstrate quantum contextuality for such systems of arbitrary Hilbert space dimensions, including those corresponding to a qubit. Our demonstration is applicable to a single fermion as well as multiple fermions, and thus also a composite boson formed from an even number of fermions. In addition, our approach gives a clear demonstration of the intimate connection between complementarity and contextuality, two seemingly unrelated aspects of quantum theory.
Recent experiments have demonstrated ququart state-independent quantum contextuality and qutrit state-dependent quantum contextuality. So far, the most basic form of quantum contextuality pointed out by Kochen and Specker, and Bell, has eluded experimental confirmation. Here we present an experimentally feasible test to observe qutrit state-independent quantum contextuality using single photons in a three-path setup. In addition, we show that if the same measurements are performed on two entangled qutrits, rather than sequentially on the same qutrit, then the noncontextual inequality becomes a Bell inequality. We show that this connection also applies to other recently introduced noncontextual inequalities.
Abstract Contextuality is a striking feature of our nature predicted by quantum theory and tested by various experiments. In a qubit system, testing contextuality requires scenarios distinct from traditional ones for systems with dimension of three or greater. In this paper, we consider the noncontextuality inequality developed by Liang-Spekkens-Wiseman and Yu-Oh, and investigate the set of three qubit measurements that can be used to test and violate this inequality. Our numerical results show that two of the three measurements can be almost arbitrary. Moreover, we have singled out several extremely interesting sets of measurements, e.g. one measurements can be white noise while the other two are arbitrarily close to white noise. These sets fulfill our knowledge about contextuality in this minimum quantum system.