Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising calculation method for obtaining a better solution to combinatorial optimization problems. QA is a natural computation technique proposed in the context of statistical physics in 1998. In 2011, the world's first commercial machine realizing QA experimentally was released. After that, the development of hardware and software has been exhaustive, and the studies on application search have been done using commercial QA machines. In this paper, we first explain the basics of QA without assuming the knowledge of statistical physics and quantum physics. We also show a couple of examples of application studies on QA. In addition, existing problems and overcoming other methods are explained.
Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising calculation method for obtaining a better solution to combinatorial optimization problems. QA is a natural computation technique proposed in the context of statistical physics in 1998. In 2011, the world's first commercial machine realizing QA experimentally was released. After that, the development of hardware and software has been exhaustive, and the studies on application search have been done using commercial QA machines. In this paper, we first explain the basics of QA without assuming the knowledge of statistical physics and quantum physics. We also show a couple of examples of application studies on QA. In addition, existing problems and overcoming other methods are explained.
Quantum annealing (QA) algorithm is a new quantum optimization algorithm based on the classical simulated annealing (SA) algorithm. Unlike classical SA algorithm, which uses the thermal waves to search for the optimal solution, the QA algorithm uses the quantum tunneling effect to allow a quantum to penetrate a potential barrier with a higher energy than itself. Therefore, the algorithm can get rid of the local extreme values and is more likely to approach the global optimal with higher probability. In the literature, the QA algorithm has shown perfect optimization effects on combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, the basic concepts and application fields of QA algorithm, which is the core principle of D-Wave quantum computer, are systematically reviewed. The applications of QA algorithm in cryptography, traveling salesman problem, graph coloring problem, and traffic path are discussed in detail. In addition, the direction of future research for QA algorithm is explored.
This paper explores the application of Quantum Annealing (QA) to the field of combinatorial optimization. The core idea is to leverage the principles of quantum mechanics, specifically quantum tunneling, to efficiently solve complex optimization problems. We present a framework for utilizing QA to tackle problems represented as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models. The methodology focuses on mapping the problem's constraints and objective function into a form suitable for QA hardware. We discuss the challenges involved in this mapping process, including the limitations of current QA devices and the need for careful problem formulation. Furthermore, we analyze the potential advantages of QA over classical optimization techniques, particularly concerning the exploration of a wider solution space. The research highlights the promise of QACO as a viable approach for tackling computationally demanding combinatorial optimization tasks, offering a novel method to enhance optimization efficiency.
Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.
Critical decision-making issues in science, engineering, and industry are based on combinatorial optimization; however, its application is inherently limited by the NP-hard nature of the problem. A specialized paradigm of analogue quantum computing, quantum annealing (QA), has been proposed to solve these problems by encoding optimization problems into physical energy landscapes and solving them by quantum tunnelling systematically through exploration of solution space. This is a critical review that summarizes the current applications of quantum annealing to combinatorial optimization and includes a theoretical background, hardware designs, algorithm implementation strategies, encoding and embedding schemes, protocols to benchmark quantum annealing, areas of implementation, and links with the quantum algorithms implementation with gate-based hardware and classical solvers. We develop a unified framework, relating adiabatic quantum dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to modern flux-qubit annealers (Chimera, Pegasus, Zephyr topologies), and emergent architectures (Lechner-Hauke-Zoller systems, Rydberg atom platforms), and hybrids of quantum and classical computation. Through our analysis, we find that overhead in embedding and encoding is the largest determinant of the scalability and performance (this is not just the number of qubits). Minor embeddings also usually have a physical qubit count per logical variable of between 5 and 12 qubits, which limits effective problem capacity by 80-92% and, due to chain-breaking errors, compromises the quality of solutions.
Combinatorial optimization is a foundation of numerous scientific, industrial, and social decision-making questions, but its usefulness is mostly restricted by the exponential complexity of the problem of classical computability. The quantum annealing (QA) has become one of the leading analogue quantum systems to address such problems, whereby optimization problems are converted into physical energy structures and quantum fluctuations are utilized to perform systematic exploration. It provides a critical, synthesized, and comprehensive review of quantum annealing as applied to combinatorial optimization, including the theoretical basis, hardware designs, algorithm methods, issues of embedding and encoding, benchmarking procedures, applications, and integration with quantum algorithms based on gates and solvers on a classical computer. We build a comprehensive taxonomy between adiabatic dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to state-of-the-art flux-qubit annealers, new architectures, and hybrid quantum classical pipelines. We show that the overhead of embedding and encoding and the benchmarking approach taken are the most significant factors in determining scalability and performance, but not the raw number of qubits. Transportation, energy systems, robotics, finance, pharmacological discovery, and machine learning are just some examples of the domain-specific case studies that use QA with minimal empirical utility as a hybrid refinement engine and not an independent solver. Moreover, we introduce a stringent evaluation of the existing benchmarking culture, clarify the causal links between QA and QAOA as well as between VQE and structural predicaments, and reveal the institutional roots of the existing restrictions. We conclude by identifying a research roadmap in the future, focusing on the annealing hardness characterization, Stoquastic control manipulation, embedding rules automation, architecture design, and development of principled quantum advantage. It creates a benchmark reference to those in the field and research and deployment of scalable, reliable, and application-relevant quantum optimization
A combinatorial optimization problem (COP) is the problem of finding the optimal solution in a finite set. When the size of the feasible solution set is large, the complexity of the problem increases, and it is not easy to solve in a reasonable time with the current classical computer technology. Quantum annealing (QA) is a method that replaces classical simulated annealing (SA) methods that do not solve these cases. Therefore, several attempts have been made to solve this problem using a special-purpose quantum annealer to which the QA method is applied. In this survey, we analyze recent studies that solve real-scale COPs using quantum annealers. Through this, we discuss how to reduce the size of the COP to be input to overcome the hardware limitations of the existing quantum annealer. Additionally, we demonstrated the applicability of quantum annealer to COP on a practical scale by comparing and analyzing the results of the classical simulated annealing (SA) and QA method from each study.