The Wigner Centennial Conference was held in Pécs, Hungary, on 8–12 July 2002. Eugene Paul Wigner was born in Budapest on 17 November 1902 and left us on 1 January 1995 in Princeton, USA. Numerous other conferences and conference sessions were also held during 2002 to commemorate the centennial year of his birth, because so many wished to pay tribute to him. It would, of course, take a major international effort to review thoroughly all the contributions Wigner made in all branches of physics and for the cause of world peace. The purpose of the Wigner Centennial Conference was to enrich and enhance the research lines initiated by Wigner. The conference was particularly interested in assembling young researchers who will develop and expand those research lines in the future. Indeed, there were many papers of current interest, including symmetry problems in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, group theoretical issues, foundations of quantum mechanics, nuclear physics, chemical physics, the phase-space formulation of quantum mechanics, as well as quantum computing, information and entanglement problems. In 1932 Wigner published a seminal paper entitled 'On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equations' ( Phys. Rev. 40 749--759) in which he introduced a fundamental tool for quantum mechanics known these days as the Wigner function. The Wigner function has a long history, but began to gain its major strength in quantum optics during the 1970s. Since then, it has become the primary scientific language for squeezed states of light dealing with multi-photon coherent states. The Wigner function is also the basic language for transition from classical to quantum mechanics through phase-space. It therefore plays a major role in detecting quantum effects in processes routinely regarded as classical. Indeed, most optical instruments have been based on classical optics; it is, however, a great challenge to find quantum effects in those devices. This itself is an important subject. Wigner initially formulated the Wigner function to understand thermodynamic effects in physical systems, and thus it plays an important role in studying entropy in measurement processes, statistical mechanics and chemical physics. Physicists do not seem to fully appreciate the fact that Wigner functions can be used for the purpose of group representations. For instance, the single-mode and two-mode squeezed states are isomorphic to the Lorentz groups O(2,1) and O(3,2), respectively. This can be done very cleanly within the framework of the Wigner phase-space approach. By combining two of Wigner's main research areas, namely group theory and the Wigner function, we can construct a very rich field of physics. This is a future possibility for today's young physicists. Turning to computing, a man or woman is born with ten fingers, which constitute a natural computer based on decimal numbers. Indeed, the Chinese developed an abacus for dealing with decimal numbers. Slide rules perform additions, but they can do multiplications in the logarithmic scale. In the 1940s, another Hungarian scientist named John von Neumann observed that vacuum tubes could perform 'yes or no' logic. His observation led to the computer age in which we live. It is interesting to note that both Wigner and von Neumann came from the same high school in Hungary, the Budapest Evangelikus Gimnazium. Likewise, Eugene Wigner began to worry about the language that atoms speak even before the present form of quantum mechanics was formulated. He published in 1929 a book entitled 'Group Theory and its Applications to Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra'. This is, in fact, the first book on quantum computing. Physicists do not yet seem to appreciate this aspect of Wigner's contribution, but eventually they will. If we are seriously interested in building quantum computers, we should use atoms. We should then develop mathematical algorithms to use group theory of atomic spectra for numerical computation. This is what Wigner left to us as a homework. The Wigner Centennial Conference was dedicated to Wigner's future rather than to his past. Indeed, we are very happy to note that many young physicists presented their new research results at this conference. We regret that this special issue cannot include all the subjects covered at the Conference. We are, however, very fortunate to have so many excellent papers on Wigner functions, quantum optics and quantum information, as well as quantum computing. The special issue is not meant to be the conference proceedings. The papers included here have been refereed according to the standards of Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics and publication was not restricted to the participants of the Conference. This is indeed a special issue dedicated to the above-mentioned subjects.
Phase space methods, particularly Wigner functions, provide intuitive tools for representing and analyzing quantum states. We focus on systems with SU(2) dynamical symmetry, which naturally describes spin and a wide range of two-mode quantum models. We present a unified phase space framework tailored to these systems, highlighting its broad applicability in quantum optics, metrology, and information. After reviewing the core SU(2) phase-space formalism, we apply it to states designed for optimal quantum sensing, where their nonclassical features are clearly revealed in the Wigner representation. We then extend the approach to systems with an indefinite number of excitations, introducing a generalized framework that captures correlations across multiple SU(2)-invariant subspaces. These results offer practical tools for understanding both theoretical and experimental developments in quantum science.
The Wigner function has been studied for more than eight decades. Historically, it was developed from the Schrodinger wave equation, although it could have been developed on its own right. The use of the Wigner function is particularly important in scattering problems and clearly shows the transition to the classical world. In general, the Wigner function is not a positive definite function. One of the interesting aspects of the Wigner function is the ability to transfer many of the results of classical transport theory into quantum approaches merely by replacing the Boltzmann distribution with the Wigner function. The Wigner function for either of the two oscillators can be found by integrating out the coordinates of the other oscillator. Modern approaches with the Wigner function provide a distinct formulation that is recognized as equivalent to, but is a different alternative to normal operator-based quantum mechanics.
This thesis addresses aspects of quantum phase and sets out to draw attention to a collection of new and extend some not so new techniques utilizing Weyl's correspondence rule and its inverse. The phase formulation of quantum mechanics is as old as quantum mechanics itself and evolved over a period of two decades due to the contributions of H. Weyl \cite{Weyl1950}, E. P. Wigner \cite{Wigner1932}, H. Groenewold \cite{Groenewold1946} and J. E. Moyal \cite{Moyal1949}. Over the ensuing years the phase picture has matured into a practical analytical tool, and has generated a multitude of technical papers, reports, reviews, and expositions from many authors and commentators. One reason for its success is that it offers an intuitive picture of quantum mechanics owing to its \it{classical look and feel}, and it has made an impression, in one way or another, in many fields such as mathematical physics, quantum optics, and physical chemistry.The thesis opens with a brief history of classical phase space, tracing the possible origin of the term ``phase space itself, and chronicles the events leading to the conceptualization (and generalization) of quantum phase space. In Chapter 2 the Weyl correspondence is recast in terms of von Neumann's integral kernel transform and a heuristic analysis is given from this perspective. A characteristic of Weyl's correspondence rule and its inverse is that there are two inherent representations of the same operator. These have been referred to as the Weyl representation and Wigner representation and are related by a symplectic Fourier transform. For an arbitrary outer dyadic operator it is shown that the Weyl representation leads to the \it{modified} Gabor transform (known to Signal Processing), while the Wigner representation specializes to the Bargmann transform and a representation in terms of analytic functions. Calculating Weyl-Wigner (WW) transforms of products of
n operators, from first principles, has proved to be a technically difficult problem. However, with the machinery developed in Chapter 2 the problem is reduced to a straightforward algebraic exercise. Finally, forming an
s-parametrized generalization of Weyl's correspondence rule and focusing on the Weyl representation it is shown to lead to an intimate relationship with the relative state formalism \cite{Ban1998}. Weyl's correspondence rule is only applicable to operators and consequently state vectors
∣ψ⟩ are not represented in the usual formulation of quantum phase space. This problem is circumvented in Chapter 3 by introducing the notion of a normalized fixed state (or window) vector
∣φ0⟩ to form an outer dyadic product $\wh{\Psi} = |\psi\rangle\langle\varphi_0|$. The WW transform of this product under the action of the Weyl's rule is a complex valued function of real variables called a phase amplitude and denoted by the symbol
Ψ. The phase amplitudes have many (and sometimes surprising) properties. For example they: \begin{itemize} \item form the building blocks of Wigner functions
W by admitting a generalized Born rule
W=Ψ⋆Ψˉ, and as such can be considered to be a more fundamental objects than Wigner functions; \item superpose and interfere like the state vectors they represent; \item specialize to the Bargmann and Gabor transforms when a Gaussian window is chosen; \end{itemize} \ni In Chapter 4 further aspects of phase amplitudes are explored and discussed. For example it is shown that they: \begin{itemize} \item define phase state vectors which form an over complete set and are elements of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space; \item allow unitary ray representations of the group symmetries of translation, rotation and time reversal; \item evolve in phase under the influence of a propagator
R which is intimately related to the Wigner propagator
P. \end{itemize} Chapter 5 considers an extension of phase amplitudes to include systems with finitely many degrees of freedom. These are called spin amplitudes and are obtained by first forming the outer dyadic product of a spin state vector with an arbitrary fixed spin state vector, and then applying a finite-dimensional analogue of the WW transform. The spin amplitude operator is represented as an
n×n matrix, whose elements are products of the spin components of the spin and fixed state vectors. Two kinds of spin amplitudes are considered, arising on the sphere
S2 or on a
(2j+1) dimensional lattice. In the special case of spin-$\half$ systems it is shown that the spin amplitudes transform as spinors under rotations on both the sphere and lattice. As a physical application the spin amplitudes for a spin-$\half$ magnetic dipole are found for a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) environment. Chapter 6 considers Schwinger's abstract approach to quantum mechanics which takes into account the inability to indefinitely compensate for fluctuations in the measurement process. The resulting measurement algebra provides a symbolic representation of the physical laws as opposed to the mathematical abstraction (of von Neumann and Dirac) that was justified \it{\'a posteriori} by being in agreement with experiment. Despite Schwinger's prolific work on the subject of measurement algebra, its interpretation in quantum phase remained an open issue. It is shown that the key to formulating a quantum phase in terms of the measurement operators and transformation functions is the determination of a suitable set of basis operators for an arbitrary measurement operator. Many new results follow as a consequence of expanding an arbitrary measurement operator in this basis. In Chapter 7 the quantum-classical interface is explored by considering Hamilton's principal function or action
S(q,v,t). Starting from a purely heuristic classical argument, a phase function
U(p,q,t) is derived in terms of the classical action and is shown to be proportional to the WW transform of the quantum evolution operator. This association leads to the transform \be U(p,q,t) = A(t) \int e^{ipv/\hbar} e^{iS(q,v,t)/\hbar} \; \rm{d}v, \ee which enables one, in principle, to deduce the Wigner functions of a given system when only the classical action is known. Simple physical systems are used to provide examples illustrating this approach.
Correct use of the Wigner representation of quantum mechanics, which is realized with joint distributions of quasiprobabilities in phase space, requires the use of certain specific rules and attention to a number of properties which distinguish the quasiprobability from a true probability. This paper is mainly concerned with these problems. In the Wigner representation the quantum Liouville equation appears instead of the Schroedinger equation. The solution may have no physical meaning unless it is subjected to a necessary and sufficient condition which selects an allowed class of distributions which describe quantum-mechanical pure states. This condition contains Planck's constant and imposes, besides the uncertainty relations, severe restrictions on the possible form of the Wigner function. When this condition is satisfied, one can reconstruct the wave function from the Wigner function. In the case of an oscillator, the quantization condition for the energies of the stationary states does not follow from the Liouville equation, but from this supplementary condition. Unlike the true probability density, any Wigner function (except Gaussian ones) of a pure state takes on negative values. Another important peculiarity is that the quasiprobability is not concentrated on certain hypersurfaces, but is smeared out over the entire phase space. These and other features considered in this paper should be kept in mind when using the Wigner representation in quantum-mechanical problems.
Abstract The phase‐space formulation of quantum mechanics has recently seen increased use in testing quantum technologies, including methods of tomography for state verification and device validation. Here, an overview of quantum mechanics in phase space is presented. The formulation to generate a generalized phase‐space function for any arbitrary quantum system is shown, such as the Wigner and Weyl functions along with the associated Q and P functions. Examples of how these different formulations are used in quantum technologies are provided, with a focus on discrete quantum systems, qubits in particular. Also provided are some results that, to the authors' knowledge, have not been published elsewhere. These results provide insight into the relation between different representations of phase space and how the phase‐space representation is a powerful tool in understanding quantum information and quantum technologies.