Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The electron as a wave

LASZLO SOLYMAR, Daniel Walsh, R.R.A. Syms

Published Sep 27, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Discusses the Davisson–Germer experiment in which electrons pass through a screen having one or two slits, and shows the necessity for a wave theory. The operation of an electron microscope is explained and some properties of the waves including the uncertainty between the simultaneous determination of position and momentum of the particle. Analogies with classical phenomena are discussed, namely the Fourier transform relationship between pulse length and spectral width, and the size of an aperture aerial and its relationship to the beamwidth.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198829942.003.0002

Related papers

An experiment on the particle–wave nature of electrons

Gioṙgio Matteucci, A. Migliori, Francisco F. Medina +1 more

A primary electron beam of a transmission electron microscope is scattered into secondary beams by the planes of atoms of a single crystal. These secondary beams are focused to form a diffraction pattern on the final screen. This experiment is similar to the Thompson one which, independently by Davisson and Germer, demonstrated the de Broglie hypothesis of the existence of electron waves. Without changing the experimental apparatus, it is possible to realize an interference experiment with electrons coming from two spatially separated sources in analogy with the optical Young set-up. Both experiments are clear evidence of the electron wave-like behaviour. By varying the conditions of illumination, changes of the fringe visibility which reveal the spatial coherence properties of the electron beam, are displayed.

European Journal of Physics•Dec 22, 2008•9 citations

Matter Waves

Bernard d’Espagnat

This chapter discusses the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics in the context of matter. Classical physics identified matter with particles and radiation with "waves." Although this description accounted for a large number of very important facts, it became apparent around the turn of the century that other phenomena, such as blackbody radiation and photoelectric effect, are satisfactorily explained only if radiation is described in terms of particles. Sometime later the hypothesis that, conversely, matter has wave properties was proposed by Louis de Broglie and was confirmed by the Davisson-Germer experiment of electron diffraction. In this experiment and similar ones, an electron beam was passed through a regular lattice (crystal), and subsequently showed the well-known diffraction patterns that are characteristic of waves. These results confirmed the theoretical predictions that a monoenergetic electron beam should be described by a plane wave and that the wave vector k of the wave should be related to the momentum p of an individual electron.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Central concepts in quantum mechanics

M. Kira, S. W. Koch

In the early 1900s more and more experimental evidence was accumulated indicating that microscopic particles show wave-like properties in certain situations. These particle-wave features are very evident, e.g., in measurements where electrons are diffracted from a double slit to propagate toward a screen where they are detected. Based on the classical averaging of particles discussed in Section 1.2.2, one expects that the double slit only modulates the overall intensity, not the spatial distribution. Experimentally, however, one observes a nearly perfect interference pattern at the screen implying that the electrons exhibit wave averaging features such as discussed in Section 2.1.2. This behavior, originally unexpected for particle beams, persists even if the experiment is repeated such that only one electron at a time passes the double slit before it propagates to the detection screen. Thus, the wave aspect must be an inherent property of individual electrons and not an ensemble effect. Another, independent argument for the failure of classical physics is that the electromagnetic analysis of atoms leads to the conclusion that the negatively charged electron(s) should collapse into the positively charged ion because the electron–ion system loses its energy due to the emission of radiation. As we will see, this problem can be solved by including the wave aspects of particles into the analysis. In particular, as discussed in Section 2.3.3, waves can never be localized to a point without increasing their momentum and energy beyond bounds.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 17, 2011•0 citations

The Diffraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel

Clinton J. Davisson

This article is taken from the manuscript prepared by the author for his address at the joint meeting of Section B of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Physical Society on December 28, 1927, at Nashville, Tennessee. An account of this work giving fuller experimental details is given by Davisson and Germer in the December, 1927, issue of the Physical Review. These experiments are fundamental to some of the newer theories in physics. Until they were performed, it could be said that all experimental facts about the electron could be explained by regarding it as a particle of negative electricity. It now appears that in some way a “wave-length” is connected with the electron's behavior. The work thus shows an interesting contrast with the discovery of A. H. Compton that a ray of light (a light pulse) suffers a change of wave-length upon impact with an electron, the change of wave-length corresponding exactly to the momentum gained by the electron. Until Compton's work, all the known facts about light could be explained by thinking of light as a wave motion. The Compton effect seems to prove the existence of particles of light. Physics is thus faced with a double duality. Compton showed that light is in some sense both a wave motion and a stream of particles. Davisson and Germer have now shown that a beam of electrons is in some sense both a stream of particles and a wave motion. At the same time, theoretical advances have been made which seem to pave the way for an understanding of this curious situation. A general account of these new developments was given by K. K. Darrow in his series “Contemporary Advances in Physics” in the Bell System Technical Journal for October, 1927. Some remarks on the relation of the Davisson and Germer experiments to the new mechanics were given in this article, p. 692 et seq. — Editor.

Bell System Technical Journal•Jan 1, 1928•43 citations

The electron as a wave

LASZLO SOLYMAR, Donald Walsh, R.R.A. Syms

Abstract Describes a number of electrical aspects of material behaviour best understood using a wave rather than a particle model of an electron, including electron interference in the two-slit experiment, electron diffraction from a crystal, the electron microscope, electron wave packets and the uncertainty relationship.

•Aug 26, 2024•0 citations

The Electron — A Wave

Edward K. Yeargers

Davisson and Germer performed an experiment, in which electrons were reflected from parallel layers of atoms in a crystal. The electrons showed interference, thus demonstrating the wave nature of the electron. Louis de Broglie postulated a wave model of the electron, in which an electron orbit was represented by a group of in-phase waves. The model predicted that the angular momentum of an electron could take on only a limited number of values, a concept that Neils Bohr had introduced some years earlier as an ad hoc assumption. In an electron microscope, electrons stream off a hot filament and are accelerated to high velocity by passing between two electrically charged plates. The electrons' wavelength is related to their velocity and it is easy to obtain electrons with wavelengths near 0.1 nm, which suggests the possibility of obtaining resolution of about the same magnitude.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 18, 2018•0 citations
Abstract Discusses the Davisson–Germer experiment in which electrons pass through a screen having one or two slits, and shows the necessity for a wave theory. The operation of an electron microscope is explained and some properties of the waves including the uncertainty between the simultaneous determination of position and momentum of the particle. Analogies with classical phenomena are discussed, namely the Fourier transform relationship between pulse length and spectral width, and the size of an aperture aerial and its relationship to the beamwidth.
A primary electron beam of a transmission electron microscope is scattered into secondary beams by the planes of atoms of a single crystal. These secondary beams are focused to form a diffraction pattern on the final screen. This experiment is similar to the Thompson one which, independently by Davisson and Germer, demonstrated the de Broglie hypothesis of the existence of electron waves. Without changing the experimental apparatus, it is possible to realize an interference experiment with electrons coming from two spatially separated sources in analogy with the optical Young set-up. Both experiments are clear evidence of the electron wave-like behaviour. By varying the conditions of illumination, changes of the fringe visibility which reveal the spatial coherence properties of the electron beam, are displayed.
This chapter discusses the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics in the context of matter. Classical physics identified matter with particles and radiation with "waves." Although this description accounted for a large number of very important facts, it became apparent around the turn of the century that other phenomena, such as blackbody radiation and photoelectric effect, are satisfactorily explained only if radiation is described in terms of particles. Sometime later the hypothesis that, conversely, matter has wave properties was proposed by Louis de Broglie and was confirmed by the Davisson-Germer experiment of electron diffraction. In this experiment and similar ones, an electron beam was passed through a regular lattice (crystal), and subsequently showed the well-known diffraction patterns that are characteristic of waves. These results confirmed the theoretical predictions that a monoenergetic electron beam should be described by a plane wave and that the wave vector k of the wave should be related to the momentum p of an individual electron.
In the early 1900s more and more experimental evidence was accumulated indicating that microscopic particles show wave-like properties in certain situations. These particle-wave features are very evident, e.g., in measurements where electrons are diffracted from a double slit to propagate toward a screen where they are detected. Based on the classical averaging of particles discussed in Section 1.2.2, one expects that the double slit only modulates the overall intensity, not the spatial distribution. Experimentally, however, one observes a nearly perfect interference pattern at the screen implying that the electrons exhibit wave averaging features such as discussed in Section 2.1.2. This behavior, originally unexpected for particle beams, persists even if the experiment is repeated such that only one electron at a time passes the double slit before it propagates to the detection screen. Thus, the wave aspect must be an inherent property of individual electrons and not an ensemble effect. Another, independent argument for the failure of classical physics is that the electromagnetic analysis of atoms leads to the conclusion that the negatively charged electron(s) should collapse into the positively charged ion because the electron–ion system loses its energy due to the emission of radiation. As we will see, this problem can be solved by including the wave aspects of particles into the analysis. In particular, as discussed in Section 2.3.3, waves can never be localized to a point without increasing their momentum and energy beyond bounds.
This article is taken from the manuscript prepared by the author for his address at the joint meeting of Section B of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Physical Society on December 28, 1927, at Nashville, Tennessee. An account of this work giving fuller experimental details is given by Davisson and Germer in the December, 1927, issue of the Physical Review. These experiments are fundamental to some of the newer theories in physics. Until they were performed, it could be said that all experimental facts about the electron could be explained by regarding it as a particle of negative electricity. It now appears that in some way a “wave-length” is connected with the electron's behavior. The work thus shows an interesting contrast with the discovery of A. H. Compton that a ray of light (a light pulse) suffers a change of wave-length upon impact with an electron, the change of wave-length corresponding exactly to the momentum gained by the electron. Until Compton's work, all the known facts about light could be explained by thinking of light as a wave motion. The Compton effect seems to prove the existence of particles of light. Physics is thus faced with a double duality. Compton showed that light is in some sense both a wave motion and a stream of particles. Davisson and Germer have now shown that a beam of electrons is in some sense both a stream of particles and a wave motion. At the same time, theoretical advances have been made which seem to pave the way for an understanding of this curious situation. A general account of these new developments was given by K. K. Darrow in his series “Contemporary Advances in Physics” in the Bell System Technical Journal for October, 1927. Some remarks on the relation of the Davisson and Germer experiments to the new mechanics were given in this article, p. 692 et seq. — Editor.
Davisson and Germer performed an experiment, in which electrons were reflected from parallel layers of atoms in a crystal. The electrons showed interference, thus demonstrating the wave nature of the electron. Louis de Broglie postulated a wave model of the electron, in which an electron orbit was represented by a group of in-phase waves. The model predicted that the angular momentum of an electron could take on only a limited number of values, a concept that Neils Bohr had introduced some years earlier as an ad hoc assumption. In an electron microscope, electrons stream off a hot filament and are accelerated to high velocity by passing between two electrically charged plates. The electrons' wavelength is related to their velocity and it is easy to obtain electrons with wavelengths near 0.1 nm, which suggests the possibility of obtaining resolution of about the same magnitude.