The measurement problem of quantum theory has troubled the minds of physicists and philosophers for decades. This paper will discuss a relatively new attempt at resolving the issue, known as the mechanism of the “flea”, as put forward by Landsman and Reuvers in [13] and by Landsman in [12]. This paper first reviews the formalism of algebraic quantum theory. Chapter 3 then contains the greatest conceptual work, given by a novel understanding of the measurement problem. In this context, a small, asymmetric perturbation that arises from the environment is postulated, as described in chapter 4. This “flea” perturbation provides the symmetry breaking required for a classical state to emerge from a quantum system, thereby bringing us one step closer to a possible solution of the measurement problem. Chapter 5 hopes to offer an evaluation of the flea mechanism. These comments focus on the limitations of the models considered, as well as the nature of the flea perturbation. In particular, the challenges in attempting to recover the Born rule are discussed. This discussion is informed by the work of Van Heugten and Wolters in [22]. Finally, the conclusion contains some general reflections on the flea proposal, portraying it as the start of a new way of making the idea of a wave function collapse mathematically precise.
The measurement problem of quantum theory has troubled the minds of physicists and philosophers for decades. This paper will discuss a relatively new attempt at resolving the issue, known as the mechanism of the “flea”, as put forward by Landsman and Reuvers in [13] and by Landsman in [12]. This paper first reviews the formalism of algebraic quantum theory. Chapter 3 then contains the greatest conceptual work, given by a novel understanding of the measurement problem. In this context, a small, asymmetric perturbation that arises from the environment is postulated, as described in chapter 4. This “flea” perturbation provides the symmetry breaking required for a classical state to emerge from a quantum system, thereby bringing us one step closer to a possible solution of the measurement problem. Chapter 5 hopes to offer an evaluation of the flea mechanism. These comments focus on the limitations of the models considered, as well as the nature of the flea perturbation. In particular, the challenges in attempting to recover the Born rule are discussed. This discussion is informed by the work of Van Heugten and Wolters in [22]. Finally, the conclusion contains some general reflections on the flea proposal, portraying it as the start of a new way of making the idea of a wave function collapse mathematically precise.
We propose a technical reformulation of the measurement problem of quantum mechanics, which is based on the postulate that the final state of a measurement is classical. Unlike the usual formulation (in which the post-measurement state is a unit vector in Hilbert space), our version actually opens the possibility of admitting a purely technical solution within the confines of conventional quantum theory (as opposed to solutions that either modify this theory, or introduce unusual and controversial interpretative rules and/or ontologies). To that effect, we recall a remarkable phenomenon in the theory of Schroedinger operators (discovered in 1981 by Jona-Lasinio et al), according to which the ground state of a symmetric double-well Hamiltonian becomes exponentially sensitive to tiny perturbations of the potential as h -> 0. We show that this instability emerges also from the textbook WKB approximation, extend it to time-dependent perturbations, and study the dynamical transition from the ground state of the double well to the perturbed ground state (in which the cat is typically either dead or alive, depending on the details of the perturbation). Numerical simulations show that adiabatically arising perturbations may (quite literally) cause the collapse of the wave-function in the classical limit. Thus, at least in the context of a simple mathematical model, we combine the technical and conceptual virtues of decoherence (which fails to solve the measurement problem but launches the key idea that perturbations may come from the environment) with those of dynamical collapse models a la GRW (which do solve the measurement problem but are ad hoc), without sharing their drawbacks: single measurement outcomes are obtained (instead of merely diagonal reduced density matrices), and no modification of quantum mechanics is needed.
Beginning with Anderson (1972) , spontaneous symmetry breaking ( ssb ) in infinite quantum systems is often put forward as an example of (asymptotic) emergence in physics , since in theory no finite system should display it. Even the correspondence between theory and reality is at stake here, since numerous real materials show ssb in their ground states (or equilibrium states at low temperature), although they are finite. Thus against what is sometimes called ‘Earman's Principle’, a genuine physical effect (viz. ssb ) seems theoretically recovered only in some idealisation (namely the thermodynamic limit), disappearing as soon as the idealisation is removed. We review the well-known arguments that (at first sight) no finite system can exhibit ssb , using the formalism of algebraic quantum theory in order to control the thermodynamic limit and unify the description of finite- and infinite-volume systems. Using the striking mathematical analogy between the thermodynamic limit and the classical limit, we show that a similar situation obtains in quantum mechanics (which typically forbids ssb ) versus classical mechanics (which allows it). This discrepancy between formalism and reality is quite similar to the measurement problem (now regarded as an instance of asymptotic emergence), and hence we address it in the same way, adapting an argument of the Landsman and Reuvers (2013) that was originally intended to explain the collapse of the wave-function within conventional quantum mechanics. Namely, exponential sensitivity to (asymmetric) perturbations of the (symmetric) dynamics as the system size increases causes symmetry breaking already in finite but very large quantum systems. This provides continuity between finite- and infinite-volume descriptions of quantum systems featuring ssb and hence restores Earman's Principle (at least in this particularly threatening case).
Quantum mechanics famously posits two distinct evolution rules for the state of a system: a deterministic, unitary time evolution under the Schr¨odinger equation, and a probabilistic “collapse” of the wavefunction upon measurement as dictated by the Born rule. The apparent inconsistency of these two dynamical laws – one continuous and one discontinuous – constitutes the quantum measurement problem. This foundational problem, which underlies the emergence of definite outcomes from quantum superpositions, has persisted since the theory’s inception. In this review, we present a comprehensive and rigorous examination of the measurement problem and survey the leading approaches that seek to resolve or circumvent it. We begin by formulating the measurement problem and its conceptual challenges. We then discuss in detail the major interpretations of quantum mechanics and theoretical frameworks addressing the problem: the Copenhagen interpretation, Everett’s many-worlds interpretation, de Broglie–Bohm pilot-wave theory, objective collapse models, the role of decoherence and environment-induced superselection, and epistemic approaches such as QBism. For each interpretation, we describe the core principles and mathematical formalism, assessing how (and whether) it attempts to solve the measurement problem. We also review modern developments and experiments relevant to quantum measurements, including tests of Bell inequalities, observations of decoherence and macroscopic superpositions, weak measurements and quantum eraser experiments, and thought experiments ‘a la Wigner’s friend. We highlight how these results inform the ongoing debate. Finally, we discuss open problems and challenges that remain in fully resolving the measurement problem.
Quantum mechanics cannot be applied within a closed system. Inevitable measurement process in quantum mechanics is usually treated separately from the basic principles of the framework and requires outside observer of the system. In this paper, we propose that the quantum measurement process is actually a physical process associated with the ubiquitous mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Based on this proposal, we construct a quantum measurement model in which the mixed state evolves into a pure state as the dynamical pro-coherence process. Furthermore, the classically distinguishable pointer parameter emerges as the c-number order parameter in the formalism of closed time-path quantum field theory. We also discuss the precision of the measurement and the possible deduction of the Born probability postulate.
This is the first single volume about the collapse theories of quantum mechanics, which is becoming a very active field of research in both physics and philosophy. In standard quantum mechanics, it is postulated that when the wave function of a quantum system is measured, it no longer follows the Schrödinger equation, but instantaneously and randomly collapses to one of the wave functions that correspond to definite measurement results. However, why and how a definite measurement result appears is unknown. A promising solution to this problem are collapse theories in which the collapse of the wave function is spontaneous and dynamical. Chapters written by distinguished physicists and philosophers of physics discuss the origin and implications of wave-function collapse, the controversies around collapse models and their ontologies, and new arguments for the reality of wave function collapse. This is an invaluable resource for students and researchers interested in the philosophy of physics and foundations of quantum mechanics.
The basic idea of quantum mechanics is that the property of any system can be in a state of superposition of various possibilities (or eigen states).This state of superposition is also known as wave function and it evolves linearly with time in a deterministic way in accordance with the Schrodinger equation.However, when a measurement is carried out on the system to determine the value of that property (say position), the system instantaneously transforms to one of the eigen states and thus we get only a single value as an outcome of the measurement.Quantum measurement problem seeks to find the cause and exact mechanism governing this transformation.In an attempt to solve the above problem, in this paper, we will first define what the wave function represents in real-world and will identify the root cause behind the stochastic nature of events.Then, we will develop a model to explain the mechanism of collapse of the quantum mechanical wave function in response to a measurement.In the process of development of model, we will explain Schrodinger cat paradox and will show how Born's rule for probability becomes a natural consequence of the measurement process.