Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Information Processing

Quantum histories and correlations in quantum measurements

Marcelo Losada, Roberto Laura

Published Sep 8, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11128-018-2050-3

Related papers

Entangled History

Jordan S. Cotler, Frank A. Wilczek

We introduce quantum history states and their mathematical framework, thereby reinterpreting and extending the consistent histories approach to quantum theory. Through thought experiments, we demonstrate that our formalism allows us to analyze a quantum version of history in which we reconstruct the past by observations. In particular, we can pass from measurements to inferences about what happened in a way that is sensible and free of paradox. Our framework allows for a richer understanding of the temporal structure of quantum theory, and we construct history states that embody peculiar, non-classical correlations in time.

•Feb 9, 2015•0 citations

Quantum histories and measurements

D. Sokolovski, Y. Liu

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 2001•6 citations

Entangled histories

Jordan S. Cotler, Frank A. Wilczek

We introduce quantum history states and their mathematical framework, thereby reinterpreting and extending the consistent histories approach to quantum theory. Through thought experiments, we demonstrate that our formalism allows us to analyze a quantum version of history in which we reconstruct the past by observations. In particular, we can pass from measurements to inferences about ‘what happened’ in a way that is sensible and free of paradox. Our framework allows for a richer understanding of the temporal structure of quantum theory, and we construct history states that embody peculiar, non-classical correlations in time.

arXiv:1502.02480•Physica Scripta•May 12, 2016•34 citations

Quantum and Classical Correlations in Quantum Measurement

Zhengjun Xi, Yongming Li

Foundations of Physics•Oct 11, 2012•6 citations

Quantum Correlations and the Measurement Problem

Jeffrey Bub

arXiv:1210.6371•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jun 28, 2013•7 citations

Decoherent histories and measurement of temporal correlation functions for Leggett-Garg inequalities

J. J. Halliwell

We consider two protocols for the measurement of the temporal correlation functions of a dichotomic variable $Q$ appearing in Leggett-Garg-type inequalities. The protocols measure solely whether $Q$ has the same or a different sign at the end of a given time interval, thereby measuring no more than is required for determination of the correlation function. They are inspired, in part, by a decoherent histories analysis of the two-time histories of $Q$, which yields a number of useful insights, although the protocols are ultimately expressed in macrorealistic form independent of quantum theory. The first type involves an ancilla coupled to the system with two sequential controlled-not (cnot) gates, and the two-time histories of the system (whose probabilities yield the correlation function) are determined in a single final time measurement of the ancilla. It is noninvasive for special choices of initial system states and partially invasive for more general choices. Modified Leggett-Garg-type inequalities which accommodate the partial invasiveness are discussed. The quantum picture of the protocol shows that for certain choices of the primary system initial state, the final state is unaffected by the two cnot gate interactions, hence the protocol is undetectable with respect to final system-state measurements, although it is still invasive at intermediate times. This invasiveness can be reduced with different choices of ancilla states and the protocol is then similar in flavor to a weak measurement. The second type of protocol is based on the fact that the behavior of $Q$ over a time interval can be determined from knowledge of the dynamics together with a measurement of certain initial (or final) data. Its quantum version corresponds to the known fact that when sets of histories are decoherent, their probabilities may be expressed in terms of a record projector, hence the two-time histories in which $Q$ has the same or a different sign can be determined by a single projective measurement. The resulting protocol resembles the decay-type protocol proposed by Huelga and collaborators (which is noninvasive but requires a stationarity assumption).

arXiv:1604.01659•Physical Review A•Nov 28, 2016•10 citations
We introduce quantum history states and their mathematical framework, thereby reinterpreting and extending the consistent histories approach to quantum theory. Through thought experiments, we demonstrate that our formalism allows us to analyze a quantum version of history in which we reconstruct the past by observations. In particular, we can pass from measurements to inferences about what happened in a way that is sensible and free of paradox. Our framework allows for a richer understanding of the temporal structure of quantum theory, and we construct history states that embody peculiar, non-classical correlations in time.
We introduce quantum history states and their mathematical framework, thereby reinterpreting and extending the consistent histories approach to quantum theory. Through thought experiments, we demonstrate that our formalism allows us to analyze a quantum version of history in which we reconstruct the past by observations. In particular, we can pass from measurements to inferences about ‘what happened’ in a way that is sensible and free of paradox. Our framework allows for a richer understanding of the temporal structure of quantum theory, and we construct history states that embody peculiar, non-classical correlations in time.
We consider two protocols for the measurement of the temporal correlation functions of a dichotomic variable QQQ appearing in Leggett-Garg-type inequalities. The protocols measure solely whether QQQ has the same or a different sign at the end of a given time interval, thereby measuring no more than is required for determination of the correlation function. They are inspired, in part, by a decoherent histories analysis of the two-time histories of QQQ, which yields a number of useful insights, although the protocols are ultimately expressed in macrorealistic form independent of quantum theory. The first type involves an ancilla coupled to the system with two sequential controlled-not (cnot) gates, and the two-time histories of the system (whose probabilities yield the correlation function) are determined in a single final time measurement of the ancilla. It is noninvasive for special choices of initial system states and partially invasive for more general choices. Modified Leggett-Garg-type inequalities which accommodate the partial invasiveness are discussed. The quantum picture of the protocol shows that for certain choices of the primary system initial state, the final state is unaffected by the two cnot gate interactions, hence the protocol is undetectable with respect to final system-state measurements, although it is still invasive at intermediate times. This invasiveness can be reduced with different choices of ancilla states and the protocol is then similar in flavor to a weak measurement. The second type of protocol is based on the fact that the behavior of QQQ over a time interval can be determined from knowledge of the dynamics together with a measurement of certain initial (or final) data. Its quantum version corresponds to the known fact that when sets of histories are decoherent, their probabilities may be expressed in terms of a record projector, hence the two-time histories in which QQQ has the same or a different sign can be determined by a single projective measurement. The resulting protocol resembles the decay-type protocol proposed by Huelga and collaborators (which is noninvasive but requires a stationarity assumption).