Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Robustness of Adaptive Quantum-Enhanced Phase Estimation.

Pantita Palittapongarnpim, Barry C. Sanders

Published Sep 14, 2018• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Phase Estimation

Hiu Yung Wong

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•6 citations

Robustness of quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation

Pantita Palittapongarnpim, Barry C. Sanders

We aim to construct tests for evaluating whether policies for adaptive quantum-enhanced metrology are robust against unknown phase noise and are tractable to construct and to execute. Specifically, one of our tests determines scaling of phase-estimate precision with respect to photon number; the other two tests concern resource complexity with respect to the training time required to construct the policy and the execution time for the policy so constructed. The robustness test is performed on quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation by simulating the scheme under four phase-noise models corresponding to normal-distribution noise, random-telegraph noise, skew-normal-distribution noise, and log-normal-distribution noise. Control policies are devised either by an evolutionary algorithm under the same noisy conditions, albeit ignorant of its properties, or a Bayesian-based feedback method that assumes no noise. We have introduced an approach to evaluating quantum-control policies for metrology that relies on testing against unusual phase-noise models and accepting that the policies are robust only if scaling of phase-estimate precision beats the standard quantum limit and policy-design resource complexity, in the presence of phase noise, is polynomial in the number of photons.

arXiv:1809.05525•Physical Review A•Jul 8, 2019•25 citations

Evolutionary Algorithm for Adaptive Quantum-Channel Control

Pantita Palittapongarnpim

The key to successful implementations of quantum technologies is quantum control, whose aim is to steer quantum dynamics such that the desired outcome is achieved. Quantum control techniques rely on models of the quantum dynamics to generate control policies that attain the control targets. In a practical situation, the dynamic model may not match the dynamic in the implementation, and this mismatch can lead to reduced performance or even a failed control procedure. Data-driven control has been proposed as an alternative to model-based control design. In this approach, measurement outcomes from the system are used to generate a policy, which enables robust control without the need for a noise model. The potential for data-driven quantum control has been demonstrated in the problem of quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation. However, the performance and robustness of data-driven policies have never been compared with performance and robustness of model-based control techniques. In this thesis, we aim to determine the advantages and disadvantages of model-based and data-driven policy generation using a simulated quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation as an example of a quantum control task. In the process, we explore the connection between an adaptive quantum-enhanced metrological procedure to a decision-making process, which is an alternative model of the dynamic during the control task. We also devise a robust search algorithm based on an evolutionary algorithm that is ignorant of the properties of the phase noise but is still able to deliver quantum-enhanced precision. We then compare the performances of feedback control policies designed using Bayesian inference, which is a model-based technique, to policies generated using this robust evolutionary algorithm on their performance in both noisy and noiseless interferometers. We also assess the resources used in generating and implementing a control policy and use the complexities of the time and space costs as parts of selecting a practical control procedure.

•Jan 23, 2019•3 citations

Quantum Phase Estimation

Hiu Yung Wong

Springer eBooks•Jun 21, 2023•0 citations

Quantum Phase Estimation

Osama M. Raisuddin, Suvranu De

Springer eBooks•Nov 14, 2025•0 citations

Robust estimation of optical phase varying as a continuous resonant process

Shibdas Roy, Ian R. Petersen, Elanor H. Huntington

It is well-known that adaptive homodyne estimation of continuously varying optical phase provides superior accuracy in the phase estimate as compared to adaptive or non-adaptive static estimation. However, most phase estimation schemes rely on precise knowledge of the underlying parameters of the system under measurement, and performance deteriorates significantly with changes in these parameters; hence it is desired to develop robust estimation techniques immune to such uncertainties. In related works, we have already shown how adaptive homodyne estimation can be made robust to uncertainty in an underlying parameter of the phase varying as a simplistic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic noise process. Here, we demonstrate robust phase estimation for a more complicated resonant noise process using a guaranteed cost robust filter.

arXiv:1303.0154•The proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications/The proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Control Applications•Aug 1, 2013•1 citation
We aim to construct tests for evaluating whether policies for adaptive quantum-enhanced metrology are robust against unknown phase noise and are tractable to construct and to execute. Specifically, one of our tests determines scaling of phase-estimate precision with respect to photon number; the other two tests concern resource complexity with respect to the training time required to construct the policy and the execution time for the policy so constructed. The robustness test is performed on quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation by simulating the scheme under four phase-noise models corresponding to normal-distribution noise, random-telegraph noise, skew-normal-distribution noise, and log-normal-distribution noise. Control policies are devised either by an evolutionary algorithm under the same noisy conditions, albeit ignorant of its properties, or a Bayesian-based feedback method that assumes no noise. We have introduced an approach to evaluating quantum-control policies for metrology that relies on testing against unusual phase-noise models and accepting that the policies are robust only if scaling of phase-estimate precision beats the standard quantum limit and policy-design resource complexity, in the presence of phase noise, is polynomial in the number of photons.
The key to successful implementations of quantum technologies is quantum control, whose aim is to steer quantum dynamics such that the desired outcome is achieved. Quantum control techniques rely on models of the quantum dynamics to generate control policies that attain the control targets. In a practical situation, the dynamic model may not match the dynamic in the implementation, and this mismatch can lead to reduced performance or even a failed control procedure. Data-driven control has been proposed as an alternative to model-based control design. In this approach, measurement outcomes from the system are used to generate a policy, which enables robust control without the need for a noise model. The potential for data-driven quantum control has been demonstrated in the problem of quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation. However, the performance and robustness of data-driven policies have never been compared with performance and robustness of model-based control techniques. In this thesis, we aim to determine the advantages and disadvantages of model-based and data-driven policy generation using a simulated quantum-enhanced adaptive phase estimation as an example of a quantum control task. In the process, we explore the connection between an adaptive quantum-enhanced metrological procedure to a decision-making process, which is an alternative model of the dynamic during the control task. We also devise a robust search algorithm based on an evolutionary algorithm that is ignorant of the properties of the phase noise but is still able to deliver quantum-enhanced precision. We then compare the performances of feedback control policies designed using Bayesian inference, which is a model-based technique, to policies generated using this robust evolutionary algorithm on their performance in both noisy and noiseless interferometers. We also assess the resources used in generating and implementing a control policy and use the complexities of the time and space costs as parts of selecting a practical control procedure.
It is well-known that adaptive homodyne estimation of continuously varying optical phase provides superior accuracy in the phase estimate as compared to adaptive or non-adaptive static estimation. However, most phase estimation schemes rely on precise knowledge of the underlying parameters of the system under measurement, and performance deteriorates significantly with changes in these parameters; hence it is desired to develop robust estimation techniques immune to such uncertainties. In related works, we have already shown how adaptive homodyne estimation can be made robust to uncertainty in an underlying parameter of the phase varying as a simplistic Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic noise process. Here, we demonstrate robust phase estimation for a more complicated resonant noise process using a guaranteed cost robust filter.