Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Spark-Based Distributed Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Zhaojuan Zhang, Wanliang Wang, Nan Gao, Yanwei Zhao

Published Jan 1, 2018• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-00560-3_42

Related papers

An improved quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm

Panchi Li, Hong Xiao

Applied Intelligence•Sep 17, 2013•27 citations

A Novel Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Algorithm and Its Application

Baisong Chen, Ye Xuemei, An Li +1 more

Information Technology Journal•Jan 21, 2012•1 citation

A Modified Quantum-Inspired Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Ling Wang, Mingde Zhang, Qun Niu +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•5 citations

Hybrid quantum particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application

Yukun Wang, Xuebo Chen

Science China Information Sciences•Sep 10, 2019•28 citations

An Improved Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Real Coding Method

Yin Guofu -

International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology•Feb 29, 2012•8 citations

Comparison of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization, and quantum evolutionary algorithm for preparation of quantum states

Xin Cheng, Xiujuan Lu, Yanan Liu +1 more

Four intelligent optimization algorithms are compared by searching for control pulses to achieve the preparation of target quantum states for closed and open quantum systems, which include differential evolution (DE), particle swarm optimization (PSO), quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO), and quantum evolutionary algorithm (QEA). We compare their control performance and point out their differences. By sampling and learning for uncertain quantum systems, the robustness of control pulses found by these four algorithms is also demonstrated and compared. The resulting research shows that the QPSO nearly outperforms the other three algorithms for all the performance criteria considered. This conclusion provides an important reference for solving complex quantum control problems by optimization algorithms and makes the QPSO be a powerful optimization tool.

Chinese Physics B•Apr 11, 2022•6 citations
Four intelligent optimization algorithms are compared by searching for control pulses to achieve the preparation of target quantum states for closed and open quantum systems, which include differential evolution (DE), particle swarm optimization (PSO), quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO), and quantum evolutionary algorithm (QEA). We compare their control performance and point out their differences. By sampling and learning for uncertain quantum systems, the robustness of control pulses found by these four algorithms is also demonstrated and compared. The resulting research shows that the QPSO nearly outperforms the other three algorithms for all the performance criteria considered. This conclusion provides an important reference for solving complex quantum control problems by optimization algorithms and makes the QPSO be a powerful optimization tool.