The conventional notion of elastic, coherent atom-surface scattering originates from the scattering particles acting as a quantum-mechanical matter wave, which coherently interfere to produce distinct Bragg peaks which persist at finite temperature. If we introduce inelastic scattering to this scenario, the result is that the surface particles become displaced by the scattering atoms, resulting in emission or absorption of phonons that shift the final energy and momentum of the scatterer. As the lowest-lying phonons are gapless excitations, the ability to measure these phonons is very difficult and this difficulty is exacerbated by the roughly 1-eV resolution found in high-energy helium scattering experiments. Even though the surface has in effect measured the presence of the scatterer which decoheres the particle, we retain the diffraction spots which are referred to as coherent scattering. How do we reconcile these disparate viewpoints? We propose an experiment to more precisely examine the question of coherence in atom-surface scattering. We begin with an initially coherent superposition of helium particles with equal probabilities of interacting with the surface or not interacting with the surface. The beams are directed so that after the scattering event, the atoms are recombined so that we can observe the resulting interference pattern. The degree to which phonons are excited in the lattice by the scattering process dictates the fringe contrast of the interference pattern of the resulting beams. We use semiclassical techniques to simulate and test the viability of this experiment and show that for a wide range of conditions, despite the massive change in the momentum perpendicular to the surface, we can still expect to have coherent (in the superposition sense) scattering.
The conventional notion of elastic, coherent atom-surface scattering originates from the scattering particles acting as a quantum-mechanical matter wave, which coherently interfere to produce distinct Bragg peaks which persist at finite temperature. If we introduce inelastic scattering to this scenario, the result is that the surface particles become displaced by the scattering atoms, resulting in emission or absorption of phonons that shift the final energy and momentum of the scatterer. As the lowest-lying phonons are gapless excitations, the ability to measure these phonons is very difficult and this difficulty is exacerbated by the roughly 1-eV resolution found in high-energy helium scattering experiments. Even though the surface has in effect measured the presence of the scatterer which decoheres the particle, we retain the diffraction spots which are referred to as coherent scattering. How do we reconcile these disparate viewpoints? We propose an experiment to more precisely examine the question of coherence in atom-surface scattering. We begin with an initially coherent superposition of helium particles with equal probabilities of interacting with the surface or not interacting with the surface. The beams are directed so that after the scattering event, the atoms are recombined so that we can observe the resulting interference pattern. The degree to which phonons are excited in the lattice by the scattering process dictates the fringe contrast of the interference pattern of the resulting beams. We use semiclassical techniques to simulate and test the viability of this experiment and show that for a wide range of conditions, despite the massive change in the momentum perpendicular to the surface, we can still expect to have coherent (in the superposition sense) scattering.
Scattering of fast neutral atoms with keV kinetic energies at alkali-halide surfaces under grazing angles displays intriguing diffraction patterns (Schuller, Wethekam and Winter 2007, Roisseau et al. 2007). In spite of the impulsive interaction with a surface at elevated temperature, which results in phonon excitation, quantum coherence evidently persists. To quantitatively study this remarkable survival of coherence, we present an ab initio simulation of the quantum diffraction of fast helium beams at a LiF (100) surface in the 〈110〉 direction and compare with recent experimental diffraction data. Decoherence is analyzed employing a quantum trajectory Monte Carlo method (Minami, Reinhold and Burgdorfer 2003), calculating the ensemble average over solutions of a stochastic linear Schrodinger equation. The evolution of the atomic wavepacket is governed by a sequence of stochastic collisions and continuous propagation in the He-LiF surface potential. We find near-perfect agreement between the resulting diffraction patterns and experimental results (Schuller, Wethekam and Winter 2007) without using any adjustable parameters. The question, whether the LiF surface features “buckling”, (i.e. vertical surface reconstruction where the F atoms are displaced relative to the Li atoms) has been addressed in the past (de Wette, Kress and Schroder 1985). However, experimental uncertainties were of the same order as the displacement amplitude itself. In atom-surface diffraction at a grazing angle, surface reconstruction drastically changes the diffraction patterns. By comparison of numerical and experimental results, the buckling amplitude can be determined with unprecedented accuracy.
Diffraction of fast helium atoms at alkali-halide surfaces under grazing angles of incidence shows intriguing diffraction patterns. The persistence of quantum coherence is remarkably strong, even though high surface temperatures and high (keV) kinetic energies of the incident atoms would strongly suggest the dominance of dissipative and decohering processes. The main source of decoherence is the excitation or absorption of surface vibrations upon impact. The momentum transfer between the surface and the incident helium atom depends on the amplitude of the thermal vibrations of the surface atoms and the energy of the incident particle. We present an ab initio simulation of the quantum diffraction of fast helium beams at a LiF (100) surface in the (110) direction, and compare with recent experimental diffraction data.
Scattering of fast neutral atoms with keV kinetic energies at alkali-halide surfaces under grazing angles displays intriguing diffraction patterns. The surprisingly strong persistence of quantum coherence despite the impulsive interaction with an environment at solid state density and elevated temperatures raises fundamental questions such as to the suppression of decoherence and of the quantum-to-classical crossover. We present an ab initio simulation of the quantum diffraction of fast helium beams at a LiF (100) surface in the 110 direction and compare with recent experimental diffraction data. From the quantitative reconstruction of diffraction images the vertical LiF-surface reconstruction, or buckling, can be determined.
Typically one expects that when a heavy particle collides with a surface, the scattered angular distribution will follow classical mechanics. The heavy mass usually assures that the coherence length of the incident particle in the direction of the propagation of the particle (the parallel direction) will be much shorter than the characteristic lattice length of the surface, thus leading to a classical description. Recent work on molecular interferometry has shown that extreme collimation of the beam creates a perpendicular coherence length which is sufficiently long so as to observe interference of very heavy species passing through a grating. Here we show, using quantum mechanical simulations, that the same effect will lead to quantum diffraction of heavy particles colliding with a surface. The effect is robust with respect to the incident energy, the angle of incidence, and the mass of the particle.
Atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an indispensable tool for interdisciplinary investigations of radiation soft or hard materials that evolves rapidly because emerging technologies enable remarkable new experiments [1, 2]. Nowadays, many of them embrace the time domain [2-4]. Beyond materials research, electron microscopy is uniquely suited to study fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects. In fact, it remains concerning that aspects addressing the wave-particle duality, time-dependent measurements, or the entanglement of wave functions and their collapse at a detector still require detailed investigations to guide progress. Certainly, this is no academic matter because such aspects become the bottleneck for the deployment of microscopes that enable studying dynamic processes at high spatiotemporal resolution. It is established practice to describe the scattering of electron ensembles by either a particle picture (Figure 1a) or a wave picture (Figure 1b). Sometimes both pictures are mixed. In spite of calls for solving Schrödinger’s time dependent equation [5], the static Schrödinger equation of wave functions is almost exclusively used to reliably simulate the image formation process using multislice calculations for coherent-elastically scattered electron ensembles [6, 7]. Moreover, the Copenhagen convention of quantum mechanics [8] is adopted, which emphasizes the importance of an observation for the collapse of wave functions (Figure 1b). In order to foster further insight into fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects we pursue a series of experiments with low electron dose rates that guarantee the presence of single electrons in the microscope column at any given time [9]. Consequently, we address the scattering of single electrons (Figure 1c) and build up intensities from electron ensembles over time. In such conditions energy filtered TEM recently revealed the presence of image intensity at sample/vacuum interfaces that cannot be simulated using the established (static) calculation tools even if frozen phonon excitations are considered [10]. In contrast, these intensities can be explained by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation assuming that an energy exchange ΔE occurs during any interaction of the electron with the sample in the Heisenberg limit ΔE = ℏ/2 Δt−1 (coherent-inelastic scattering). In this process a wave package is formed by the superposition of partial waves and a decoherence phase of 0.5-1 radian [10]. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two parameters that characterize the static and the dynamic behavior of any wave function ψ(r, t) = ψ(r) ϕ(t), namely xstatic = ℏ/(2mΔE)1/2 and xdynamic = ℏc/ΔE [11]. The former is the de Broglie wavelength if ΔE is a kinetic energy and the latter becomes an expression for self-coherence if the scattering process is coherent-inelastic in the Heisenberg limit. In these circumstances, the product of Planck’s constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE (hc = (λ2/Δλ) ΔE). The validity of the relation is shown in Figure 2 [11]. Thus, the temporal part of Schrödinger’s equation adds contributions of a finite self-coherence length (or time if the electron velocity is considered) to any scattering process, which is neglected if only the static expression is exploited. Further, the formation of wave packages rationalizes the wave-particle duality. The width of wave packages is described by a self-coherence length ls that can vary by over 40 orders of magnitude depending on the strength of interactions [11]. For Coulomb interactions, ls explains the vanishing phase contrast from EF-HRTEM images when the energy loss exceeds values of ΔE > 200 eV [11]. A procedure to experimentally determine the self-coherence length was established earlier by measuring the energy dependent localization of scattered matter waves in surface proximity [10]. Therefore, electron microscopy can be used as a general tool to measure the self-coherence length in real space images on a scale of nanometers and relate this these values to a self-coherence time that reaches attoseconds [12]. Particle and wave descriptions of electron scattering. a) Scattering of electron ensembles in a particle picture. The process is often described by Feynman diagrams, which involves the emission of a virtual photon of lifetime given by Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. b) Scattering of electron ensembles in a wave picture that underlies the multi-slice calculations. Infinite wave functions entangle source, sample and detector. The Copenhagen convention requires a wave function collapse upon observation. c) Proposed scattering process of a single electron wave function. The energy exchange occurs in the Heisenberg limit ΔEloss = E2-E1= ℏ/2 (t2-t1)−1= ℏ/2 Δt−1 when a wave package is formed during Δt because of existing energy (wavelength) differences ΔEloss of partial waves [11]. Measurements of self-coherence length and the related self-coherence time at the calculated Heisenberg limit. The colored background marks the quantum realm. The solid lines represent the Heisenberg limit in space and time, which includes the constant ℏc [11].