Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Statistics of Psychological Observations: an Introduction for Cocky Beach Girls.

Johan Noldus

Published Aug 1, 2018• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In order to further dessiminate my work on psychological interactions, we describe situations in real life which are prone to quantum mechanical effects. The cocky beach girls have now the opportunity to test such important things in life.

Related papers

Metaphysical unity of transcendental psychology and quantum mechanics. Article 2.

Нагдян Рубен Михайлович

This article is a continuation of the previous one, published in this journal under the same title. The article continues the theoretical consideration of signs of the unity of transcendental psychology (TP) and quantum mechanics (QM) in the vision of Aristotle's metaphysics. In the context of the metaphysical triad necessary-possible-real, the «intersection points» of A. I. Mirakyan’s transcendental psychology and the interpretation of quantum mechanics by A. Yu. Sevalnikov. It is shown that in the both transcendental psychology and quantum mechanics epistemological problems are associated with the impossibility of using the language of their classical predecessors. In both sciences, it becomes necessary to use a new language, a new way of thinking and a new logic of understanding the phenomena under study. All this allows us to conclude that both in transcendental psychology and in quantum mechanics, researchers are dealing with a new ontology of reality that differs from that studied in classical physics and in the phenomenology of classical psychology. It became necessary to divide reality into observable and unobservable. This allows us to say that we are talking about polyontic (or modal) philosophy – different modalities or modes of being, within the framework of which it is necessary to consider the relationship between the necessary, the possible and the real things. Both sciences are the sciences of becoming. If QM is the science of the formation of the observed world, then TP is the science of the generation of phenomena of psychical reality. This is one of the reasons for the unity of their methodological foundations. There is a fairly close similarity in the understanding of the concept of «coexisting opportunities» (or «potential opportunities»). In TP, it coincides with the concept of the coexistence of functionally equal opportunities for reflecting various concomitant properties of objects, and in QM – with the principle of superposition of states of elementary particles. The relative nature of the formation of the phenomenon in the reality of the real follows it. In TP, this is expressed in the realization of one of the coexisting possibilities of reflecting any of the presented properties of the object, and in QM this is expressed as a result of the reduction of the wave function to one of the possible states of a quantum object. The relativity of the formation of a specific phenomenon, determined by the existence of «coexisting possibilities», is realized according to the principle of relativity to the means of observation.

Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Applications of Quantum Probability in psychology

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Elliptic Curve Cryptography and Quantum Computing

Emily Alderson

In the year 2007, a slightly nerdy girl fell in love with all things math. Even though she only was exposed to a small part of the immense field of mathematics, she knew that math would always have a place in her heart. Ten years later, that passion for math is still burning inside. She never thought she would be interested in anything other than strictly mathematics. However, she discovered a love for computer science her sophomore year of college. Now, she is graduating college with a double major in both mathematics and computer science.\nThis nerdy girl is me. It was my first semester, freshman year at Ouachita Baptist University when I discovered an interest in cryptography. Discrete Mathematics had a small portion of the class that discussed various types of cryptosystems. These were the simplified versions that were easier to comprehend so that we could truly grasp the underlying concepts of cryptography. However, I craved more. I wanted to delve further into the advanced world of cryptography. It was not until my Honors Directed Study that I was able to do so.\nDuring my directed study, I was able to research the history of cryptography and what it has transformed into today. While it was fascinating to look at all the various cryptosystems that have been created throughout time, one cryptosystem caught my eye in particular—Elliptic Curve Cryptography, commonly referred to as ECC. I had heard of a few cryptosystems but never the ECC. As such, my interest was piqued. Having the opportunity to research Elliptic Curve Cryptography, I was ready to try and understand a new mathematical concept. I was ready to further expand my love and passion for mathematics, and I was not disappointed. Learning even the basics of elliptical curves proved challenging. The math behind ECC is immense and quite frankly, intimidating. Nevertheless, I do not back down from a challenge…at least not a mathematical one.\nMy research of elliptic curves, the basis of Elliptic Curve Cryptography, opened up my eyes to an entirely new field of mathematics. The challenges that arose during my studies, while frustrating at times, are well worth the wealth of knowledge I was able to acquire. The research in my study of elliptical curve cryptography only increased the ten-year passion for mathematics that is still inside the slightly nerdy girl.\nThis paper is the culmination of all my research over elliptic curves. It reflects the knowledge that I was able to acquire while studying elliptic curve cryptography and quantum computers.

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Does Quantum Mechanics Apply to How People Think?

Liane M. Gabora

This paper discusses psychological counterparts to the 'observer effect' and 'entanglement.'

•Nov 8, 2022•0 citations

Asymmetric Splitting of Bose-Einstein Condensate

Eun Oh

My life has been a blessing from God in many ways.First and foremost, I would like to thank professors Cass Sackett and Bill Soffa for encouraging and never giving up on me.The completion of my study could not have happened without them.In reaching the apex of my endeavor, I am forever indebted in gratefulness.Without their help, this would have been an impossible journey.They also inspired me to consider teaching as my new goal.Despite other lucrative offers, I believe teaching has a true meaning and purpose for me.I'd also like to thank graduate students in Casslab, especially Rob Horne, who shared the burden of making our experiment a successful one.My life re-started in the states at ten years old, when barely speaking a word of English, Bob Schmitt and Greg Bartman became my lifelong friends.Mr. & Mrs (Mom) Bartman never seemed to get tired of my coming over to their house/beach house living like a son who never paid rent.In Laurel high school, I would like to thank Mr. Swartz for making math an approachable subject.I must also thank Mr/Coach Chuck Hickes for believing in my success -not only were you my football coach, you coached me in so many other ways in life!At Swarthmore, Professor John Gaustad took me under his wings and taught me how to study and do research.You did everything you could to make sure I could be successful at research through experiments.My 6 years spent at NASA proved to be a very valuable experience in many ways.Ed Cheng, Dale Fixsen, and John Mather were three significant influences in my life.I still remember Casey Inman teaching me how to make circuits.I had an unforgettable experience at Antarctica, running the CMBR experiment.It's funny how one opportunity leads to another, who would have thought I'd meet my wife Yeonju (Sarah) there, and name our daughters Erebus and Terranova after the mountains in Antarctica.My 14 years at the Naval Research Lab are unforgettable ones.It took me everywhere including Afghanistan.My thanks go to Charmaine Gilbreath, who provided the opportunity for me to pursue graduate studies.Before coming to UVa, my short stint at GWU was not a waste.I'd like to thank professor Helmut Haberzettl for his German way of physics.I also like to

•Nov 21, 2014•2 citations

Experiment‐Dependent Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics and Psychology

Robert F. Bordley

Physics Essays•Sep 1, 1997•5 citations
This article is a continuation of the previous one, published in this journal under the same title. The article continues the theoretical consideration of signs of the unity of transcendental psychology (TP) and quantum mechanics (QM) in the vision of Aristotle's metaphysics. In the context of the metaphysical triad necessary-possible-real, the «intersection points» of A. I. Mirakyan’s transcendental psychology and the interpretation of quantum mechanics by A. Yu. Sevalnikov. It is shown that in the both transcendental psychology and quantum mechanics epistemological problems are associated with the impossibility of using the language of their classical predecessors. In both sciences, it becomes necessary to use a new language, a new way of thinking and a new logic of understanding the phenomena under study. All this allows us to conclude that both in transcendental psychology and in quantum mechanics, researchers are dealing with a new ontology of reality that differs from that studied in classical physics and in the phenomenology of classical psychology. It became necessary to divide reality into observable and unobservable. This allows us to say that we are talking about polyontic (or modal) philosophy – different modalities or modes of being, within the framework of which it is necessary to consider the relationship between the necessary, the possible and the real things. Both sciences are the sciences of becoming. If QM is the science of the formation of the observed world, then TP is the science of the generation of phenomena of psychical reality. This is one of the reasons for the unity of their methodological foundations. There is a fairly close similarity in the understanding of the concept of «coexisting opportunities» (or «potential opportunities»). In TP, it coincides with the concept of the coexistence of functionally equal opportunities for reflecting various concomitant properties of objects, and in QM – with the principle of superposition of states of elementary particles. The relative nature of the formation of the phenomenon in the reality of the real follows it. In TP, this is expressed in the realization of one of the coexisting possibilities of reflecting any of the presented properties of the object, and in QM this is expressed as a result of the reduction of the wave function to one of the possible states of a quantum object. The relativity of the formation of a specific phenomenon, determined by the existence of «coexisting possibilities», is realized according to the principle of relativity to the means of observation.
In the year 2007, a slightly nerdy girl fell in love with all things math. Even though she only was exposed to a small part of the immense field of mathematics, she knew that math would always have a place in her heart. Ten years later, that passion for math is still burning inside. She never thought she would be interested in anything other than strictly mathematics. However, she discovered a love for computer science her sophomore year of college. Now, she is graduating college with a double major in both mathematics and computer science.\nThis nerdy girl is me. It was my first semester, freshman year at Ouachita Baptist University when I discovered an interest in cryptography. Discrete Mathematics had a small portion of the class that discussed various types of cryptosystems. These were the simplified versions that were easier to comprehend so that we could truly grasp the underlying concepts of cryptography. However, I craved more. I wanted to delve further into the advanced world of cryptography. It was not until my Honors Directed Study that I was able to do so.\nDuring my directed study, I was able to research the history of cryptography and what it has transformed into today. While it was fascinating to look at all the various cryptosystems that have been created throughout time, one cryptosystem caught my eye in particular—Elliptic Curve Cryptography, commonly referred to as ECC. I had heard of a few cryptosystems but never the ECC. As such, my interest was piqued. Having the opportunity to research Elliptic Curve Cryptography, I was ready to try and understand a new mathematical concept. I was ready to further expand my love and passion for mathematics, and I was not disappointed. Learning even the basics of elliptical curves proved challenging. The math behind ECC is immense and quite frankly, intimidating. Nevertheless, I do not back down from a challenge…at least not a mathematical one.\nMy research of elliptic curves, the basis of Elliptic Curve Cryptography, opened up my eyes to an entirely new field of mathematics. The challenges that arose during my studies, while frustrating at times, are well worth the wealth of knowledge I was able to acquire. The research in my study of elliptical curve cryptography only increased the ten-year passion for mathematics that is still inside the slightly nerdy girl.\nThis paper is the culmination of all my research over elliptic curves. It reflects the knowledge that I was able to acquire while studying elliptic curve cryptography and quantum computers.
My life has been a blessing from God in many ways.First and foremost, I would like to thank professors Cass Sackett and Bill Soffa for encouraging and never giving up on me.The completion of my study could not have happened without them.In reaching the apex of my endeavor, I am forever indebted in gratefulness.Without their help, this would have been an impossible journey.They also inspired me to consider teaching as my new goal.Despite other lucrative offers, I believe teaching has a true meaning and purpose for me.I'd also like to thank graduate students in Casslab, especially Rob Horne, who shared the burden of making our experiment a successful one.My life re-started in the states at ten years old, when barely speaking a word of English, Bob Schmitt and Greg Bartman became my lifelong friends.Mr. & Mrs (Mom) Bartman never seemed to get tired of my coming over to their house/beach house living like a son who never paid rent.In Laurel high school, I would like to thank Mr. Swartz for making math an approachable subject.I must also thank Mr/Coach Chuck Hickes for believing in my success -not only were you my football coach, you coached me in so many other ways in life!At Swarthmore, Professor John Gaustad took me under his wings and taught me how to study and do research.You did everything you could to make sure I could be successful at research through experiments.My 6 years spent at NASA proved to be a very valuable experience in many ways.Ed Cheng, Dale Fixsen, and John Mather were three significant influences in my life.I still remember Casey Inman teaching me how to make circuits.I had an unforgettable experience at Antarctica, running the CMBR experiment.It's funny how one opportunity leads to another, who would have thought I'd meet my wife Yeonju (Sarah) there, and name our daughters Erebus and Terranova after the mountains in Antarctica.My 14 years at the Naval Research Lab are unforgettable ones.It took me everywhere including Afghanistan.My thanks go to Charmaine Gilbreath, who provided the opportunity for me to pursue graduate studies.Before coming to UVa, my short stint at GWU was not a waste.I'd like to thank professor Helmut Haberzettl for his German way of physics.I also like to