Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy

A Further Review on the Implications of Quantum Postulates for Natural Philosophy

Víctor Gómez Pin

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5840/wcp232018581238

Related papers

Implications of the Luders Postulate for Quantum Algorithms

Bernhard K. Meister

The Luders postulate is reviewed and implications for quantum algorithms are discussed. A search algorithm for an unstructured database is described.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509052•Sep 7, 2005•0 citations

A Further Review of the Incompatibility between Classical Principles and Quantum Postulates

Miguel Ferrero, Víctor Gómez Pin, D. Salgado +1 more

Foundations of Science•May 14, 2012•6 citations

The Quantum Postulate and Atomic Theory

F. J. SELBY

Nature•May 26, 1928•1 citation

To Be, Not To Be, Maybe

Tim Maudlin

Philosopher of science Tim Maudlin reviews a recent book on quantum theory and its implications for philosophy: Quantum Ontology: A Guide to the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics by Peter J. Lewis.

Inference International Review of Science•Nov 23, 2017•0 citations

Some comments on three suggested postulates for quantum theory

David Cienfuegos Salgado, J. L. Sánchez‐Gómez

arXiv:quant-ph/0106158•Foundations of Physics Letters•Jun 1, 2002•5 citations

What Quantum Mechanics Doesn't Show

Justin P. McBrayer, Dugald Owen

Students often invoke quantum mechanics in class or papers to make philosophical points.This tendency has been encouraged by pop culture influences like the film What the Bleep do We Know?There is little merit to most of these putative implications.However, it is difficult for philosophy teachers unfamiliar with quantum mechanics to handle these supposed implications in a clear and careful way.This paper is a philosophy of science version of MythBusters.We offer a brief primer on the nature of quantum mechanics, enumerate nine of the most common implications associated with quantum mechanics, and finally clarify each implication with the facts.Our goal is to explain what quantum mechanics doesn't show.

Teaching Philosophy•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations
Students often invoke quantum mechanics in class or papers to make philosophical points.This tendency has been encouraged by pop culture influences like the film What the Bleep do We Know?There is little merit to most of these putative implications.However, it is difficult for philosophy teachers unfamiliar with quantum mechanics to handle these supposed implications in a clear and careful way.This paper is a philosophy of science version of MythBusters.We offer a brief primer on the nature of quantum mechanics, enumerate nine of the most common implications associated with quantum mechanics, and finally clarify each implication with the facts.Our goal is to explain what quantum mechanics doesn't show.