The Pauli exclusion principle is a key postulate of the quantum theory and informs much of what we know about matter. In terms of electronic structure, the lone, deceptively simple mathematical requirement is that the total wave function be antisymmetric with respect to the exchange of any two electrons. However, visualizing the effect on the electron distribution presents a formidable challenge to students because of the complexity and number of variables involved. Approaches to gaining insight developed here include a quantitative analysis of two-dimensional configuration spaces as well as a qualitative assessment of interference patterns. For 2p x 1 2p y 1 states as representative examples, the analysis reveals that the Pauli principle directs electrons with opposing spins to codistribute along axes passing through the nucleus in the plane of the occupied orbitals. On the other hand, electrons with the same spin are never simultaneously in the same place or on the same axis; instead, they preferentially distribute in perpendicular directions.
The Pauli exclusion principle is a key postulate of the quantum theory and informs much of what we know about matter. In terms of electronic structure, the lone, deceptively simple mathematical requirement is that the total wave function be antisymmetric with respect to the exchange of any two electrons. However, visualizing the effect on the electron distribution presents a formidable challenge to students because of the complexity and number of variables involved. Approaches to gaining insight developed here include a quantitative analysis of two-dimensional configuration spaces as well as a qualitative assessment of interference patterns. For 2p x 1 2p y 1 states as representative examples, the analysis reveals that the Pauli principle directs electrons with opposing spins to codistribute along axes passing through the nucleus in the plane of the occupied orbitals. On the other hand, electrons with the same spin are never simultaneously in the same place or on the same axis; instead, they preferentially distribute in perpendicular directions.
The atom's orbital electron structure in terms of quantum numbers (principal, azimuthal, magnetic and spin) results in there being space for a maximum of: 2 electrons in the n=1 orbit, 8 electrons in the n=2 orbit, 18 electrons in the n=3 orbit, and so on. Those dispositions are correct; but that is not because of quantum numbers nor angular momentum nor a "Pauli exclusion principle". That orbital electron arrangement is enforced by the requirement of accommodating the space that each orbiting electron's matter wave occupies.
The modern state of the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) is discussed. PEP can be considered from two viewpoints. On the one hand, it asserts that particles with half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles with integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. This is the so-called spin-statistics connection (SSC). As we will discuss, the physical reasons why SSC exists are still unknown. On the other hand, according to PEP, the permutation symmetry of the total wave functions can be only of two types: symmetric or antisymmetric, both belong to one-dimensional representations of the permutation group, all other types of permutation symmetry are forbidden; whereas the solution of the Schrödinger equation may have any permutation symmetry. It is demonstrated that the proof in some widespread textbooks on quantum mechanics that only symmetric and antisymmetric states (one-dimensional representations of the permutation group) can exist is wrong. However, the scenarios, in which an arbitrary permutation symmetry (degenerate permutation states) is permitted lead to contradictions with the concepts of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the existence in our nature particles only in nondegenerate permutation states (symmetric and antisymmetric) is not accidental and so-called symmetrization postulate may not be considered as a postulate, since all other symmetry options for the total wave function may not be realized. From this an important conclusion follows: we may not expect that in future some unknown elementary particles can be discovered that are not fermions or bosons.
The Pauli exclusion principle is a fundamental law underpinning the structure of matter. Because of their antisymmetric wave function, no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state. Here, we report on the direct observation of the Pauli principle in a continuous system of up to six particles in the ground state of a two-dimensional harmonic oscillator. To this end, we sample the full many-body wave function by applying a single atom resolved imaging scheme in momentum space. We find so-called Pauli crystals as a manifestation of higher order correlations. In contrast to true crystalline phases, these unique high-order density correlations emerge even without any interactions present. Our work lays the foundation for future studies of correlations in strongly interacting systems of many fermions.
Abstract Section I.—The exclusion principle of Pauli was introduced into the old quantum theory as an empirical fact that had been brought to light in the ordering of spectra. The new mechanics has provided some sort of explanation of the principle, for in a closed system with many electrons the mathematically possible stationary states can be separated into a number of groups, with the property that transitions between stationary states in different groups cannot occur. One of these group is made up of the stationary states corresponding occur. One of the these groups is made up of the stationary states corresponding to wave functions that are antisymmetrical in the co-ordinates of the electrons. Apart from accidental degeneracies, the stationary states in different groups have different energy values. The exclusion principle then states that only energy values belonging to the antisymmertical group are found in nature. The exclusion principle has had great success not only in explaining the spectra of helium and of more complicated atoms, but also, under the form of the Fermi-Dirac statistics, in accounting for metallic conduction and ferromagnetism. In all these phenomena we are dealing with systems is stationary states, possessing energy values which are discrete, although they may lie very close together. Now, as was first emphasised by Oppenheimer, we must also use antisymmetrical wave-functions to describe aperiodic phenomena, such as the collision between an electron and an atom. If we do not, we obtain probabilities for the formation of atoms whose wave-funtions are not antisymmetrical, as we shall show in section 4, where we consider the collision between an electron and a helium atom. A helium atom described by a symmetrical wave-function would show a singlet series in palce of the observed triplets and triplet series in place of the observed singlets. The wave-functions of open systems are essentially degenerate; the symmetical and antisymmetrical solution are not separated from one another by a finite energy difference; but for any arbitrary value of the energy (and of the other integrals of the motion) we can form a symmetrical and an antisymmetrical solution. This is somewhat fundamental difference between open and closed systems. For closed systems containing two electrons there exist only the symmetrical and the antisymmetical solution; but for open systems we might take any combination of the two. In fact, to describe an observable phenomenon such as a collision, the wave-function that it would first occur to us to use is a combination of the two. To fix our ideas we shall discuss the collision between two electrons. Our arguments could equally well be applied to the collision between an electron and a hydrogen atom, the problem originally discussed by Born; but the former is the simpler case, and perhaps illustrates our theory better.
The Pauli exclusion principle (PEP) can be considered from two aspects. First, it asserts that particles that have half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles that have integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. It is called spin-statistics connection (SSC). The physical reasons why SSC exists are still unknown. On the other hand, PEP is not reduced to SSC and can be consider from another aspect, according to it, the permutation symmetry of the total wave function can be only of two types: symmetric or antisymmetric. They both belong to one-dimensional representations of the permutation group, while other types of permutation symmetry are forbidden. However, the solution of the Schrödinger equation may have any permutation symmetry. We analyze this second aspect of PEP and demonstrate that proofs of PEP in some wide-spread textbooks on quantum mechanics, basing on the indistinguishability principle, are incorrect. The indistinguishability principle is insensitive to the permutation symmetry of wave function. So, it cannot be used as a criterion for the PEP verification. However, as follows from our analysis of possible scenarios, the permission of states with permutation symmetry more general than symmetric and antisymmetric leads to contradictions with the concepts of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the existence in our Nature particles only in symmetric and antisymmetric permutation states is not accidental, since all symmetry options for the total wave function, except the antisymmetric and symmetric, cannot be realized. From this an important conclusion follows, we may not expect that in future some unknown elementary particles that are not fermions or bosons can be discovered.