Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Information Processing

Rational protocol of quantum secure multi-party computation

Zhao Dou, Gang Xu, Xiu‐Bo Chen, Xinxin Niu, Yixian Yang

Published Jun 29, 2018• 12 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11128-018-1967-x

Related papers

Rational Secure Two-Party Computation Protocol

En Zhang, Yongquan Cai

Journal of Computer Research and Development•Jul 15, 2013•1 citation

A brief survey on secure multi-party computing in the presence of rational parties

Yilei Wang, Tao Li, Hairong Qin +4 more

Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing•Jul 2, 2015•19 citations

Classical and Quantum Secure Two-Party Computation

Severin Winkler

•Jan 1, 2012•1 citation

Social rational secure multi‐party computation

Yilei Wang, Zhe Liu, Hao Wang +1 more

SUMMARY Rational party is a new kind of parties who behave neither like honest parties nor like malicious adversaries. The crux point of rational party is the definition of the utility function, as rational parties only care about how to maximize their utility. In other words, rational parties choose the strategies, which can bring them the highest utilities. In rational secure two‐party computation protocol, the main task is how to boost mutual cooperation to complete the protocol. Social rational secure multi‐party computation (SRSMPC) means that in a social network, some distributed and rational parties with reputation properties want to jointly compute a functionality. The seemingly simple task becomes tough under three conditions. The first condition is that the network composed by parties may not be complete. That is, two parties may not be neighbors and they are connected through other parties. The second is that the network may be not secure. That is, messages may be tempered by malicious parties. The third condition is that parties may run the protocol under incomplete information scenario. That is, parties may have types and each type has a corresponding utility function. Under the first and second conditions, parties need to consider how to securely transmit messages between two parties who are not neighbors. Under the third condition, we propose the Tit‐for‐Tat strategy and prove that mutual cooperation is a sequential equilibrium between two parties. In this paper, we construct an SRSMPC protocol by using mechanism design under incomplete information to facilitate the implementation of the SRSMPC protocol within constant rounds. Meanwhile, newcomers are allowed to participate in the protocol. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first social rational secure computation protocol for multi‐party under an incomplete information scenario and an incomplete network. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience•Jul 1, 2013•16 citations

Confidentially Compare Rational Numbers under the Malicious Model

Xin Liu Xin Liu, Xiaomeng Liu Xin Liu, Dan Luo Xiaomeng Liu +2 more

Secure multi-party computation is a hotspot in the cryptography field, and it is also a significant means to realize privacy computation. The Millionaires’ problem is the most fundamental problem among them, which is the basic module of secure multi-party computation protocols. Although there are many solutions to this problem, there are few anti-malicious adversarial protocols besides protocols based on Yao’s garbled circuit. Only a few solutions have low efficiency, and there is no protocol for rational numbers comparison under the malicious model, which restricts the solution of many secure multi-party computation problems. In this paper, the possible malicious behaviors are analyzed in the existing Millionaires’ problem protocols. These behaviors are discovered and taken precautions against through the triangle area formula, zero-knowledge proof, and cut-and-choose method, so the protocol of comparing confidentially rational numbers is proposed under the malicious model. And this paper adopts the real/ideal model paradigm to prove the security of the malicious model protocol. Efficiency analysis indicates that the proposed protocol is more effective than existing protocols. The protocol of rational numbers comparison under the malicious model is more suitable for the practical applications of secure multi-party computation, which has important theoretical and practical significance.

網際網路技術學刊•May 1, 2024•0 citations

Quantum secure protocols for multiparty computations

Tapaswini Mohanty, Vikas Srivastava, Sumit Kumar Debnath +1 more

arXiv:2312.16318•Journal of Information Security and Applications•Mar 20, 2025•1 citation
SUMMARY Rational party is a new kind of parties who behave neither like honest parties nor like malicious adversaries. The crux point of rational party is the definition of the utility function, as rational parties only care about how to maximize their utility. In other words, rational parties choose the strategies, which can bring them the highest utilities. In rational secure two‐party computation protocol, the main task is how to boost mutual cooperation to complete the protocol. Social rational secure multi‐party computation (SRSMPC) means that in a social network, some distributed and rational parties with reputation properties want to jointly compute a functionality. The seemingly simple task becomes tough under three conditions. The first condition is that the network composed by parties may not be complete. That is, two parties may not be neighbors and they are connected through other parties. The second is that the network may be not secure. That is, messages may be tempered by malicious parties. The third condition is that parties may run the protocol under incomplete information scenario. That is, parties may have types and each type has a corresponding utility function. Under the first and second conditions, parties need to consider how to securely transmit messages between two parties who are not neighbors. Under the third condition, we propose the Tit‐for‐Tat strategy and prove that mutual cooperation is a sequential equilibrium between two parties. In this paper, we construct an SRSMPC protocol by using mechanism design under incomplete information to facilitate the implementation of the SRSMPC protocol within constant rounds. Meanwhile, newcomers are allowed to participate in the protocol. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first social rational secure computation protocol for multi‐party under an incomplete information scenario and an incomplete network. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Secure multi-party computation is a hotspot in the cryptography field, and it is also a significant means to realize privacy computation. The Millionaires’ problem is the most fundamental problem among them, which is the basic module of secure multi-party computation protocols. Although there are many solutions to this problem, there are few anti-malicious adversarial protocols besides protocols based on Yao’s garbled circuit. Only a few solutions have low efficiency, and there is no protocol for rational numbers comparison under the malicious model, which restricts the solution of many secure multi-party computation problems. In this paper, the possible malicious behaviors are analyzed in the existing Millionaires’ problem protocols. These behaviors are discovered and taken precautions against through the triangle area formula, zero-knowledge proof, and cut-and-choose method, so the protocol of comparing confidentially rational numbers is proposed under the malicious model. And this paper adopts the real/ideal model paradigm to prove the security of the malicious model protocol. Efficiency analysis indicates that the proposed protocol is more effective than existing protocols. The protocol of rational numbers comparison under the malicious model is more suitable for the practical applications of secure multi-party computation, which has important theoretical and practical significance.