Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Physical and Mathematical Foundations

Cord Friebe

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-78356-7_1

Related papers

Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations of 20Th-Century Physics

North-Holland mathematics studies•Jan 1, 1984•121 citations

An Unorthodox View on the Foundations of Physical Reality

J.A.J. van Leunen

This paper is telling essentials of the story of the Hilbert Book Test Model without applying the mathematical formulas. The paper cannot avoid the usage of mathematical terms, but these terms will be elucidated such that mathematical novices can still understand most of the story. The Hilbert Book Test Model is a way to investigate the part of the foundation of physical reality that cannot be observed. This foundation is necessarily simple and it can easily be comprehended by skilled scientists. However, this paper is targeted to readers that are not skilled in math.

•May 1, 2016•0 citations

Mathematical Foundations

Ming‐Xing Luo

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

The Foundation of Physical Reality - Continuity, Actualization, and the Structural Limit of Observation

Andreas Schultheis

This preprint presents a continuity-based foundation framework for physical reality. It argues that observable reality exists on the effect side of an actualization boundary experienced as the present moment, or the Now. The framework defines the foundation as absolute continuity and treats observable physical reality as the field-side domain of motion, distinction, uncertainty, measurement, structure, and relation. The paper distinguishes operational certainty from absolute certainty and argues that structural uncertainty is unavoidable for observers confined to the effect side of reality. It reclassifies force, material, geometry, time, particles, randomness, mathematical infinity, and physical constants as operationally real field-side constructs rather than foundation-side primitives. The result is not a mathematical Theory of Everything, but a classification framework for identifying where physical concepts belong relative to foundation, actualization, observation, mathematics, and uncertainty.

•Jun 15, 2026•0 citations

Physical and Mathematical Background

Sophia Denker

BesMasters•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Entropy in Foundations of Quantum Physics

Marcin Pawłowski

Entropy can be used in studies on foundations of quantum physics in many different ways, each of them using different properties of this mathematical object [...].

Entropy•Mar 24, 2020•0 citations
This paper is telling essentials of the story of the Hilbert Book Test Model without applying the mathematical formulas. The paper cannot avoid the usage of mathematical terms, but these terms will be elucidated such that mathematical novices can still understand most of the story. The Hilbert Book Test Model is a way to investigate the part of the foundation of physical reality that cannot be observed. This foundation is necessarily simple and it can easily be comprehended by skilled scientists. However, this paper is targeted to readers that are not skilled in math.
This preprint presents a continuity-based foundation framework for physical reality. It argues that observable reality exists on the effect side of an actualization boundary experienced as the present moment, or the Now. The framework defines the foundation as absolute continuity and treats observable physical reality as the field-side domain of motion, distinction, uncertainty, measurement, structure, and relation. The paper distinguishes operational certainty from absolute certainty and argues that structural uncertainty is unavoidable for observers confined to the effect side of reality. It reclassifies force, material, geometry, time, particles, randomness, mathematical infinity, and physical constants as operationally real field-side constructs rather than foundation-side primitives. The result is not a mathematical Theory of Everything, but a classification framework for identifying where physical concepts belong relative to foundation, actualization, observation, mathematics, and uncertainty.