Oblivious transfer (OT) is the most fundamental process in cryptosystems and serves as the basic building block for implementing protocols, such as the secure multi-party computation and the fair electronic contract. However, since most implementations of the Internet of Things are time-sensitive, existing works that are based on traditional public cryptosystems are not efficient or secure under quantum machine attacks. In this paper, we argued that the fastest known 1-out-of-n oblivious transfer (OTn1) protocol, which was proposed by Chou, cannot achieve semantic security and is time-consuming due to exponent arithmetic of large parameters. Utilizing NTRUEncrypt and OT extension, we devised a one-round postquantum secure OTn1protocol that is also proved to be active and adaptively secure under the universal composability framework. Compared with Chou's protocol, the computational overheads of our scheme are approximately 6 and 1.7 times smaller on the sender and receiver sides, in line with the standard security level.
Oblivious transfer (OT) is the most fundamental process in cryptosystems and serves as the basic building block for implementing protocols, such as the secure multi-party computation and the fair electronic contract. However, since most implementations of the Internet of Things are time-sensitive, existing works that are based on traditional public cryptosystems are not efficient or secure under quantum machine attacks. In this paper, we argued that the fastest known 1-out-of-n oblivious transfer (OTn1) protocol, which was proposed by Chou, cannot achieve semantic security and is time-consuming due to exponent arithmetic of large parameters. Utilizing NTRUEncrypt and OT extension, we devised a one-round postquantum secure OTn1protocol that is also proved to be active and adaptively secure under the universal composability framework. Compared with Chou's protocol, the computational overheads of our scheme are approximately 6 and 1.7 times smaller on the sender and receiver sides, in line with the standard security level.
Oblivious Transfer (OT) is a fundamental cryptographic primitive enabling privacy-preserving computation and constitutes a core building block for secure multi-party computation while supporting a wide range of security-sensitive applications: private information retrieval, zero-knowledge proofs, and password-authenticated key exchange, to cite a few. While recent advances in OT extension have significantly reduced amortised costs, their reliance on batches of random base OTs and substantial pre-computation phases limits their practicality in scenarios where the number of transfers is modest or where communication latency and client-side computation are critical constraints. In such settings, efficient base OT protocols remain both relevant and necessary. In this work, we introduce I-(OT)2, a novel base 1-out-of-2 OT protocol grounded in the quadratic residuosity problem, specifically designed to minimise receiver-side computation and interaction. Our construction is particularly appealing on client--server architectures in which the receiver operates on low-power hardware, such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Through a lightweight offline pre-computation phase, I-(OT)2 shifts the on-transfer computational burden almost entirely to the Sender, while reducing online communication to only six messages and four digests exchanged. We provide a detailed description of the protocol, accompanied by a formal proof of its security. Moreover, to demonstrate the viability of I-(OT)2, we also present an open-source proof-of-concept implementation (in C language) evaluated on real IoT hardware. Results are staggering: for 128-bit security using a 3072-bit RSA modulus, the receiver incurs an average online cost per OT as low as 2.80 μs on desktop platforms and 39.90 μs on IoT devices, more than 10× faster than the well known SimplestOT.
Oblivious transfer (OT) protocol is an essential tool in cryptography that provides a wide range of applications such as secure multi-party computation, private information retrieval, private set intersection, contract signing, and privacy-preserving location-based services. The OT protocol has different variants such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. In the OT (one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , and OT extension) protocol, the sender has a set of messages, whereas the receiver has a key. The receiver sends that key to the sender in a secure way; the sender cannot get any information about the received key. The sender encrypts every message by operating on every message using the received key and sends all the encrypted messages to the receiver. The receiver is able to extract only the required message using his key. However, in the k -out-of- n OT protocol, the receiver sends a set of k keys to the sender, and in replay, the sender sends all the encrypted messages. The receiver uses his keys and extracts the required messages, but it cannot gain any information about the messages that it has not requested. Generally, the OT protocol requires high communication and computation cost if we transfer millions of oblivious messages. The OT extension protocol provides a solution for this, where the receiver transfers a set of keys to the sender by executing a few numbers of OT protocols. Then, the sender encrypts all the messages using cheap symmetric key cryptography with the help of a received set of keys and transfers millions of oblivious messages to the receiver. In this work, we present different variants of OT protocols such as one-out-of-2, one-out-of- n , k -out-of- n , and OT extension. Furthermore, we cover various aspects of theoretical security guarantees such as semi-honest and malicious adversaries, universally composable, used techniques, computation, and communication efficiency aspects. From the analysis, we found that the semi-honest adversary-based OT protocols required low communication and computation costs as compared to malicious adversary-based OT protocols.
Oblivious transfer (OT) protocol is a fundamental cryptographical tool and widely used as a building block of secure computation. In this work, we propose two efficient t -out-of- n oblivious transfer schemes with the designated receiver. A common advantage of the two schemes is efficient. The total computation cost of the sender and the receiver is n +2 t +1 modular exponentiations in first scheme that is three-round, and the total one of the sender and receiver is n +3 t modular exponentiations in second scheme that is two-round. Another advantage of both schemes is designable.
Oblivious Transfer (OT) is a fundamental cryptographic protocol that finds a number of applications, in particular, as an essential building block for two-party and multi-party computation. We construct a round-optimal (2 rounds) universally composable (UC) protocol for oblivious transfer secure against active adaptive adversaries from any OW-CPA secure public-key encryption scheme with certain properties in the random oracle model (ROM). In terms of computation, our protocol only requires the generation of a public/secret-key pair, two encryption operations and one decryption operation, apart from a few calls to the random oracle. In~terms of communication, our protocol only requires the transfer of one public-key, two ciphertexts, and three binary strings of roughly the same size as the message. Next, we show how to instantiate our construction under the low noise LPN, McEliece, QC-MDPC, LWE, and CDH assumptions. Our instantiations based on the low noise LPN, McEliece, and QC-MDPC assumptions are the first UC-secure OT protocols based on coding assumptions to achieve: 1) adaptive security, 2) optimal round complexity, 3) low communication and computational complexities. Previous results in this setting only achieved static security and used costly cut-and-choose techniques.Our instantiation based on CDH achieves adaptive security at the small cost of communicating only two more group elements as compared to the gap-DH based Simplest OT protocol of Chou and Orlandi (Latincrypt 15), which only achieves static security in the ROM.
Oblivious transfer (OT) is one of the most fundamental primitives in cryptography and is widely used in protocols for secure two-party and multi-party computation. As secure com-putation becomes more practical, the need for practical large scale oblivious transfer protocols is becoming more evident. Oblivious transfer extensions are protocols that enable a relatively small number of “base-OTs ” to be utilized to compute a very large number of OTs at low cost. In the semi-honest setting, Ishai et al. (CRYPTO 2003) presented an OT extension protocol for which the cost of each OT (beyond the base-OTs) is just a few hash function operations. In the malicious setting, Nielsen et al. (CRYPTO 2012) presented an efficient OT extension protocol for the setting of active adversaries, that is secure in the random oracle model. In this work, we present an OT extension protocol for the setting of malicious adversaries that is more efficient and uses less communication than previous works. In addition, our protocol can be proven secure in both the random oracle model, and in the standard model with a type of correlation robustness. Given the importance of OT in many secure computation protocols, increasing the efficiency of OT extensions is another important step forward to making secure
Oblivious transfer (OT) protocol is a fundamental building block of cryptography and can be applied widely in many fields. A secure oblivious transfer protocol is supposed to ensure the privacy of both senders and receivers. The privacy of receivers means that the information being selected by receivers would never be revealed to senders. On the other hand, the privacy of senders means that receivers have no further information except for the one that has been selected. In this case, senders are able to deceive receivers by sending same messages. Likewise, in existing 1-out-of-n OT protocols, malicious senders can make all the n messages the same, so that receivers will always get the specific one assigned by senders. This indicates that privacy of receivers wouldnt work under the 1-out-of-n OT protocol. To prevent this kind of attack, this paper provides a general framework on how to design a secure OT protocol based on commutative and ciphertext equality test and take RSA as an example to explain how the protocol is processed.