Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The European Physical Journal B

About the relation of electron–electron interaction potentials with exchange and correlation functionals

Adrián Gómez Pueyo, Alberto Castro

Published Jun 1, 2018• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1140/epjb/e2018-90109-6

Related papers

Electron–Electron Interaction and Correlations

Jenő Sólyom

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2010•1 citation

Spatial-Order Hierarchy of Time-Dependent Exchange-Correlation Potential

Naoki Negishi

Exact time-dependent density-functional theory (DFT) separates the exchange-correlation potential into interaction and kinetic-correlation components, but the structural relation between them remains unclear. We establish a representability constraint based on the off-diagonal expansion of the one-electron reduced density matrix (1RDM) relative to a chosen reference dynamics. A non-zero linear off-diagonal term of the 1RDM generates a current density beyond the representable space of the reference, while a nontrivial quadratic off-diagonal structure activates the kinetic-correlation component. The resulting hierarchy provides a criterion for assessing, from the spatial locality of electronic correlation, whether a given exchange-correlation functional or a more general electron-correlation approximation remains adequate. In a one-dimensional two-electron correlation quench, retaining the exact interaction component while setting the kinetic component to zero suppresses the density broadening of the exact evolution. These results establish a spatial-order hierarchy among the force components governing the density dynamics and provide an exact constraint for the construction and assessment of nonadiabatic approximations.

quant-pharXiv:2608.01483•Aug 4, 2026•0 citations

Many-electron theory: Density functional approach generalized to treat spin eigenfunctions and relation to spinless low-order density matrices

N. H. March

Many-electron theory is treated here with much attention focused on the synthesis of the density functional and density matrix theory. This synthesis shows that the exchange–correlation potential, normally obtained as the functional derivative with respect to the electron density of an assumed approximate exchange–correlation energy, can be written exactly in terms of the “near-diagonal” behavior of the fully interacting first-order density matrix and the diagonal of the second-order density matrix, thereby bypassing the functional derivative. Also involved, since the exchange–correlation potential is an “artifact” of reducing the many-electron Schrödinger equation to one-body Slater–Kohn–Sham equations, are the one-body orbitals derived from these latter equations, not just the density thereby obtained. This situation has then motivated a discussion of what constraints are placed on the low-order density matrices of atoms and molecules, described by an assumed spin-independent Hamiltonian, by the requirement that these matrices are constructed from an N-electron wave function which is an eigenfunction of the spin operators S2 and Sz. Some briefer discussion is added on the optimally convergent determinantal expansion of such an N-electron wave function, the relation between Brueckner and Löwdin natural orbitals being commented on as a by-product. In this latter context, it is noted that the exchange-only potential of density functional theory can be represented as a sum of two line integrals, each of which is path-dependent, the sum being, of course, path-independent. But in addition to knowledge of Slater–Kohn–Sham orbitals appearing as in the Harbola–Sahni exchange-only potential (which is one of the path-dependent terms), there is a kinetic correction. This involves Löwdin natural orbitals and their occupation numbers, but only now in the weak coupling limit of the electron–electron interaction, as emphasized in the kinetic “correction” to the Harbola–Sahni formula exhibited by Levy and the writer. Some directions for further work are briefly set out. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 163–176, 1999

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1999•2 citations

Electron—Electron Interaction and Electron Correlation

Nobuo Tsuda, Keiichirō Nasu, Atsushi Fujimori +1 more

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 2000•2 citations

ELECTRON CORRELATION STUDIES BY MEANS OF ELECTRON-PAIR DENSITY FUNCTIONS

E. Valderrama, Xavier Fradera, I. Silanes +2 more

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Dec 1, 2002•2 citations

The exact exchange–correlation potential in time-dependent density functional theory: Choreographing electrons with steps and peaks

Davood B. Dar, Lionel Lacombe, Neepa T. Maitra

The time-dependent exchange–correlation potential has the unusual task of directing fictitious non-interacting electrons to move with exactly the same probability density as true interacting electrons. This has intriguing implications for its structure, especially in the non-perturbative regime, leading to step and peak features that cannot be captured by bootstrapping any ground-state functional approximation. We review what has been learned about these features in the exact exchange–correlation potential of time-dependent density functional theory in the past decade or so and implications for the performance of simulations when electrons are driven far from any ground state.

arXiv:2205.03691•Chemical Physics Reviews•Sep 1, 2022•8 citations
Exact time-dependent density-functional theory (DFT) separates the exchange-correlation potential into interaction and kinetic-correlation components, but the structural relation between them remains unclear. We establish a representability constraint based on the off-diagonal expansion of the one-electron reduced density matrix (1RDM) relative to a chosen reference dynamics. A non-zero linear off-diagonal term of the 1RDM generates a current density beyond the representable space of the reference, while a nontrivial quadratic off-diagonal structure activates the kinetic-correlation component. The resulting hierarchy provides a criterion for assessing, from the spatial locality of electronic correlation, whether a given exchange-correlation functional or a more general electron-correlation approximation remains adequate. In a one-dimensional two-electron correlation quench, retaining the exact interaction component while setting the kinetic component to zero suppresses the density broadening of the exact evolution. These results establish a spatial-order hierarchy among the force components governing the density dynamics and provide an exact constraint for the construction and assessment of nonadiabatic approximations.
Many-electron theory is treated here with much attention focused on the synthesis of the density functional and density matrix theory. This synthesis shows that the exchange–correlation potential, normally obtained as the functional derivative with respect to the electron density of an assumed approximate exchange–correlation energy, can be written exactly in terms of the “near-diagonal” behavior of the fully interacting first-order density matrix and the diagonal of the second-order density matrix, thereby bypassing the functional derivative. Also involved, since the exchange–correlation potential is an “artifact” of reducing the many-electron Schrödinger equation to one-body Slater–Kohn–Sham equations, are the one-body orbitals derived from these latter equations, not just the density thereby obtained. This situation has then motivated a discussion of what constraints are placed on the low-order density matrices of atoms and molecules, described by an assumed spin-independent Hamiltonian, by the requirement that these matrices are constructed from an N-electron wave function which is an eigenfunction of the spin operators S2 and Sz. Some briefer discussion is added on the optimally convergent determinantal expansion of such an N-electron wave function, the relation between Brueckner and Löwdin natural orbitals being commented on as a by-product. In this latter context, it is noted that the exchange-only potential of density functional theory can be represented as a sum of two line integrals, each of which is path-dependent, the sum being, of course, path-independent. But in addition to knowledge of Slater–Kohn–Sham orbitals appearing as in the Harbola–Sahni exchange-only potential (which is one of the path-dependent terms), there is a kinetic correction. This involves Löwdin natural orbitals and their occupation numbers, but only now in the weak coupling limit of the electron–electron interaction, as emphasized in the kinetic “correction” to the Harbola–Sahni formula exhibited by Levy and the writer. Some directions for further work are briefly set out. ©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Quant Chem 74: 163–176, 1999
The time-dependent exchange–correlation potential has the unusual task of directing fictitious non-interacting electrons to move with exactly the same probability density as true interacting electrons. This has intriguing implications for its structure, especially in the non-perturbative regime, leading to step and peak features that cannot be captured by bootstrapping any ground-state functional approximation. We review what has been learned about these features in the exact exchange–correlation potential of time-dependent density functional theory in the past decade or so and implications for the performance of simulations when electrons are driven far from any ground state.