Quantum field theory of refraction and reflection of light

Richard Threlkeld Cox, J. C. Hubbard

Francesco R. Ruggeri

Quantum mechanics is known for its “square root” probability i.e. the existence of a wavefunction W(x) such that P(x) = W*(x)W(x). This begs the question: Why is this the case? In Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory of the photon, a similar situation arises except that one has energy density instead of P(x) which consists of .5C1 Electric field* Electric field + .5c2 Magnetic field*Magnetic field. The “square root” object is a physical observable (Electric field, Magnetic field) which both behave as cos(-Et+px) and so, more accessible than W(x). Alternatively one may use Fermat’s least time principle for light to show that i two dimensional problems (reflection/refraction) d/dx (used in extremization) is really the operator of momentum in that direction i.e. a spatial invariant direction. Thus A=px such that dA/dx=p = x component of momentum which may be generalized to A=-Et+p dot r. (p.r) may be written as -i ln(exp(ip dot r) with exp(i p dot r) representing a “kind of probability”. This probability may be considered a square root probability because for uniform motion (light) all x points along a ray should have equal probability. Thus exp(i p dot r) maps into a constant which happens if one takes the modulus. Both of the above approaches (using continuity at x or a kind of conservation of probability and a momentum) may be used to solve the problem of an incident beam of light moving in the positive x direction hitting a medium and both reflecting and refracting. For example see (1). The goal is to find the two intensity values associated with the reflected and refracted beams assuming the incident intensity is known. In this note, we take a different approach to finding the two unknowns, one that does not use the idea of the electric field proportional to cos(-Et+px) or the probability exp(ipx). We wish to solve the problem using only the idea of information and stress the importance of beginning with energy conservation a priori unlike the two approaches listed above. We postulate that there are two sets of information in this problem. First there is the notion of Energy = p(momentum in a vacuum) n c/n where n is the index of refraction. Thus the incident and reflected light are associated with pc1,c1 and the refracted with pc2, c2 with energy being the same for all. Second there is the idea of conservation of energy i.e. if ten photons with energy E hit the surface and a10 reflect and (1-a)10 refract, then the sum of the refracted and reflected energy equals the initial energy. Energy is then equated with intensity through Intensity/c = energy (1). Using only these two pieces of information we argue one should be able to find the intensity of both the reflected and refracted ray. This leads to an immediate problem because there are two unknowns and only one equation, namely conservation of energy i.e. I(A)/c1 = I(B)/c1 + I(C)/c2 where A is the incident beam, B the reflected and C the refracted. Writing as: I(A)/c1 - I(B)/c1 = I(C)/c2 (i.e. a spatial instead of time grouping) suggests a possible solution might be to employ a difference of squares noting that 1/c = p/E with E being a constant in the problem. Thus one may reduce the problem to A+B=C and p1A-p1B=p2C. This is of the form of a new kind of “square root” type probability, but leads to two equations with two unknowns (A is assumed to be known) which allows the problem to be solved.

Maciej Lewenstein, Li You

Dirk John Pons, Arion Pons, Ariel M. Pons +1 more

Optical effects such as reflection and refraction are conventionally best described by Electromagnetic Wave theory, at least when they involve beams of light. However that theory does not explain why single photons should also show such behaviour. This paper shows that optical effects can also be explained from a cordus particuloid perspective. Several principles are proposed for the interaction of a cordus photon with an optical surface, and these are used to explain reflection and subsequently refraction. The formula for critical angle is derived from a particuloid basis. The cordus and wave theory perspectives are compared and contrasted. The significance of this work is that the cordus mechanics explains the reflection and refraction behaviour of both single photons as well as beams of light, so it is a more universal explanation.

S. A. Brown, Bryan J. Dalton

The generalization of the quasi mode theory of macroscopic quantization in quantum optics and cavity QED presented in the previous paper, is applied to provide a fully quantum theoretic derivation of the laws of reflection and refraction at a boundary. The quasi mode picture of this process involves the annihilation of a photon travelling in the incident region quasi mode, and the subsequent creation of a photon in either the incident region or transmitted region quasi modes. The derivation of the laws of reflection and refraction is achieved through the dual application of the quasi mode theory and a quantum scattering theory based on the Heisenberg picture. Formal expressions from scattering theory are given for the reflection and transmission coefficients. The behaviour of the intensity for a localized one photon wave packet coming in at time minus infinity from the incident direction is examined and it is shown that at time plus infinity, the light intensity is only significant where the classical laws of reflection and refraction predict. The occurrence of both refraction and reflection is dependent upon the quasi mode theory coupling constants between incident and transmitted region quasi modes being nonzero, and it is seen that the contributions to such coupling constants come from the overlap of the mode functions in the boundary layer region, as might be expected from a microscopic theory.