Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

UNITEXT for physics

Elements of Hamiltonian Mechanics and Electromagnetism

Alessandro Teta

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-77893-8_1

Related papers

Gauging non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

H F Jones

We address the problem of coupling non-Hermitian systems, treated as fundamental rather than effective theories, to the electromagnetic field. In such theories the observables are not the x and p appearing in the Hamiltonian, but quantities X and P constructed by means of the metric operator. Following the analogous procedure of gauging a global symmetry in Hermitian quantum mechanics we find that the corresponding gauge transformation in X implies minimal substitution in the form P → P − e A ( X ). We discuss how the relevant matrix elements governing electromagnetic transitions may be calculated in the special case of the Swanson Hamiltonian, where the equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian h is local, and in the more generic example of the imaginary cubic interaction, where H is local but h is not.

arXiv:0811.0305•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 6, 2009•12 citations

Hamiltonian methods in electrodynamics and quantum mechanics

Iu. G. Pavlenko

•Jan 1, 1985•8 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Electrodynamics

Jaroslav Zamastil, Jakub Benda

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2017•7 citations

Tight-binding-like expressions for the continuous-space electromagnetic coupling Hamiltonian

Timothy B. Boykin

In quantum mechanics texts one sometimes encounters the unqualified (and generally untrue) assertion that the solution of the Schrödinger equation for a charged particle in the presence of an externally applied vector potential can be found from that in the absence of the vector potential simply via multiplication with an r-dependent phase factor. The confusion caused by this assertion is only increased when one examines the expression for the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian including electromagnetic interactions (via the vector potential) appropriate for a tight-binding model, for this expression indeed takes a different form from that of the usual minimal coupling Hamiltonian in continuous space. Motivated by the tight-binding (i.e., discretized) result, we derive its continuous-space analog. We show that the aforementioned perplexing assertion actually arises from a confusion between the wavefunction and the matrix elements of the continuous-space Hamiltonian in the position basis and discuss both the tight-binding and continuous-space expressions.

American Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 2001•22 citations

Gauging non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

H. F. Jones

We address the problem of coupling non-Hermitian systems, treated as fundamental rather than effective theories, to the electromagnetic field. In such theories the observables are not the x and p appearing in the Hamiltonian, but quantities X and P constructed by means of the metric operator. Following the analogous procedure of gauging a global symmetry in Hermitian quantum mechanics we find that the corresponding gauge transformation in X implies minimal substitution in the form P → P −eA(X). We discuss how the relevant matrix elements governing electromagnetic transitions may be calculated in the special case of the Swanson Hamiltonian, where the equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian h is local, and in the more generic example of the imaginary cubic interaction, where H is local but h is not. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ca, 11.30.Er, 02.30.Mv 1

•Jan 1, 2009•7 citations

Basic Hamiltonian Mechanics

Maurice A. de Gosson

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations
We address the problem of coupling non-Hermitian systems, treated as fundamental rather than effective theories, to the electromagnetic field. In such theories the observables are not the x and p appearing in the Hamiltonian, but quantities X and P constructed by means of the metric operator. Following the analogous procedure of gauging a global symmetry in Hermitian quantum mechanics we find that the corresponding gauge transformation in X implies minimal substitution in the form P → P − e A ( X ). We discuss how the relevant matrix elements governing electromagnetic transitions may be calculated in the special case of the Swanson Hamiltonian, where the equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian h is local, and in the more generic example of the imaginary cubic interaction, where H is local but h is not.
In quantum mechanics texts one sometimes encounters the unqualified (and generally untrue) assertion that the solution of the Schrödinger equation for a charged particle in the presence of an externally applied vector potential can be found from that in the absence of the vector potential simply via multiplication with an r-dependent phase factor. The confusion caused by this assertion is only increased when one examines the expression for the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian including electromagnetic interactions (via the vector potential) appropriate for a tight-binding model, for this expression indeed takes a different form from that of the usual minimal coupling Hamiltonian in continuous space. Motivated by the tight-binding (i.e., discretized) result, we derive its continuous-space analog. We show that the aforementioned perplexing assertion actually arises from a confusion between the wavefunction and the matrix elements of the continuous-space Hamiltonian in the position basis and discuss both the tight-binding and continuous-space expressions.
We address the problem of coupling non-Hermitian systems, treated as fundamental rather than effective theories, to the electromagnetic field. In such theories the observables are not the x and p appearing in the Hamiltonian, but quantities X and P constructed by means of the metric operator. Following the analogous procedure of gauging a global symmetry in Hermitian quantum mechanics we find that the corresponding gauge transformation in X implies minimal substitution in the form P → P −eA(X). We discuss how the relevant matrix elements governing electromagnetic transitions may be calculated in the special case of the Swanson Hamiltonian, where the equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian h is local, and in the more generic example of the imaginary cubic interaction, where H is local but h is not. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ca, 11.30.Er, 02.30.Mv 1