The resource theory of incompatibility

Jatin Ghai, Arindam Mitra

Quantum resources are certain features of the quantum world that provide advantages in certain information-theoretic, thermodynamic, or other useful operational tasks that are outside the realm of what classical theories can achieve. Quantum resource theories provide us with an elegant framework for studying these resources quantitatively and rigorously. While numerous state-based quantum resource theories have already been investigated, and to some extent, measurement-based resource theories have also been explored, instrument-based resource theories remain largely unexplored, with only a few notable exceptions. As quantum instruments are devices that provide both the classical outcomes of induced measurements and the post-measurement quantum states, they are quite important, especially for scenarios where multiple parties sequentially act on a quantum system. In this work, we study several instrument-based resource theories, namely (1) the resource theory of information preservability, (2) the resource theory of (strong) entanglement preservability, (3) the resource theory of (strong) incompatibility preservability, (4) the resource theory of traditional incompatibility, and (5) the resource theory of parallel incompatibility. Furthermore, we outline the hierarchies of these instrument-based resources and provide measures to quantify them. We then also established a relationship between our resource measure and the advantage in an information-theoretic task. In short, we provide a detailed framework for a wide variety of instrument-based quantum resource theories.

Chao-Hsien Wu, Franco Nori, Huan-Yu Ku

Measurement incompatibility is a fundamental quantum resource that enables advantages in many quantum information tasks, including cryptography and communication. However, unavoidable interactions between a system and its environment can degrade or even completely destroy measurement incompatibility; such a process is referred to as a measurement-incompatibility-annihilating channel. Recently, the capability of noisy quantum dynamics to preserve measurement incompatibility has been characterized within the resource theory of measurement incompatibility preservability. This motivates studying how to purify the preservation of measurement incompatibility and how to activate it from a measurement-incompatibility-annihilating channel. To this end, we first introduce our figures of merit as robustness-based resource monotones within this resource theory. We demonstrate that while pre-filtering operations can strengthen measurement incompatibility preservability, they cannot activate it from an incompatibility-annihilating channel, establishing a no-go theorem. Furthermore, we explicitly demonstrate that an incompatibility-annihilating channel can be stochastically activated via post-filtering operations. Our results provide a practical framework for exploiting measurement incompatibility in quantum information processing.

Rafael Chaves

Max Dresden

Francesco Buscemi, Kodai Kobayashi, Shintaro Minagawa +2 more

While there is general consensus on the definition of incompatible POVMs, moving up to the level of instruments one finds a much less clear situation, with mathematically different and logically independent definitions of incompatibility. Here we close this gap by introducing the notion of q − c o m p a t i b i l i t y , which unifies different notions of POVMs, channels, and instruments incompatibility into one hierarchy of resource theories of communication between separated parties. The resource theories that we obtain are c o m p l e t e , in the sense that they contain complete families of free operations and monotones providing necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a transformation. Furthermore, our framework is fully o p e r a t i o n a l , in the sense that free transformations are characterized explicitly, in terms of local operations aided by causally-constrained directed classical communication, and all monotones possess a game-theoretic interpretation making them experimentally measurable in principle. We are thus able to pinpoint exactly what each notion of incompatibility consists of, in terms of information-theoretic resources.

A. C. S. Costa, R. M. Angelo