It is well known that the mass of a particle has properties different from Newtonian mechanics. First, it is speed-dependent. Second, it is convertible to energy. These properties were generally thought to be derived from the principle of relativity (PR). We have conducted a careful examination of the historical records and found that the non-Newtonian properties of mass were derived not so much based on PR, but more based on Einstein’s intuitive thinking that radiation and matters behave similarly. This gives us a hint: Since both photon and electron can behave as a particle as well as a wave, can such a wave nature account for the deviations from Newtonian mechanics? Thus, we have developed a wave model to describe the motion of a free particle with or without rest mass. We found that both the speed-dependence of mass and the mass-energy equivalence can indeed be derived based on the wave properties of a particle. This wave hypothesis has several advantages; it can naturally explain why particles can be created in the vacuum and why a particle cannot travel faster than the speed of light.
It is well known that the mass of a particle has properties different from Newtonian mechanics. First, it is speed-dependent. Second, it is convertible to energy. These properties were generally thought to be derived from the principle of relativity (PR). We have conducted a careful examination of the historical records and found that the non-Newtonian properties of mass were derived not so much based on PR, but more based on Einstein’s intuitive thinking that radiation and matters behave similarly. This gives us a hint: Since both photon and electron can behave as a particle as well as a wave, can such a wave nature account for the deviations from Newtonian mechanics? Thus, we have developed a wave model to describe the motion of a free particle with or without rest mass. We found that both the speed-dependence of mass and the mass-energy equivalence can indeed be derived based on the wave properties of a particle. This wave hypothesis has several advantages; it can naturally explain why particles can be created in the vacuum and why a particle cannot travel faster than the speed of light.
It was predicted by Einstein that energy and mass can be converted between each other. But why? Energy and mass are two very different physical concepts. How can they be exchanged with each other? We think the key to answer this question is to recall that a particle can behave like a wave. Particle properties like energy and momentum are known to be related to their corresponding wave properties (frequency and wave vector). Mass is clearly a particle property; is it also related to a wave property? This study suggests that it is. We found that mass and energy appear to share similar physical nature in the wave perspective. Both of them are related to the curvature of bending the vacuum medium during the propagation of the excitation wave. This similarity explains why they are convertible.
In the wave-particle duality, a free particle can be considered as a wave packet. Is there a wave property that corresponds to the rest mass of the particle? This is an interesting question that has not been extensively explored before. We suggest that this problem may be approached by treating the rest mass on the same footing as energy and momentum. Here we demonstrate that, by assuming that the matter wave of a particle behaves like a photon, one could derive the mass-energy relation from the solution of a simplified wave equation. This solution suggests that the rest mass of a particle is associated with a "transverse wave number", which characterizes the radial variation of the wave function in the transverse plane. This finding has several appealing features. For example, it shows a consistent geometrical relationship between mass, energy and momentum in both the wave and particle perspectives. Also, it predicts that a massless particle must travel at the constant speed of light. Furthermore, from a philosophical point of view, this model suggests that the mass-energy relation attributed to the special theory of relativity may have a root in the wave-particle duality. Indeed, it is shown that the Klein-Gordon equation can be derived naturally based on this model.
The long history of the dispute among physicists as to whether matter is composed of particles or waves is reviewed. A turning point came at the dawn of the 20th century in the form of the de Broglie momentum-wavelength and Bohr/Planck energy frequency relations. It was on this basis that Schrödinger developed a quantum mechanical differential equation whose solution came to be known as a wave function. The Born Interpretation of these functions holds that their absolute square constitutes a probability distribution which has been used successfully to make predictions of the properties of the system under discussion. It is pointed out that the phenomenon of light refraction played a key role in the development of both Newton’s corpuscular theory of light and the competing theory of Huygens which looks upon light as consisting exclusively of waves. It is shown that Newton’s failure to predict the decrease in the speed of light as it passes from air into water was not because of his belief in the particle composition of light, but rather because he not did anticipate that the mass of a photon changes upon entering a medium of higher index of refraction n. By assuming that the energy E of light is equal pc/n, where p is the momentum of the photons and c is the speed of light in free space, it is shown that the experimental dependence of the speed the light on its wavelength as it passes through a transparent medium is derived successfully through the use of Hamilton’s Canonical Equations and Newton’s Second Law of Kinetics. It is suggested that the relationship between particles and waves can be understood by noting that the localized properties of matter exhibit themselves in experiments such as the photoelectric effect where attention can be concentrated on the behavior of a single particle. The corresponding wave properties occur when large numbers of particles are observed under exactly similar circumstances, as for example in electron diffraction. ...........
To describe Light, Newton used a Particle, which, on the one hand, is an element, invariant in space and time, but, on the other hand, whose properties depend on the Color of Light. This dependence of the property of this element is similar to the dependence of the kinetic energy of a material point on speed. But this abstract point does not have the Rest Mass invariant for all speeds. This initial contradiction was simply taken for the specificity of a given particle called a photon, which Einstein linked with the Planck's quantum of energy. Newton's corpuscular theory of light initially encountered difficulties in describing the interference and diffraction of light. But the description of coherent light will raise the question of the size-geometry of this elementary particle. Taking into account the geometry of a photon allows us to really, and not abstractly, show its invariant specificity, which ensures the stitching not only of individual photons into a coherent wave, but also stitching of the corpuscular and wave theory. In this case, the postulated Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is translated into the mathematical property of the Fourier transform, which determines measurability. Moreover, Newton's Elementary Particle shows how to determine the real specificity of a material particle that has lost its Mass invariance due to its Einstein dependence on velocity and, taking into account the principle of Logarithmic Relativity, allows us to correctly systematize Elementary (Fundamental) Particles.
Following the spirit of de Broglie and Einstein, we think the concepts of matter and radiation can be unified. We know a particle propagates like a wave; its motion is described by certain wave equations. At this point, it is not clear what the wave function represents. Besides the statistical meaning suggested by the Copenhagen interpretation, does the wave function represent any physical motion? For photon, we know it is an electro-magnetic wave. But what about particles with rest mass, such as an electron? To investigate the physical nature of matter wave, we propose that: (1) Like the photon, a particle is an excitation wave of a real physical field. (2) Different types of particles are different excitation modes of the same field. Based on this thinking, we show that the concept of quantum mechanics can be a natural extension of classical mechanics. By critically analyzing the transition from classical physics to quantum physics, we found a new physical meaning for the quantum wave function. This work suggests that various quantum wave equations, including the Klein-Gordon equation, the Dirac equation and the Schrodinger equation, could have a common base relating to the Basic Wave Equation of the matter wave. This work has some interesting implications. It suggests a possible way to explain the origin of visible matters and dark matters in our universe.
In Part I we noted that Fermat’s least time principle was equivalent to conservation of momentum in the direction of an invariant spatial variable and that this principle is contained in the dispersion relation E=pc for a light which is strictly a wave relationship. We then argued that this wave relationship should somehow be extended to a particle with rest mass because such a particle may bounce off a mirror like light. To make the connection we wrote 0 = -Et+(px)x +(py)y for light with r/t=c and constant = -Et+(px)x + (py)y for a free particle with rest mass. In both cases Fermat’s principle is contained and is equivalent to conservation of momentum in the x direction. The form -Et+px, however, suggests a wavelength proportional to 1/p and a frequency proportional to 1/E for both light and a free particle with rest mass. We argue in this note that the wavelength represents spatial information which may show conservation (e.g. of momentum in a particular direction). Thus the focus of Part I was to link a free particle with rest mass to the wave formalism of light. Newtonian mechanics describes a free particle with rest mass as well as one moving in a potential without any need for a wavelength or frequency. In fact, for light E=pc means p→pn and c→c/n where n is the index of refraction means that E remains constant. For a particle with rest mass (nonrelativistic) E = pp/2m + V(x). A change in p means one needs the potential to absorb or yield energy to keep E constant which is different from light. Given that Newtonian mechanics describes particles with rest mass one may ask: Why bother to try to link a free particle with light and Fermat’s principle as done in Part I? The answer is that a free particle (with rest mass) diffracts or shows interference just like light in experiments. Furthemore -Et+px which suggests a wavelength proportional to 1/p and frequency proportional to 1/E is equivalent to the free particle action: -mo t sqrt(1-vv/cc) (relativistic) and .5 mo t vv (nonrelativistic) with v=x/t. Thus if Lagrangian/Hamiltonian formalism is identical to Newtonian mechanics we argue that the idea of wavelength and frequency is already present. It is not manifest because one deals with averages in pp/2m + V(x) = E. To see how wavelength may be incorporated in Newtonian conservation of energy, consider a free particle in a potential i.e. E= pp/2m + V(x). Next consider knocking out the particle so it has constant momentum. We argue that such a particle should exhibit wave-like behavour i.e be described in a manner linking it with light/Fermat’s principle e.g. be described by exp(ipx). Fermat’s principle already suggests that d/dx → p so -id/dx exp(ipx) = p exp(ipx) is an eigenfunction. We then argue that if exp(ipx) describes the particle when it is knocked out of the bound state, this information should still exist while it is within the bound state. Thus we suggest the form: W(x)= Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx) as describing the particle within a bound state. On average one has Newton’s conservation of energy result, but the idea that a particle may be knocked out and should behave as a wave is also present. Furthermore the various exp(ipx) interfere so the wave nature is also present in the bound state.