Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

New (and Old) Proof Systems for Lattice Problems

Navid Alamati, Chris Peikert, Noah Stephens-Davidowitz

Published Jan 1, 2018• 11 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-76581-5_21

Related papers

Generating Hard Instances of Lattice Problems

Miklós Ajtai

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity•Jan 1, 1996•595 citations

Tensor networks—a new tool for old problems

Subir Sachdev A

A new renormalization group approach that maps lattice problems to tensor networks may hold the key to solving seemingly intractable models of strongly correlated systems in any dimension.

arXiv:1006.0675•Physics•Oct 26, 2009•14 citations

Hash Proof Systems over Lattices Revisited

Fabrice Benhamouda, Olivier Blazy, Léo Ducas +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2018•44 citations

The hardness of approximate optima in lattices, codes, and systems of linear equations

Sanjeev Arora, László Babai, Jacques Stern +1 more

We prove the following about the Nearest Lattice Vector Problem (in any l/sub p/ norm), the Nearest Code-word Problem for binary codes, the problem of learning a halfspace in the presence of errors, and some other problems. 1. Approximating the optimum within any constant factor is NP-hard. 2. If for some /spl epsiv/>0 there exists a polynomial time algorithm that approximates the optimum within a factor of 2/sup log(0.5-/spl epsiv/)/ /sup n/ then NP is in quasi-polynomial deterministic time: NP/spl sube/DTIME(n/sup poly(log/ /sup n)/). Moreover, we show that result 2 also holds for the Shortest Lattice Vector Problem in the l/sub /spl infin// norm. Improving the factor 2/sup log(0.5-/spl epsiv/)/ /sup n/ to /spl radic/(dim) for either of the lattice problems would imply the hardness of the Shortest Vector Problem in l/sub 2/ norm; an old open problem. Our proofs use reductions from few-prover, one-round interactive proof systems, either directly, or through a set-cover problem.>

Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Dec 30, 2002•181 citations

Viewpoint: Tensor networks—a new tool for old problems

Subir Sachdev A

A new renormalization group approach that maps lattice problems to tensor networks may hold the key to solving seemingly intractable models of strongly correlated systems in any dimension.

•Oct 26, 2009•2 citations

Practical Product Proofs for Lattice Commitments

Thomas Attema, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Gregor Seiler

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2020•63 citations
We prove the following about the Nearest Lattice Vector Problem (in any l/sub p/ norm), the Nearest Code-word Problem for binary codes, the problem of learning a halfspace in the presence of errors, and some other problems. 1. Approximating the optimum within any constant factor is NP-hard. 2. If for some /spl epsiv/>0 there exists a polynomial time algorithm that approximates the optimum within a factor of 2/sup log(0.5-/spl epsiv/)/ /sup n/ then NP is in quasi-polynomial deterministic time: NP/spl sube/DTIME(n/sup poly(log/ /sup n)/). Moreover, we show that result 2 also holds for the Shortest Lattice Vector Problem in the l/sub /spl infin// norm. Improving the factor 2/sup log(0.5-/spl epsiv/)/ /sup n/ to /spl radic/(dim) for either of the lattice problems would imply the hardness of the Shortest Vector Problem in l/sub 2/ norm; an old open problem. Our proofs use reductions from few-prover, one-round interactive proof systems, either directly, or through a set-cover problem.>