Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Information

“Quantumness” versus “classicality” of quantum states and quantum protocols

Aharon Brodutch, Berry Groisman, Dan Kenigsberg, Tal Mor

Published Mar 1, 2018• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Entanglement is one of the pillars of quantum mechanics and quantum information processing, and as a result, the quantumness of nonentangled states has typically been overlooked and unrecognized until the last decade. We give a robust definition for the classicality versus quantumness of a single multipartite quantum state, a set of states, and a protocol using quantum states. We show a variety of nonentangled (separable) states that exhibit interesting quantum properties, and we explore the “zoo” of separable states; several interesting subclasses are defined based on the diagonalizing bases of the states, and their nonclassical behavior is investigated.

DOI
10.1142/s0219749918500144

Related papers

"Quantumness" versus "Classicality" of Quantum States

Berry Groisman, Dan Kenigsberg, Tal Mor

Entanglement is one of the pillars of quantum mechanics and quantum information processing, and as a result the quantumness of nonentangled states has typically been overlooked and unrecognized. We give a robust definition for the classicality versus quantumness of a single multipartite quantum state, a set of states, and a protocol using quantum states. We show a variety of nonentangled (separable) states that exhibit interesting quantum properties, and we explore the ``zoo'' of separable states; several interesting subclasses are defined based on their diagonalizing bases, and their non-classical behavior is investigated.

arXiv:quant-ph/0703103•Mar 13, 2007•13 citations

Classical states versus separable states

Nan Li, Shunlong Luo

A bipartite state is called classical (with regard to correlations) if it is left undisturbed by a certain local von Neumann measurement, and is called separable if it can be represented as a convex combination of product states. Due to the perfect distinguishability of orthogonal vectors, a classical state can essentially be identified with a convenient bivariate probability distribution, and moreover, it is separable, but not vice versa. The notion of separability plays a key role in quantum information theory because entanglement is defined via separability. However, the definition of separability is ad hoc and formal. In this paper, we present an intrinsic characterization of separable states via classical states from the measurement perspective: Separable states are precisely those states that are reductions of classical states in higher dimensions with the natural partitions. Consequently, entangled states are precisely those states that cannot be represented as such reductions of classical states. This observation highlights the hidden mutually exclusive and complementary relations between classicality and entanglement.

Physical Review A•Aug 14, 2008•83 citations

Nonclassicality witnesses and entanglement creation

Frank E. S. Steinhoff

Several definitions of classicality are considered, such as P-representability, generalized coherent states and separable states. These notions are treated under a simple and general definition based on convex sets, which enables the use of the Hahn-Banach theorem to separate classical states from nonclassical ones. Nonclassicality linear witnesses are constructed, based on the observables available in a given physical situation. Some examples of nonclassical states are considered, with detection schemes available nowadays. Reviewing the concept of entanglement potential from a different perspective, it is shown that in some contexts an arbitrary single-system nonclassical state can be converted into a bipartite entangled state, provided a generalized controlled-displacement (e.g., beam-splitter, CNOT gate) is available. Also, this entanglement can be detected in a simple way using the nonclassicality witness of the original single-system state. Finally, we extend the discussion to multipartite states, proposing alternative ways to generate and classify multipartite entanglement.

arXiv:1204.1794•Apr 9, 2012•0 citations

Reassessing the Boundary between Classical and Nonclassical for Individual Quantum Processes

Yujie Zhang, David Schmid, Yìlè Yīng +1 more

There is a received wisdom about where to draw the boundary between classical and nonclassical for various types of quantum processes. For multipartite states, it is the divide between separable and entangled; for channels, the divide between entanglement breaking and not; for sets of measurements, the divide between compatible and incompatible; for assemblages, the divide between unsteerable and steerable. However, these choices have not been motivated by any unified notion of what it means to be classically explainable. One well-motivated notion of classical explainability is the one based on generalized noncontextuality: A set of circuits is classically explainable if a generalized-noncontextual ontological model can realize the statistics they generate. In this work, we show that this notion can be leveraged to define a classical-nonclassical divide for individual quantum processes of arbitrary type. A set of measurements, for example, is judged to be classical if and only if a particular set of circuits—the one obtained by contracting these measurements with every possible quantum state—is classically explainable in the sense just articulated. We begin the task of characterizing where the classical-nonclassical divide lies according to this proposal for a variety of different types of processes. In particular, we show that all of the following are judged to be nonclassical: every entangled state, every set of incompatible measurements, every non-entanglement-breaking channel, and every steerable assemblage. Our proposal differs from the received wisdom, however, insofar as it also judges certain subsets of the complementary classes to be nonclassical, including certain separable states, compatible sets of measurements, entanglement-breaking channels, and unsteerable assemblages. Finally, we prove structure theorems characterizing the classical-nonclassical divide based on whether a process admits of a specific type of frame representation.

arXiv:2503.05884•Physical Review X•Apr 14, 2026•3 citations

QUANTUM ENTANGLED STATES

Zheng Y. Zhou

Entanglement is one of the intriguing characteristics of quantum mechanics. We review the history of quantum entangled states and the main advances in the measure of entanglement, the distinguishing of entangled states from separable states and the classification of entangled states.

•Jan 1, 2000•2 citations

Trading Causal Order for Locality

Ravi Kunjwal, Ämin Baumeler

Quantum theory admits ensembles of quantum nonlocality without entanglement (QNLWE). These ensembles consist of seemingly classical states (they are perfectly distinguishable and nonentangled) that cannot be perfectly discriminated with local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Here, we analyze QNLWE from a causal perspective, and show how to perfectly discriminate some of these ensembles using local operations and classical communication without definite causal order. Specifically, three parties with access to an instance of indefinite causal order-the Araújo-Feix-Baumeler-Wolf process-can perfectly discriminate the states in a QNLWE ensemble-the SHIFT ensemble-with local operations. Hence, this type of quantum nonlocality disappears at the expense of definite causal order while retaining classical communication. Our results thereby leverage the fact that LOCC is a conjunction of three constraints: local operations, classical communication, and definite causal order. Moreover, we show how multipartite generalizations of the Araújo-Feix-Baumeler-Wolf process are transformed into multiqubit ensembles that exhibit QNLWE. Such ensembles are of independent interest for cryptographic protocols and for the study of separable quantum operations unachievable with LOCC.

arXiv:2202.00440•Physical Review Letters•Sep 18, 2023•3 citations
Entanglement is one of the pillars of quantum mechanics and quantum information processing, and as a result, the quantumness of nonentangled states has typically been overlooked and unrecognized until the last decade. We give a robust definition for the classicality versus quantumness of a single multipartite quantum state, a set of states, and a protocol using quantum states. We show a variety of nonentangled (separable) states that exhibit interesting quantum properties, and we explore the “zoo” of separable states; several interesting subclasses are defined based on the diagonalizing bases of the states, and their nonclassical behavior is investigated.
Entanglement is one of the pillars of quantum mechanics and quantum information processing, and as a result the quantumness of nonentangled states has typically been overlooked and unrecognized. We give a robust definition for the classicality versus quantumness of a single multipartite quantum state, a set of states, and a protocol using quantum states. We show a variety of nonentangled (separable) states that exhibit interesting quantum properties, and we explore the ``zoo'' of separable states; several interesting subclasses are defined based on their diagonalizing bases, and their non-classical behavior is investigated.
A bipartite state is called classical (with regard to correlations) if it is left undisturbed by a certain local von Neumann measurement, and is called separable if it can be represented as a convex combination of product states. Due to the perfect distinguishability of orthogonal vectors, a classical state can essentially be identified with a convenient bivariate probability distribution, and moreover, it is separable, but not vice versa. The notion of separability plays a key role in quantum information theory because entanglement is defined via separability. However, the definition of separability is ad hoc and formal. In this paper, we present an intrinsic characterization of separable states via classical states from the measurement perspective: Separable states are precisely those states that are reductions of classical states in higher dimensions with the natural partitions. Consequently, entangled states are precisely those states that cannot be represented as such reductions of classical states. This observation highlights the hidden mutually exclusive and complementary relations between classicality and entanglement.
Several definitions of classicality are considered, such as P-representability, generalized coherent states and separable states. These notions are treated under a simple and general definition based on convex sets, which enables the use of the Hahn-Banach theorem to separate classical states from nonclassical ones. Nonclassicality linear witnesses are constructed, based on the observables available in a given physical situation. Some examples of nonclassical states are considered, with detection schemes available nowadays. Reviewing the concept of entanglement potential from a different perspective, it is shown that in some contexts an arbitrary single-system nonclassical state can be converted into a bipartite entangled state, provided a generalized controlled-displacement (e.g., beam-splitter, CNOT gate) is available. Also, this entanglement can be detected in a simple way using the nonclassicality witness of the original single-system state. Finally, we extend the discussion to multipartite states, proposing alternative ways to generate and classify multipartite entanglement.
There is a received wisdom about where to draw the boundary between classical and nonclassical for various types of quantum processes. For multipartite states, it is the divide between separable and entangled; for channels, the divide between entanglement breaking and not; for sets of measurements, the divide between compatible and incompatible; for assemblages, the divide between unsteerable and steerable. However, these choices have not been motivated by any unified notion of what it means to be classically explainable. One well-motivated notion of classical explainability is the one based on generalized noncontextuality: A set of circuits is classically explainable if a generalized-noncontextual ontological model can realize the statistics they generate. In this work, we show that this notion can be leveraged to define a classical-nonclassical divide for individual quantum processes of arbitrary type. A set of measurements, for example, is judged to be classical if and only if a particular set of circuits—the one obtained by contracting these measurements with every possible quantum state—is classically explainable in the sense just articulated. We begin the task of characterizing where the classical-nonclassical divide lies according to this proposal for a variety of different types of processes. In particular, we show that all of the following are judged to be nonclassical: every entangled state, every set of incompatible measurements, every non-entanglement-breaking channel, and every steerable assemblage. Our proposal differs from the received wisdom, however, insofar as it also judges certain subsets of the complementary classes to be nonclassical, including certain separable states, compatible sets of measurements, entanglement-breaking channels, and unsteerable assemblages. Finally, we prove structure theorems characterizing the classical-nonclassical divide based on whether a process admits of a specific type of frame representation.
Quantum theory admits ensembles of quantum nonlocality without entanglement (QNLWE). These ensembles consist of seemingly classical states (they are perfectly distinguishable and nonentangled) that cannot be perfectly discriminated with local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Here, we analyze QNLWE from a causal perspective, and show how to perfectly discriminate some of these ensembles using local operations and classical communication without definite causal order. Specifically, three parties with access to an instance of indefinite causal order-the Araújo-Feix-Baumeler-Wolf process-can perfectly discriminate the states in a QNLWE ensemble-the SHIFT ensemble-with local operations. Hence, this type of quantum nonlocality disappears at the expense of definite causal order while retaining classical communication. Our results thereby leverage the fact that LOCC is a conjunction of three constraints: local operations, classical communication, and definite causal order. Moreover, we show how multipartite generalizations of the Araújo-Feix-Baumeler-Wolf process are transformed into multiqubit ensembles that exhibit QNLWE. Such ensembles are of independent interest for cryptographic protocols and for the study of separable quantum operations unachievable with LOCC.