Abstract Chapter 6 introduces quantum-mechanical ensemble theory by proving the asymptotic equivalence of the quantum-mechanical, microcanonical ensemble average with the quantum grand canonical ensemble average for many-particle systems, based on the method of Darwin and Fowler. The procedures involved identify the grand partition function, entropy and other statistical thermodynamic variables, including the grand potential, Helmholtz free energy, thermodynamic potential, Gibbs free energy, Enthalpy and their relations in accordance with the fundamental laws of thermodynamics. Accompanying saddle-point integrations define temperature (inverse thermal energy) and chemical potential (Fermi energy). The concomitant emergence of quantum statistical mechanics and Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac distribution functions are discussed in detail (including Bose condensation). The magnetic moment is derived from the Helmholtz free energy and is expressed in terms of a one-particle retarded Green’s function with an imaginary time argument related to inverse thermal energy. This is employed in a discussion of diamagnetism and the de Haas-van Alphen effect.
Abstract Chapter 6 introduces quantum-mechanical ensemble theory by proving the asymptotic equivalence of the quantum-mechanical, microcanonical ensemble average with the quantum grand canonical ensemble average for many-particle systems, based on the method of Darwin and Fowler. The procedures involved identify the grand partition function, entropy and other statistical thermodynamic variables, including the grand potential, Helmholtz free energy, thermodynamic potential, Gibbs free energy, Enthalpy and their relations in accordance with the fundamental laws of thermodynamics. Accompanying saddle-point integrations define temperature (inverse thermal energy) and chemical potential (Fermi energy). The concomitant emergence of quantum statistical mechanics and Bose–Einstein and Fermi–Dirac distribution functions are discussed in detail (including Bose condensation). The magnetic moment is derived from the Helmholtz free energy and is expressed in terms of a one-particle retarded Green’s function with an imaginary time argument related to inverse thermal energy. This is employed in a discussion of diamagnetism and the de Haas-van Alphen effect.
Abstract Chapter 11 presents a statistical mechanical treatment of the quantum ideal gases, i.e., the ideal Boltzmann, fermion, and boson gases. The discussion begins with the microscopic description and the solution of the eigenvalue problem for a quantum ideal gas. It is argued that calculating the partition function is most readily accomplished in the grand canonical ensemble using a second-quantized formulation. When the particles are distinguishable, the equation of state is identical to that of a classical ideal gas. For fermions and bosons, however, the problem of computing thermodynamic properties is significantly more complex and can only be solved exactly in certain limits. Away from these limits approximations are needed and are discussed in detail. The relevant distributions - the Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein distributions are derived. The local density approximation of density functional theory is derived for the ideal electron gas. For the ideal boson gas, the phenomenon of Bose-Einstein condensation is discussed
Review of quantum statistical mechanicsThermodynamics is used to describe the bulk properties of matter in or near equilibrium.Many scientists, notably Boyle, Carnot, Clausius, Gay-Lussac, Gibbs, Joule, Kelvin, and Rumford, contributed to the development of the field over three centuries.Quantities such as mass, pressure, energy, and so on are readily defined and measured.Classical statistical mechanics attempts to understand thermodynamics by the application of classical mechanics to the microscopic particles making up the system.Great progress in this field was made by physicists like Boltzmann and Maxwell.Temperature, entropy, particle number, and chemical potential are thus understandable in terms of the microscopic nature of matter.Classical mechanics is inadequate in many circumstances however, and ultimately must be replaced by quantum mechanics.In fact, the ultraviolet catastrophe encountered by the application of classical mechanics and electromagnetism to blackbody radiation was one of the problems that led to the development of quantum theory.The development of quantum statistical mechanics was achieved by a number of twentieth century physicists, most notably Planck, Einstein, Fermi, and Bose.The purpose of this chapter is to give a mini-review of the basic concepts of quantum statistical mechanics as applied to noninteracting systems of particles.This will set the stage for the functional integral representation of the partition function, which is a cornerstone of modern relativistic quantum field theory and the quantum statistical mechanics of interacting particles and fields. EnsemblesOne normally encounters three types of ensemble in equilibrium statistical mechanics.The microcanonical ensemble is used to describe an isolated system that has a fixed energy E, a fixed particle number N , and a fixed 1
An energy level consists of all microscopic states of a system with the same energy. The energy levels of a system depend on the number of particles and the volume. At each instance in time, many different quantum states are represented in the various systems in the ensemble. A microcanonical ensemble describes an isolated system which has a fixed energy, volume and number of particles. The chapter describes certain relationships between fluctuations in thermodynamical variables and some other thermodynamical entities. One case of particular interest is when each subsystem is composed of one single particle, for instance very weakly interacting particles adsorbed on a surface or the particles in an ideal gas. The chapter presents more strict derivations of the probability expressions in the canonical, isobaric-isothermal and grand canonical ensembles. Volume and number of particles can also be considered as being mechanical variables. Entropy and temperature are examples of nonmechanical variables.
Abstract Quantum thermodynamics describes dynamic processes by means of the operators of entropy production P and time t . P and t do not commute. It exists the non-vanishing t–P commutator [ t , P ]=ik. Here the Boltzmann constant k has the physical meaning of a quantum of entropy. The t–P commutator immediately leads us to the t–P uncertainty relation ΔtΔP≥k/2. Hence the observables t and P are not sharply defined simultaneously. Similar uncertainty relations can also be expected for other pairs of conjugate variables with products of the physical meaning of an entropy. The free energy F and the reciprocal temperature (1/T) are the respective conjugate variables of an isolated system of many particles, which leads us to the F–(1/T) uncertainty relation ǀΔFǁΔ(1/T)ǀ≥k/2. It can be traced back to the t–P uncertainty relation mentioned above. In this way the Helmholtz free energy F and the temperatur T are introduced into quantum thermodynamics. The uncertainties ǀΔFǀ→0 and ǀΔTǀ→0 are negligible at low temperatures T→0, and quantum thermodynamics turns into the time-independent classical thermodynamics. Against this the uncertainties ǀΔFǀ→∞ and ǀΔTǀ→∞ grow unlimited at high temperatures T→∞, and classical thermodynamics loses its sense. In the limit of one particle the uncertainties cannot be neglected even at low temperatures. However a detailed discussion shows that the free energy f of a single particle vanishes within the whole range of temperatures T. This defines the particle entropy σ=ε/T=ak. The dimensionless entropy number a connects the particle energy ε=akT with the temperature T. The entropy number a of a single (s) independent particle can be calculated with the extended, temperature-dependent Schrödinger equation A s φ=aφ. Here A s=−(Λ 2/4π)∇2 means the dimensionless entropy operator describing the entropy number a and thus the particle entropy σ=ak. Λ is the thermal de Broglie wave length. Finally we calculate by means of quantized particle entropies σ the internal energy E, the Helmholtz free energy F, the entropy S, the chemical potential μ, and the equation of state of an ideal gas of N monatomic free particles in full agreement with classical thermodynamics. We also calculate the partition function q=V/Λ 3 of a single free particle within the volume V. Here Λ 3 is a small volume element taking into account the wave–particle dualism of a single free particle of mass m at temperature T. Extension to a system of N free particles leads us to a simple geometrical model and to the conclusion that an ideal gas of independent particles becomes instable below a critical temperature T C. T C corresponds to the critical temperature T BE of Bose–Einstein condensation.
This chapter develops the basic equations that will be used to analyse the Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein gases. The representation of many-particle states in terms of products of single-particle states is presented. The reasons for using the quantum grand canonical ensemble are given, and a general expression for the grand canonical partition function is derived. The essential equations for fermions, bosons, and distinguishable particles are developed, and the basic strategy for using them to solve problems is given.
Classical statistical mechanics/thermodynamics is sometimes portrayed as an approximate approach to describing the classical mechanical motion of very large numbers of particles. Equilibrium statistical mechanics/thermodynamics, however, is a special situation in which thermodynamic averages such as temperature, pressure etc do not change in time. We argue in this note that this is due to constraints imposed on such equilibrium scenarios namely time reversal reaction balance. It is this (approximate) constraint which yields the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution which in turn defines average values of classical values e.g. pressure resulting from an average of bvv (b=constant) and temperature being related to average kinetic energy. Interestingly, average values such as average energy and pressure may yield a classical mechanical relationship for adiabatic processes, otherwise the more complicated dE=TdS - PdV applies to these averages. (To be more accurate one may use the constraints of microcanonical theory.) Quantum mechanics is also a statistical theory because a single particle with a fixed momentum is characterized by a physical wavelength region and a probability distribution exp(ipx). If interactions occur with potential regions a superposition of these distributions (i.e. a momentum superposition) occurs i.e. W(x)= Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx). This represents one constraint in quantum mechanics), but there is a second, namely that averages for a bound system match classical values. Thus, like classical statistical mechanics one may imagine a system characterized by a parameter say L (box length) which changes such that the particle stays in the same quantum state (i.e. an adiabatic change). Given that bound quantum mechanics is constrained to behave on average as a classical system it is not surprising that a dE=PdV which is essentially a Newton’s second law statement dE=Fdx and is not necessarily linked to a usual statistical system. If a quantum state has its parameter changed nonadiabatically it should be able to have it change into a superposition of new quantum states (new L) which is very different from the classical statistical mechanical scenario. Furthermore the ideal gas relationship PV=NRT and E=3/2NRT (3 degrees of freedom) or PV=(⅔)E matches a classical mechanical result because a particle with p may bounce from a wall yielding an impulse. In this note we try to examine some of these underlying constraints and argue that even dE=PdV for average E and P values (i.e. no entropy change) one must be aware of the specific constraints involved. In other words because dE=PdV for both adiabatic classical statistical mechanical systems and a quantum eigenstate, these do not necessarily represent the same statistical type of physics. We further argue that quantum mechanical bound states are constrained to have some average and rms values such as KE(x) and p rms behave as classical values and so these should not be taken to represent “intrinsic” quantum behaviour while average spatial density on the other hand does. (It is linked to the constraint of wavelength.)