We restudy the particle double slit experiment and wave-particle duality of matter. We argue that: (1) a particle moving with acceleration has no wave-like behavior; thus (2) it is the acceleration of particle caused by the photons during an optical observation that collapses a matter wave; (3) This mechanism does not affect the history of the particle’s movement prior to the observation takes place. Modified double slit apparatus with various configurations covering different ways of accelerating particle is propose to investigate the wave-particle duality of accelerating matter and test the mechanism. Also we propose: (1) a free falling double slit experiment in a gravitational field. (2) An experiment in which, relative to an observer in Lab, the slit wall and detection screen are accelerated and the particle keeps constant speed. We raise a question that if, after the acceleration, the particle continuously flies with a constant speed before reaching the detection screen, would it regain wave-like behavior automatically? We also design an experiment to test this possibility.
We restudy the particle double slit experiment and wave-particle duality of matter. We argue that: (1) a particle moving with acceleration has no wave-like behavior; thus (2) it is the acceleration of particle caused by the photons during an optical observation that collapses a matter wave; (3) This mechanism does not affect the history of the particle’s movement prior to the observation takes place. Modified double slit apparatus with various configurations covering different ways of accelerating particle is propose to investigate the wave-particle duality of accelerating matter and test the mechanism. Also we propose: (1) a free falling double slit experiment in a gravitational field. (2) An experiment in which, relative to an observer in Lab, the slit wall and detection screen are accelerated and the particle keeps constant speed. We raise a question that if, after the acceleration, the particle continuously flies with a constant speed before reaching the detection screen, would it regain wave-like behavior automatically? We also design an experiment to test this possibility.
The double-slit experiment has long been pivotal in understanding matter’s wave–particle duality. A central question revolves around Born’s interpretation of wavefunction whether a single photon demonstrates a 50% probability of passing through each slit individually as particles or simultaneously traverses both as waves. Experimentally, once the photon’s path is detected, the observer effect causes its wavefunction to collapse, rendering the results inconclusive. Designing an experiment to minimize instrumental involvement during the wavefunction collapse of photons, while aiming to gain insight into its collapse mechanism, becomes necessary. We propose a revised experiment that replaces the traditional setup with two Au nanoparticles acting as observers, triggering photon collapse before spectrum collection. In single-photon scenarios, we consider two assumptions: first, the photon wavefunctions collapse into a particle and transfer energy to one of the nanoparticles exclusively, and second, the photon acts as a wave, splitting and transferring its energy to two nanoparticles simultaneously, which does not align well with Born’s interpretation of wavefunction as spatial probabilities. These two assumptions would generate distinctly different spectra. Conversely, in high-intensity experiments, both nanoparticles collectively undergo excitation, regardless of the collapse mechanism. A comparative analysis of scattering spectra under the two conditions reveals crucial insights into the genuine nature of photon collapse. We also proposed using two molecules attached to a metal nanoparticle as an alternative design. Whether affirming or refuting the observer effect, this research holds promise for resolving the theoretical debate surrounding the collapse of wavefunctions and advancing quantum computing and communication fields.
Abstract: Many problems exist in the Double Slit Experiment when you consider that the elements in the test are moving as waves. Outside of the pattern resembling peeks and troughs that overlap each other; there is no real scientific explanation on how this is taking place. In a more accurate and classical way, can we explain how the dark and light areas of the interference pattern are being made? Why is an Interference pattern being made when particles are being sent through the exercise one at a time? And how is it that through observation the Interference pattern collapses in on itself. Waves add more questions than they do answers, a very typical outcome of an incorrect solution. Maybe the unanswered questions left behind by the wave theory is a confirmation of its inaccuracy and not the mystique of its results. Rather than double down on the wave theory with time traveling particles, elements of duality, and the Copenhagen Interpretation; l reconsidered that elements tested in the double slit experiment behave as particles. But this time, I weighed the thought that these bits of matter are much smaller than previously thought. This new logic allowed particles with straight trajectories to interact with the edge of materials used in the double slit wall in a very detailed way. This created a storm of new ways to look at what is really taking place in the test; revealing the competence of the detectors utilized and the capacity of the Nonlinear Optical Crystal. Everything solved from just one idea, that quantum move as particles but on a much smaller scale. This is the enigma of the Double Slit Experiment.
The double-slit experiment demonstrates the wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics. One of the many astonishing results is that which slit a test particle passes through cannot be known while at the same time interference pattern is kept. The reason behind this phenomenon is due to the impact of an observer on the particle in the experiment. The inverse relationship between the wavelength (sensibility) and frequency (impact) makes it impossible to detect which slit a particle passes through and not to affect the particle's trajectory. We wish to propose an idea of using an energyless observer that has zero impact on the particle. The observer is energyless and consists of mass and negative mass in certain configurations. It falls in a gravitational field as a normal object, but it does not affect other objects with masses. We utilize these properties to detect whether the paths of some observers are disrupted by the presence of the particle. Since the observers do not affect the motion of the particle during the experiment, the interference pattern is kept intact. At the same time, the patterns of paths of the fell through observers can be analyzed to determine which slit the particle passed through.
We report observations of Cross-Double-Slit Experiment and Which-Path-Cross-Double-Slit experiment. Cross-Double-Slit apparatus contains two double-slit, where first double-slit is perpendicular to second double-slit. The first double-slit and the second double-slit generate not only their own interference pattern perpendicular to each other, but also generate “Cross-interference-patterns”. When we do which-way experiment with one of two double-slit, say first double-slit, then its interference pattern disappeared, i.e., photons behave as particles; but the second double-slit’s interference pattern and the cross-interference-pattern still exist; which implies an significant phenomenon that in the same experiment, photons behave as both wave and particle, which is first time caught on film. Thus we suggest to re-study wave-particle duality, which is the basic mystery of quantum mechanics. We postulate that the particle nature of photons is intrinsic; while the wave-like of photons is manifest-behavior.
Young's double slit experiments representing the mystery of quantum mechanics have been descripted by wave theories. To study the mystery, the double slit experiments were extended to the cross-double slit experiments. A description should explain all the double slit and cross-double slit experiments consistently. To test the wave description, the two postulates are proposed, which state that before passing through the double slit and before landing on the detector, photons behave as particles, but not as waves. To test the two postulates, the comprehensive double slit/cross-double slit experiments are proposed and performed. By placing shields and/or blockers near the detector/screen, the comprehensive double slit/cross-double slit experiments show that the fringes are created independently and partially, which discloses the particle nature of photons in the double slit/crossdouble slit experiments and violates the wave descriptions. The comprehensive double slit/cross-double slit experiments provide the comprehensive phenomena for developing theoretical model to study the mystery of double slit, complementarity principle, wave-particle duality, and wave theory of light.
The double-slit experiment is usually taken as evidence that a particle is also a wave. We show by simulation that a definite particle, moving through a physical medium and guided by its own wave, produces the same interference pattern, with no constant fitted to the pattern. Space is modeled as a compressible particle medium with a short-range stiffness. A particle set in motion disturbs it once. The disturbance disperses, and the particle carries with it the part of the wave whose group velocity matches its own speed, so the wavelength at the particle is fixed by its speed alone, λ ∝ 1/v, with no oscillator and no continued pushing. That wave passes through two slits and interferes as any wave does. The particle passes through one slit, keeps its speed, and takes its direction from the flow of the wave around it. It lands where the wave is bright. Hundreds of particles, sent one at a time, reproduce the wave's own pattern: at three speeds and two slit spacings, up to nine bright lanes with empty dark bands between them, lane spacing that scales with the wavelength of the wave it carries, the same pattern for a stream of particles as for one, and no lanes when one slit is closed. The rule that steers the particle has no strength, no frequency, and no free constant, and it is the same rule at every scale because each particle's wave is sized to itself. The result depends on one condition: that the particle's launch point lie well beyond the near-field distance of the slit pair, which laboratory sources satisfy. We record the rules that were tried and failed and the numerical pitfalls, and we state what remains open: the silent coast is a postulate, the mass dependence of the wavelength is untested, and the work is two-dimensional.