Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, further generalized as Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA), is a family of algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. It is a leading candidate to run on emerging universal quantum computers to gain insight into quantum heuristics. In constrained optimization, penalties are often introduced so that the ground state of the cost Hamiltonian encodes the solution (a standard practice in quantum annealing). An alternative is to choose a mixing Hamiltonian such that the constraint corresponds to a constant of motion and the quantum evolution stays in the feasible subspace. Better performance of the algorithm is speculated due to a much smaller search space. We consider problems with a constant Hamming weight as the constraint. We also compare different methods of generating the generalized W-state, which serves as a natural initial state for the Hamming-weight constraint. Using graph-coloring as an example, we compare the performance of using XY model as a mixer that preserves the Hamming weight with the performance of adding a penalty term in the cost Hamiltonian.
Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, further generalized as Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA), is a family of algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. It is a leading candidate to run on emerging universal quantum computers to gain insight into quantum heuristics. In constrained optimization, penalties are often introduced so that the ground state of the cost Hamiltonian encodes the solution (a standard practice in quantum annealing). An alternative is to choose a mixing Hamiltonian such that the constraint corresponds to a constant of motion and the quantum evolution stays in the feasible subspace. Better performance of the algorithm is speculated due to a much smaller search space. We consider problems with a constant Hamming weight as the constraint. We also compare different methods of generating the generalized W-state, which serves as a natural initial state for the Hamming-weight constraint. Using graph-coloring as an example, we compare the performance of using XY model as a mixer that preserves the Hamming weight with the performance of adding a penalty term in the cost Hamiltonian.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm/quantum alternating operator ansatz (QAOA) is a heuristic to find approximate solutions of combinatorial optimization problems. Most of the literature is limited to quadratic problems without constraints. However, many practically relevant optimization problems do have (hard) constraints that need to be fulfilled. In this article, we present a framework for constructing mixing operators that restrict the evolution to a subspace of the full Hilbert space given by these constraints. We generalize the “XY”-mixer designed to preserve the subspace of “one-hot” states to the general case of subspaces given by a number of computational basis states. We expose the underlying mathematical structure which reveals more of how mixers work and how one can minimize their cost in terms of the number of CX gates, particularly when Trotterization is taken into account. Our analysis also leads to valid Trotterizations for an “XY”-mixer with fewer CX gates than is known to date. In view of practical implementations, we also describe algorithms for efficient decomposition into basis gates. Several examples of more general cases are presented and analyzed.
The quantum alternating operator ansatz (QAOA) is a promising gate-model metaheuristic for combinatorial optimization. Applying the algorithm to problems with constraints presents an implementation challenge for near-term quantum resources. This paper explores strategies for enforcing hard constraints by using XY Hamiltonians as mixing operators (mixers). Despite the complexity of simulating the XY model, we demonstrate that, for an integer variable admitting $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ discrete values represented through one-hot encoding, certain classes of the mixer Hamiltonian can be implemented without Trotter error in depth $O(\ensuremath{\kappa})$. We also specify general strategies for implementing QAOA circuits on all-to-all connected hardware graphs and linearly connected hardware graphs inspired by fermionic simulation techniques. Performance is validated on graph-coloring problems that are known to be challenging for a given classical algorithm. The general strategy of using XY mixers is borne out numerically, demonstrating a significant improvement over the general X mixer, and moreover the generalized W state yields better performance than easier-to-generate classical initial states when XY mixers are used.
XY mixer are a type of mixing Hamiltonians used in the quantum alternating operator ansatzs (QAOA) framework for solving combinatorial optimization problems where the feasible subspace consists of states with the same Hamming weight. In this paper, we propose an extension of the XY-mixer ansatzes to solve optimization problems that do not adhere to this specific subspace structure. For problems, such as maximal independent set, one can employ positive semidefinite programming and a greedy algorithm to obtain upper and lower bounds for the optimal solution, then utilize the XY-mixer ansatzes in the separated subspaces between the upper and lower bounds to address the problem at hand. Additionally, we find suitable counterdiabatic (CD) driving terms that complement the XY-mixer ansatzes. These driving terms accelerate the QAOA evolution towards the target state and also confine the evolution within the subspace. By combining XY-mixer ansatzes with counterdiabatic driving (XY-CD mixers), we present a generalized QAOA-based scheme for finding higher-quality approximate solutions to combinatorial problems.
Recently, Hadfield et al. proposed the quantum alternating operator ansatz algorithm (QAOA+), an extension of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), to solve constrained combinatorial optimization problems (CCOPs). Compared with QAOA, QAOA+ enables the search for optimal solutions within a feasible solution space by encoding problem constraints into the mixer Hamiltonian, thereby reducing the search space and eliminating the possibility of yielding infeasible solutions. However, QAOA+ may incur high overall gate costs when the mixer is applied to all qubits in each layer, and each mixer is costly to implement. To address this challenge, an adaptive mixer allocation strategy is tailored for QAOA+. The resulting algorithm, which integrates this strategy into the original QAOA+ framework, is referred to as AMA-QAOA+. Unlike QAOA+, AMA-QAOA+ adaptively applies the mixer to a subset of qubits in each layer of the mixer unitary operator based on an evaluation function. The performance of AMA-QAOA+ is evaluated on the maximum independent set problem. Numerical simulation results show that, under the same number of optimization runs, AMA-QAOA+ achieves better solution quality than QAOA+, with the optimal approximation ratio improved by 5.30% on ER random graphs and 5.41% on 3-regular graphs. Moreover, AMA-QAOA+ significantly reduces the CNOT gate consumption, requiring only 15.30% and 25.18% of the CNOT gates used by QAOA+ on ER and 3-regular random graphs, respectively. These results demonstrate that AMA-QAOA+ enhances solution quality and computational efficiency, enabling the design of more compact and resource-efficient quantum circuits.
ABSTRACT Recently, Hadfield et al. proposed the quantum alternating operator ansatz algorithm (QAOA+), an extension of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), to solve constrained combinatorial optimization problems (CCOPs). Compared with QAOA, QAOA+ enables the search for optimal solutions within a feasible solution space by encoding problem constraints into the mixer Hamiltonian, thereby reducing the search space and eliminating the possibility of yielding infeasible solutions. However, QAOA+ may incur high overall gate costs when the mixer is applied to all qubits in each layer, and each mixer is costly to implement. To address this challenge, an adaptive mixer allocation strategy is tailored for QAOA+. The resulting algorithm, which integrates this strategy into the original QAOA+ framework, is referred to as AMA‐QAOA+. Unlike QAOA+, AMA‐QAOA+ adaptively applies the mixer to a subset of qubits in each layer of the mixer unitary operator based on an evaluation function. The performance of AMA‐QAOA+ is evaluated on the maximum independent set problem. Numerical simulation results show that, under the same number of optimization runs, AMA‐QAOA+ achieves better solution quality than QAOA+, with the optimal approximation ratio improved by on Erdős–Rényi random graphs and on 3‐regular graphs. Moreover, AMA‐QAOA+ significantly reduces the CNOT gate consumption, requiring only and of the CNOT gates used by QAOA+ on Erdős–Rényi and 3‐regular random graphs, respectively. These results demonstrate that AMA‐QAOA+ enhances solution quality and computational efficiency, enabling the design of more compact and resource‐efficient quantum circuits.
We compare two different implementations of Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) for constrained optimization: the penalty function and the XY-mixer. The penalty function method converts a constrained problem to an unconstrained problem by penalizing constraint violations, whereas the XY-mixer uses two-qubit operators to maintain feasibility. We use a special case of the maximum diversity problem (MDP) to demonstrate the effectiveness of the XY-mixer. The MDP aims at selecting a subset of elements from a larger set to maximize diversity between the selected elements. The special case deals with instances in which elements are arranged in a circular structure. The circular MDP instances are challenging to solve using classical methods due to solution space symmetry but are well-suited for the topology of IBM quantum devices. We introduce a grouping and an approximation mechanism facilitating XY-mixer implementation on IBM quantum computers. Experiments with different-sized instances show that the XY-mixer generates more and better feasible solutions than the penalty function approach and increases the probability of finding good solutions.