Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Spring (PIERS-Spring)

Quantum state model of non-radiative decay for description of superradiance

Игорь Евгеньевич Проценко, Alexander V. Uskov

Published May 1, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Description of superradiance (SR) of few quantum emitters with non-radiative decay is carried out in the frame of Schrödinger picture taking into account non-equilibrium bath states. Quantum efficiencies (QE) of SR of two and three emitters are calculated and compared with QE of spontaneous emission of two and three independent emitters. Maximum increase of QE is 9% for two emitters and 16% for three emitters, it is reached at certain relationships between non-radiative and radiative decay rates and at non-equilibrium in baths of non-radiative decay.

DOI
10.1109/piers.2017.8262242

Related papers

Superradiance from few emitters with non-radiative decay

Игорь Евгеньевич Проценко, Alexander V. Uskov

Description of superradiance of few quantum emitters with non-radiative decay in terms of quantum states is presented. Quantum efficiencies (QE) of SR of two and three emitters are calculated and compared with the case of two and three independent emitters. Maximum increase in QE is 8% for two emitters and 16% for three emitters, it is reached at certain ratios between non-radiative and radiative rates. Approach can be generalized with inclusion of the incoherent pump, dephasing and delay in emitter-emitter interaction.

arXiv:1604.08302•Apr 28, 2016•1 citation

Superradiance Revisited

Joseph H. Eberly

The basic features of coherent spontaneous emission, including its dependence on the square of the number of participating emitters, are reviewed. Analogies with magnetic resonance phenomena are exploited, and we explain the need to go beyond such analogies in order to treat optical emission. Some recent results in the theory of optical superradiance are discussed. The radiative decay process is treated as a quantum-classical interpolation problem, and explicit solutions are given. In addition to its time dependence, we give the angular distribution of radiated power and the expected intensity fluctuations, and we estimate the maximum number of emitters which can cooperate in a superradiant event. Dicke's “coherence brightening” criterion is discussed from the point of view of the present paper. A “failure” of the criterion is exhibited and explained. Two of the purely quantum aspects of superradiance are isolated and discussed briefly.

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1972•47 citations

Superradiant Peak Emission Rate and Time in Quantum Emitter Arrays

Raphael Holzinger, Susanne F. Yelin

Determining the peak photon emission time and rate for an ensemble of $N$ quantum systems undergoing collective superradiant decay typically requires tracking the time evolution of the density operator. Generally, the dimension of the density operator grows exponentially ($\sim \! 2^N$) with the number of emitters, in the absence of any symmetries such as in Dicke superradiance with full or partial permutational symmetry. We present a detailed study of the superradiant peak emission rate and time for initially fully excited quantum emitter ensembles, for one-, two- and three-dimensional arrays in free-space and emitter chains coupled to waveguide reservoirs. For few emitters ($N\lesssim 14$) we utilize the full quantum master equation, and for mesoscopic emitter numbers ($N\lesssim 400$) we use a second- and third-order cumulant expansion of the operator averages to track the time evolution of the system.

arXiv:2504.09985•Apr 14, 2025•0 citations

From Superradiance to Superabsorption: An Exact Treatment of Non-Markovian Cooperative Radiation

Ignacio González, Ángel Rivas

We investigate the emergence of cooperative radiation phenomena in ensembles of two-level atoms coupled to a lossy resonant cavity beyond the Markovian and mean-field approximations. By deriving a complete analytical solution for the two-emitter case and employing a numerically exact method for larger ensembles, we characterize the full transition from Markovian to non-Markovian collective dynamics for systems of up to $10^3$ emitters. Our results reveal three distinct regimes: a Markovian phase exhibiting the standard superradiant burst, a non-Markovian phase featuring spontaneous superabsorption of the emitted field, and a critical regime marked by pulsed collective emission. We show that the critical spectral width separating these behaviors increases monotonically with the number of emitters, demonstrating that environmental memory effects can be enhanced by cooperativity. Finally, we find that the superradiant scaling of the peak intensity progressively degrades with increasing system size, approaching a subquadratic law in the limit of a perfect cavity. In this regime, spontaneous superabsorption emerges as a distinct manifestation of non-Markovian cooperativity.

quant-pharXiv:2601.05989•Quantum•Jan 12, 2026•0 citations

Superradiance

Nicholas E. Rehler, Joseph H. Eberly

We introduce a straightforward quantum-electrodynamic approach to the problem of superradiant spontaneous emission from a system of two-level atoms, and also discuss two classical superradiant systems. The same physical concepts underlie our treatment of both the quantum and classical cases. Explicit expressions are found which describe the time evolution and directional character of the radiated power. Our approach applies to an arbitrary number of atoms which are confined to a region with linear dimensions which may be large compared with the mean wavelength of the emitted radiation. The radiative decay half-life of a large many-atom system is found to be much shorter than the natural lifetime of a single atom, but not as short as the half-life of a small atomic system with the same number of atoms. The far-field radiation pattern appropriate to the case of a circular cylinder of emitters which have been excited by a plane-wave pulse is considered in detail. Polar plots are presented of the radiation patterns produced when the atoms are excited by a plane-wave pulse. Exciting pulses traveling in directions both parallel and at an angle of 10\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} to the axis of the cylinder are considered. A discussion and generalization of Dicke's "coherence-brightening" criterion is given.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1971•534 citations

Radiative Transitions between Discrete Quantum States

Greg J. Tallents

Radiation can change the energy state of matter via three optical processes: spontaneous emission, absorption and stimulated emission. In spontaneous emission, an excited atomic or molecular state decays to a lower energy state with the emission of a photon of energy equal to the difference in the quantum state energies. Photon absorption is the reverse process, with a photon causing excitation from a lower to an excited quantum state. Stimulated emission was first proposed by Einstein in a paper published in 1917. He attempted to balance spontaneous emission and photon absorption, but could not get the correct balance without the postulated process of stimulated emission (see Section 4.2). With stimulated emission, an excited quantum state is stimulated to decay to a lower quantum state by an impinging photon. The existing photon survives with another identical photon being created (so that energy is conserved). The rates at which radiative transitions occur can be calculated using quantum mechanics. The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is used with the system wavefunction comprising time-varying linear combinations of the two wavefunctions for the lower and upper quantum states. In semi-classical treatments, an atom is treated quantum mechanically with the radiation field treated classically. There is a perturbation in energy associated with, say, the electric field of the radiation interacting with the electric dipole of the atom, though other interactions can be significant if the electric dipole interaction energy is small. In absorption, for example, a differential equation representing the change in ‘weighting’ of the wavefunction from the lower to upper state is obtained. A ‘time constant’ for the speed of change represents the rate of the radiative process. We examine the quantum mechanical nature of radiation absorption in Section 10.1 before discussing (Section 10.3) another important parameter arising with radiative transitions between discrete bound quantum states: the lineshape function. Quantum Theory of the Atom–Radiation Interaction An expression for the Einstein B-coefficient for photo-absorption is derived using quantum mechanics in this section. Einstein determined the detailed balance relationship between the rates of spontaneous emission, photo-absorption and stimulated emission when light interacts with an atom by considering an atomic system of two energy levels which are in equilibrium with a black-body radiation field. We use a semi-classical treatment where the atom is treated quantum mechanically and the radiation field is treated as a classical oscillating electric field.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 20, 2018•0 citations
Description of superradiance (SR) of few quantum emitters with non-radiative decay is carried out in the frame of Schrödinger picture taking into account non-equilibrium bath states. Quantum efficiencies (QE) of SR of two and three emitters are calculated and compared with QE of spontaneous emission of two and three independent emitters. Maximum increase of QE is 9% for two emitters and 16% for three emitters, it is reached at certain relationships between non-radiative and radiative decay rates and at non-equilibrium in baths of non-radiative decay.
Description of superradiance of few quantum emitters with non-radiative decay in terms of quantum states is presented. Quantum efficiencies (QE) of SR of two and three emitters are calculated and compared with the case of two and three independent emitters. Maximum increase in QE is 8% for two emitters and 16% for three emitters, it is reached at certain ratios between non-radiative and radiative rates. Approach can be generalized with inclusion of the incoherent pump, dephasing and delay in emitter-emitter interaction.
The basic features of coherent spontaneous emission, including its dependence on the square of the number of participating emitters, are reviewed. Analogies with magnetic resonance phenomena are exploited, and we explain the need to go beyond such analogies in order to treat optical emission. Some recent results in the theory of optical superradiance are discussed. The radiative decay process is treated as a quantum-classical interpolation problem, and explicit solutions are given. In addition to its time dependence, we give the angular distribution of radiated power and the expected intensity fluctuations, and we estimate the maximum number of emitters which can cooperate in a superradiant event. Dicke's “coherence brightening” criterion is discussed from the point of view of the present paper. A “failure” of the criterion is exhibited and explained. Two of the purely quantum aspects of superradiance are isolated and discussed briefly.
Determining the peak photon emission time and rate for an ensemble of NNN quantum systems undergoing collective superradiant decay typically requires tracking the time evolution of the density operator. Generally, the dimension of the density operator grows exponentially (∼ ⁣2N\sim \! 2^N∼2N) with the number of emitters, in the absence of any symmetries such as in Dicke superradiance with full or partial permutational symmetry. We present a detailed study of the superradiant peak emission rate and time for initially fully excited quantum emitter ensembles, for one-, two- and three-dimensional arrays in free-space and emitter chains coupled to waveguide reservoirs. For few emitters (N≲14N\lesssim 14N≲14) we utilize the full quantum master equation, and for mesoscopic emitter numbers (N≲400N\lesssim 400N≲400) we use a second- and third-order cumulant expansion of the operator averages to track the time evolution of the system.
We investigate the emergence of cooperative radiation phenomena in ensembles of two-level atoms coupled to a lossy resonant cavity beyond the Markovian and mean-field approximations. By deriving a complete analytical solution for the two-emitter case and employing a numerically exact method for larger ensembles, we characterize the full transition from Markovian to non-Markovian collective dynamics for systems of up to 10310^3103 emitters. Our results reveal three distinct regimes: a Markovian phase exhibiting the standard superradiant burst, a non-Markovian phase featuring spontaneous superabsorption of the emitted field, and a critical regime marked by pulsed collective emission. We show that the critical spectral width separating these behaviors increases monotonically with the number of emitters, demonstrating that environmental memory effects can be enhanced by cooperativity. Finally, we find that the superradiant scaling of the peak intensity progressively degrades with increasing system size, approaching a subquadratic law in the limit of a perfect cavity. In this regime, spontaneous superabsorption emerges as a distinct manifestation of non-Markovian cooperativity.
We introduce a straightforward quantum-electrodynamic approach to the problem of superradiant spontaneous emission from a system of two-level atoms, and also discuss two classical superradiant systems. The same physical concepts underlie our treatment of both the quantum and classical cases. Explicit expressions are found which describe the time evolution and directional character of the radiated power. Our approach applies to an arbitrary number of atoms which are confined to a region with linear dimensions which may be large compared with the mean wavelength of the emitted radiation. The radiative decay half-life of a large many-atom system is found to be much shorter than the natural lifetime of a single atom, but not as short as the half-life of a small atomic system with the same number of atoms. The far-field radiation pattern appropriate to the case of a circular cylinder of emitters which have been excited by a plane-wave pulse is considered in detail. Polar plots are presented of the radiation patterns produced when the atoms are excited by a plane-wave pulse. Exciting pulses traveling in directions both parallel and at an angle of 10\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} to the axis of the cylinder are considered. A discussion and generalization of Dicke's "coherence-brightening" criterion is given.
Radiation can change the energy state of matter via three optical processes: spontaneous emission, absorption and stimulated emission. In spontaneous emission, an excited atomic or molecular state decays to a lower energy state with the emission of a photon of energy equal to the difference in the quantum state energies. Photon absorption is the reverse process, with a photon causing excitation from a lower to an excited quantum state. Stimulated emission was first proposed by Einstein in a paper published in 1917. He attempted to balance spontaneous emission and photon absorption, but could not get the correct balance without the postulated process of stimulated emission (see Section 4.2). With stimulated emission, an excited quantum state is stimulated to decay to a lower quantum state by an impinging photon. The existing photon survives with another identical photon being created (so that energy is conserved). The rates at which radiative transitions occur can be calculated using quantum mechanics. The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is used with the system wavefunction comprising time-varying linear combinations of the two wavefunctions for the lower and upper quantum states. In semi-classical treatments, an atom is treated quantum mechanically with the radiation field treated classically. There is a perturbation in energy associated with, say, the electric field of the radiation interacting with the electric dipole of the atom, though other interactions can be significant if the electric dipole interaction energy is small. In absorption, for example, a differential equation representing the change in ‘weighting’ of the wavefunction from the lower to upper state is obtained. A ‘time constant’ for the speed of change represents the rate of the radiative process. We examine the quantum mechanical nature of radiation absorption in Section 10.1 before discussing (Section 10.3) another important parameter arising with radiative transitions between discrete bound quantum states: the lineshape function. Quantum Theory of the Atom–Radiation Interaction An expression for the Einstein B-coefficient for photo-absorption is derived using quantum mechanics in this section. Einstein determined the detailed balance relationship between the rates of spontaneous emission, photo-absorption and stimulated emission when light interacts with an atom by considering an atomic system of two energy levels which are in equilibrium with a black-body radiation field. We use a semi-classical treatment where the atom is treated quantum mechanically and the radiation field is treated as a classical oscillating electric field.