Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

COMMENT ON A LETTER RELATED TO BELL'S THEOREM

Henry Pierce Stapp

Published Apr 1, 1982• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Comments on the Significance of Bell's Theorem

Arthur I. Fine

Physical Review Letters•Nov 15, 1982•8 citations

Comment: Bell's Theorem, a Glitch in Reality?

Markoulakis, Emmanouil

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Comment on “A Loophole of All “Loophole-Free” Bell-Type Theorems”

Justo Pastor Lambare

arXiv:2008.00369•Foundations of Science•Aug 14, 2020•11 citations

Comment on “Exclusion of time in the theorem of Bell” by K. Hess and W. Philipp

Richard David Gill, Gregor Weihs, Anton Zeilinger +1 more

A recent Letter by Hess and Philipp claims that Bell's theorem neglects the possibility of time-like dependence in local hidden variables, hence is not conclusive. Moreover the authors claim that they have constructed, in an earlier paper, a local realistic model of the EPR correlations. However, they themselves have neglected the experimenter's freedom to choose settings, while on the other hand, Bell's theorem can be formulated to cope with time-like dependence. This in itself proves that their toy model cannot satisfy local realism, but we also indicate where their proof of its local realistic nature fails.

arXiv:quant-ph/0204169•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Jan 1, 2003•19 citations

COMMENTS ON A PREVIOUS PAPER ABOUT BELL'S THEOREM

Philippe H. Eberhard

Physical Review Letters•Mar 1, 1982•0 citations

Update for "The collapse of Bell determinism"

James D. Malley

We update our paper: The collapse of Bell determinism (Physics Letters A, 359 (2006): 122-125; available online 16 June 2006). First, we point out that Olivier Brunet, using lattice theoretic methods, has recently, and quite independently, derived the core technical lemma of our paper; see: A priori knowledge and the Kochen-Specker theorem (Physics Letters A, available online 5 January 2007). He has also kindly pointed out a misstep in the last line of one of our results. We discuss the correction and comment on slightly revised notions of how Bell determinism collapses. We also correct a few typos in the original paper.

arXiv:quant-ph/0703180•Mar 19, 2007•0 citations
A recent Letter by Hess and Philipp claims that Bell's theorem neglects the possibility of time-like dependence in local hidden variables, hence is not conclusive. Moreover the authors claim that they have constructed, in an earlier paper, a local realistic model of the EPR correlations. However, they themselves have neglected the experimenter's freedom to choose settings, while on the other hand, Bell's theorem can be formulated to cope with time-like dependence. This in itself proves that their toy model cannot satisfy local realism, but we also indicate where their proof of its local realistic nature fails.
We update our paper: The collapse of Bell determinism (Physics Letters A, 359 (2006): 122-125; available online 16 June 2006). First, we point out that Olivier Brunet, using lattice theoretic methods, has recently, and quite independently, derived the core technical lemma of our paper; see: A priori knowledge and the Kochen-Specker theorem (Physics Letters A, available online 5 January 2007). He has also kindly pointed out a misstep in the last line of one of our results. We discuss the correction and comment on slightly revised notions of how Bell determinism collapses. We also correct a few typos in the original paper.