You might think that the great success of quantum electrodynamics (QED) would settle the debate on the nature of light to provide a clear view of its behavior, where the photon is regarded as the unit of excitation associated with a quantized mode of the electromagnetic (radiation) eld. However, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle tells us that a state of denite momentum, energy, and polarization associated with a plane wave used as a basis function of quantization must be completely indenite in space and time. It suggests the diµculty of spatial localization of a photon as a particle. In fact, Newton and Wigner showed that a free photon, as a massless particle with spin 1, has no localized states on the basis of natural invariance requirements that localized states for which operators of the Lorentz group apply should be orthogonal to the undisplaced localized states, a§er a translation (Newton and Wigner 1949). According to them, one can obtain a general expression for a position operator for massive particles and for massless particles of spin 0 or 1/2, not for massless particles with nite spin, which indicates that there is no probability density for the position of the photon, and thus a position-representation wave function cannot be consistently introduced. It has also been shown that photons are not localizable, on the basis of imprimitive representations of the Euclidean group (Wightman 1962). It is now believed that photons are only weakly localizable, although single-photon states with arbitrarily fast asymptotic fallo of energy density exist, and that a lack of strict localizability is directly related to the absence of a position operator for a photon in free space and a positionrepresentation photon wave function (Hawton 1999).
You might think that the great success of quantum electrodynamics (QED) would settle the debate on the nature of light to provide a clear view of its behavior, where the photon is regarded as the unit of excitation associated with a quantized mode of the electromagnetic (radiation) eld. However, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle tells us that a state of denite momentum, energy, and polarization associated with a plane wave used as a basis function of quantization must be completely indenite in space and time. It suggests the diµculty of spatial localization of a photon as a particle. In fact, Newton and Wigner showed that a free photon, as a massless particle with spin 1, has no localized states on the basis of natural invariance requirements that localized states for which operators of the Lorentz group apply should be orthogonal to the undisplaced localized states, a§er a translation (Newton and Wigner 1949). According to them, one can obtain a general expression for a position operator for massive particles and for massless particles of spin 0 or 1/2, not for massless particles with nite spin, which indicates that there is no probability density for the position of the photon, and thus a position-representation wave function cannot be consistently introduced. It has also been shown that photons are not localizable, on the basis of imprimitive representations of the Euclidean group (Wightman 1962). It is now believed that photons are only weakly localizable, although single-photon states with arbitrarily fast asymptotic fallo of energy density exist, and that a lack of strict localizability is directly related to the absence of a position operator for a photon in free space and a positionrepresentation photon wave function (Hawton 1999).
Whilst quantum electrodynamics (QED) underwent an impressive development and reached its maturity in the middle of the last century, one of its basic concepts—the photon wave function in free space—was deprived of such fortune. Although the photon wave function in coordinate representation was introduced already in 1930 by Landau and Peierls, the concept was found to suffer from inherent difficulties that were not overcome during the century —see review (Bialynicki-Birula, 1996). The common explanation presented in textbooks, e.g., (Akhiezer & Berestetskii, 1965; Mandel & Wolf, 1995), may be summed up as follows: (i) no position operator exists for the photon, (ii) while the position wave function may be localized near a space-time point, the measurable quantities like the electromagnetic field vectors, energy, and the photodetection probability remain spread out due to their non-local relation with the position wave function.
Abstract Through the classic work of Planck, Einstein, and others the particle nature of the photon has been established. In the previous chapter we considered the wave field of the photon. In this chapter we will emphasize more its particle nature and discuss the extent to which a wave function with a probabilistic interpretation is an appropriate description. Once we have the concept of a particle it is natural to ask how localized the state can be. The degree of localizability of photons is of concern in the interpretation of experiments in quantum optics involving weak light sources and non-linear electromagnetic media. If a photon is not to have the structure of a composite particle its quantum states should be describable by translations, rotations, and Lorentz boosts of a particular state and possibly super positions of such states. This is equivalent to a photon being associated with an irreducible representation of the Poincaré group. A brief overview of the general theory of group representations is given in Appendix 3. We will be able to give a complete discussion of the representations of the Poincaré group pertinent to the photon. Our discussion of localizability will be quite rigorous but we will gloss over measure-theoretic niceties. For more mathematical discussions the reader can refer to the works of Mackey (1978) and Wightman (1962). We will finish the chapter by examining the implication of Poincaré invariance for the metric on the space of quantum states of the photon.
During these three years we focused on several topics in quantum otpics and quantum electrodynamics. A central theme in our investigations is that of the photon wave function. Can quantum optics and quantum electrodynamics experiments be described simply, in position space, with the help of a wave function describing the photon(s) featured in the experiment ? The answer to that question is not quite obvious: the usual description of photons takes place in the reciprocal space of wave vectors. But these experiments call for a wave mechanical description in the position representation, as is done in quantum mechanics textbooks in situations featuring massive particles. Moreover, in a recent experiment [1], single photon trajectories through a Young two-slit setup have been observed. In order to try and describe these trajectories formally, it is natural to build a wave mechanical formalism for photons. We therefore studied in detail the formal construction of the photon wave function, an object which was little studied until the 1990s. We also studied the properties of the photon wave function in the presence of sources.To do that, we considered several open (interacting) quantum systems. We saw that there exists in principle an infinite number of possibilities when defining the photon wave function. We emphasised several criteria on the basis of which it appears that only three choices for the wave function are interesting. One of them coincides with an object introduced and used by Glauber [2] to study light detection andthe correlations of the electromagnetic field in the quantum regime. We also saw that, in the absence of sources, the propagation equation for a single photon is formally equivalent to Maxwell’s equations. At low photon numbers, the wave function formalism can be very useful. We adapted it to interacting systems,first, to cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) [3], in particular to the experiments carried out by Serge Haroche’s group [4]. We proposed a simple model to describe photons in QED cavities. With this model, and with the helpof the photon wave function, we studied the propagation of photons escaping a cavity. We also constructed the Lindblad master equation without introducing nonunitary quantum jumps (also see [5]). We finally investigated the spacetime evolution of a photon which is emitted during the decay of an atomic electron. After having carefully studied the dynamics of the electronic decay, especially at very short times [6, 7], we set out to describe the emitted electromagnetic field as rigorously as possible. This emitted field, surprisingly, does not evolve causally. Though this is not entirely unexpected in view of Hegerfeldt’s theorem, which states [8] that causality is impossible for quantum systems which are described by a Hamiltonian with a spectrum which is bounded by below, we identified [9] two other sources of non causality. One of them was predicted qualitatively by Shirokov [10], while the other one, which is completely new as far as we can tell, is still to be better understood
Non-classical light sources are now being developed in more and more laboratories. Their noise reduction properties are potentially important for technology. Examples are squeezed and antibunched light sources. It is tempting to picture in some of these processes single photons flying through space. In non-relativistic quantum mechanics it is easy to discuss the properties of particle localisation in a general context without recourse to a particular experimental configuration. A position operator exists and the localised states are just the eigenstates of this operator. The situation in relativistic quantum mechanics (or field theory) is not as straightforward. The photon is relativistic and it has the addi-tional property of being massless. It has no position operator associated with it. Yet, nevertheless, it is possible to pose the question of finding a generic construction for a wave packet for the photon which is localised as far as possible in some (imaginary) box in space. The difficulty of the construction follows from the fact that in an electromagnetic wave the polarisation is perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Thus we need to construct a vector field which is localised and has this transverse property related to the masslessness of the photon.
A first-quantized free photon is a complex massless vector field A=(Aμ) whose field strength satisfies Maxwell’s equations in vacuum. We construct the Hilbert space H of the photon by endowing the vector space of the fields A in the temporal-Coulomb gauge with a positive-definite and relativistically invariant inner product. We give an explicit expression for this inner product, identify the Hamiltonian for the photon with the generator of time translations in H, determine the operators representing the momentum and the helicity of the photon, and introduce a chirality operator whose eigenfunctions correspond to fields having a definite sign of energy. We also construct a position operator for the photon whose components commute with each other and with the chirality and helicity operators. This allows for the construction of the localized states of the photon with a definite sign of energy and helicity. We derive an explicit formula for the latter and compute the corresponding electric and magnetic fields. These turn out to diverge not just at the point where the photon is localized but on a plane containing this point. We identify the axis normal to this plane with an associated symmetry axis and show that each choice of this axis specifies a particular position operator, a corresponding position basis, and a position representation of the quantum mechanics of a photon. In particular, we examine the position wave functions determined by such a position basis, elucidate their relationship with the Riemann-Silberstein and Landau-Peierls wave functions, and give an explicit formula for the probability density of the spatial localization of the photon.
La fonction d'onde du photon en principe et en pratique Pendant ces trois ans, nous nous sommes intéressés à quelques sujets choisis en optique et en électrodynamique quantiques. Le fil rouge de nos interrogations est la fonction d’onde du photon. Les expériences d’optique et d’électrodynamique quantique peuvent-elles être décrites de manière simple, dans l’espace des positions, à l’aide d’une fonction d’onde décrivant le ou les photon(s) impliqués dans l’expérience ? Ce n’est pas entièrement évident :la description usuelle des photons se fait dans l’espace réciproque des vecteurs d’onde. Mais ces expériences gagnent à être décrites par la mécanique ondulatoire en représentation position, comme cela est fait dans les manuels de mécanique quantique pour des situations impliquant des particules massives. De surcroît, une expérience récente[1] a conduit à l’observation de trajectoires de photons uniques à travers un interféromètre à deux fentes d’Young.Pour essayer de décrire formellement ces trajectoires, il est naturel de formuler une mécanique ondulatoire pour les photons. Nous avons donc examiné en détail la construction formelle de la fonction d’onde du photon, un objet qui est resté peu étudié jusqu’aux années 1990. Nous avons également étudié les propriétés de la fonction d’onde du photon en présence de sources, et considéré pour ce faire divers systèmes quantiques ouverts (en interaction). Nous avons vu qu’il existe, en principe, une infinité de possibilités pour le choix de la fonction d’onde du photon.Nous avons mis en évidence un certain nombre de critères sur la base desquels il apparaît que seuls trois choix parmi tous ceux possibles sont intéressants, l’un d’entre eux ramenant à un objet introduit par Glauber [2] pour étudier la détection de la lumière et les corrélations du champ électromagnétique. Nous avons également vu qu’en l’absence de sources l’équation quantique de propagation des photons est formellement identique aux équations de Maxwell.À bas nombre de photons, le formalisme de la fonction d’onde peut se révéler très pratique. Nous avons adapté l’approche aux systèmes en interaction, en nous intéressant dans un premier temps à l’électrodynamique quantique1en cavité [3], en particulier aux expériences réalisées par le groupe de Serge Haroche [4]. Nous avons proposé un modèle simple pour la description des photons dans les cavités d’électrodynamique. À l’aide de ce modèle, et de la fonction d’onde du photon, nous avons étudié la propagation des photons s’échappant de la cavité. Nous avons également construit l’équation maîtresse de Lindblad sans introduire de sauts quantiques non unitaires (voir également [5]). Nous nous sommes enfin intéressés à la question de l’évolution spatiotemporelle d’un photon émis lors d’une désexcitation d’un électron atomique. Après avoir étudié soigneusement la dynamique de la désexcitation de l’électron, notamment aux temps très courts [6, 7], nous nous sommes attachés à décrire, aussi rigoureusement que possible, le champ électromagnétique émis. Celui-ci, de manière surprenante, n’évolue pas causalement. Si cela n’est pas entièrement inattendu au vu du théorème de Hegerfeldt, qui stipule [8] que la causalité est exclue pour les systèmes décrits par un Hamiltonien dont le spectre est borné inférieurement, nous avons identifié [9] deux autres sources de non-causalité, l’une, prédite qualitativement par Shirokov [10], et l’autre, entièrement nouvelle à notre connaissance, et dont la compréhension reste à affiner.