Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Shock waves in a 1D Bose gas: from a BEC to a Tonks gas

Bogdan Damski

Published Jun 8, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Shock Waves in the BEC to BCS Crossover of a Fermi Gas

Lorin Baird, James A. Joseph, John E. Thomas

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 26, 2016•0 citations

Shock waves in a one-dimensional Bose gas: From a Bose-Einstein condensate to a Tonks gas

Bogdan Damski

We derive and analyze shock-wave solutions of hydrodynamic equations describing repulsively interacting one-dimensional Bose gas. We also use the number-conserving Bogolubov approach to verify accuracy of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation in shock wave problems. We show that quantum corrections to dynamics of shocks (dark-shock-originated solitons) in a Bose-Einstein condensate are negligible (important) for a realistic set of system parameters. We point out possible signatures of a Bose-Einstein condensate---Tonks crossover in shock dynamics. Our findings can be directly verified in different experimental setups.

arXiv:cond-mat/0506210•Physical Review A•Apr 3, 2006•40 citations

Shock waves in quasi one-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate

Luca Salasnich

arXiv:1504.07517•The European Physical Journal Plus•Mar 1, 2016•7 citations

Dispersive and classical shock waves in Bose-Einstein condensates and gas dynamics

Mark A. Hoefer, Mark J. Ablowitz, Ian R. Coddington +3 more

A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is a quantum fluid that gives rise to interesting shock-wave nonlinear dynamics. Experiments depict a BEC that exhibits behavior similar to that of a shock wave in a compressible gas, e.g., traveling fronts with steep gradients. However, the governing Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equation that describes the mean field of a BEC admits no dissipation, hence classical dissipative shock solutions do not explain the phenomena. Instead, wave dynamics with small dispersion is considered and it is shown that this provides a mechanism for the generation of a dispersive shock wave (DSW). Computations with the GP equation are compared to experiment with excellent agreement. A comparison between a canonical one-dimensional (1D) dissipative and dispersive shock problem shows significant differences in shock structure and shock-front speed. Numerical results associated with the three-dimensional experiment show that three- and two-dimensional approximations are in excellent agreement and 1D approximations are in good qualitative agreement. Using 1D DSW theory, it is argued that the experimentally observed blast waves may be viewed as dispersive shock waves.

arXiv:cond-mat/0603389•Physical Review A•Aug 29, 2006•318 citations

Wave functions of the super-Tonks-Girardeau gas and the trapped one-dimensional hard-sphere Bose gas

Marvin D. Girardeau, G. E. Astrakharchik

Recent theoretical and experimental results demonstrate a close connection between the super-Tonks-Girardeau (STG) gas and a one-dimensional (1D) hard-sphere Bose (HSB) gas with hard-sphere diameter nearly equal to the 1D scattering length ${a}_{1\mathrm{D}}$ of the STG gas, a highly excited gaslike state with nodes only at interparticle separations $|{x}_{j\ensuremath{\ell}}|={x}_{\mathrm{node}}\ensuremath{\approx}{a}_{1\mathrm{D}}$. It is shown herein that when the coupling constant ${g}_{B}$ in the Lieb-Liniger interaction ${g}_{B}\ensuremath{\delta}({x}_{j\ensuremath{\ell}})$ is negative and $|{x}_{12}|\ensuremath{\geqslant}{x}_{\mathrm{node}}$, the STG and HSB wave functions for $N=2$ particles are not merely similar, but identical; the only difference between the STG and HSB wave functions is that the STG wave function allows a small penetration into the region $|{x}_{12}|<{x}_{\mathrm{node}}$, whereas for a HSB gas with hard-sphere diameter ${a}_{\mathrm{hs}}={x}_{\mathrm{node}}$, the HSB wave function vanishes when $|{x}_{12}|<{a}_{\mathrm{hs}}$. Arguments are given suggesting that the same theorem holds also for $N>2$. The STG and HSB wave functions for $N=2$ are given exactly in terms of a parabolic cylinder function, and for $N\ensuremath{\geqslant}2$, ${x}_{\mathrm{node}}$ is given accurately by a simple parabola. The metastability of the STG phase generated by a sudden change of the coupling constant from large positive to large negative values is explained in terms of the very small overlap between the ground state of the Tonks-Girardeau gas and collapsed cluster states.

arXiv:0912.1633•Physical Review A•Jun 21, 2010•35 citations

Supersonic effects and shock waves in a Bose–Einstein condensate

Michail A. Zak, Igor K. Kulikov

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 2003•10 citations
We derive and analyze shock-wave solutions of hydrodynamic equations describing repulsively interacting one-dimensional Bose gas. We also use the number-conserving Bogolubov approach to verify accuracy of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation in shock wave problems. We show that quantum corrections to dynamics of shocks (dark-shock-originated solitons) in a Bose-Einstein condensate are negligible (important) for a realistic set of system parameters. We point out possible signatures of a Bose-Einstein condensate---Tonks crossover in shock dynamics. Our findings can be directly verified in different experimental setups.
A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is a quantum fluid that gives rise to interesting shock-wave nonlinear dynamics. Experiments depict a BEC that exhibits behavior similar to that of a shock wave in a compressible gas, e.g., traveling fronts with steep gradients. However, the governing Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) equation that describes the mean field of a BEC admits no dissipation, hence classical dissipative shock solutions do not explain the phenomena. Instead, wave dynamics with small dispersion is considered and it is shown that this provides a mechanism for the generation of a dispersive shock wave (DSW). Computations with the GP equation are compared to experiment with excellent agreement. A comparison between a canonical one-dimensional (1D) dissipative and dispersive shock problem shows significant differences in shock structure and shock-front speed. Numerical results associated with the three-dimensional experiment show that three- and two-dimensional approximations are in excellent agreement and 1D approximations are in good qualitative agreement. Using 1D DSW theory, it is argued that the experimentally observed blast waves may be viewed as dispersive shock waves.
Recent theoretical and experimental results demonstrate a close connection between the super-Tonks-Girardeau (STG) gas and a one-dimensional (1D) hard-sphere Bose (HSB) gas with hard-sphere diameter nearly equal to the 1D scattering length a1D{a}_{1\mathrm{D}}a1D​ of the STG gas, a highly excited gaslike state with nodes only at interparticle separations $|{x}_{j\ensuremath{\ell}}|={x}_{\mathrm{node}}\ensuremath{\approx}{a}_{1\mathrm{D}}$. It is shown herein that when the coupling constant gB{g}_{B}gB​ in the Lieb-Liniger interaction ${g}_{B}\ensuremath{\delta}({x}_{j\ensuremath{\ell}})$ is negative and $|{x}_{12}|\ensuremath{\geqslant}{x}_{\mathrm{node}}$, the STG and HSB wave functions for N=2N=2N=2 particles are not merely similar, but identical; the only difference between the STG and HSB wave functions is that the STG wave function allows a small penetration into the region ∣x12∣<xnode|{x}_{12}|<{x}_{\mathrm{node}}∣x12​∣<xnode​, whereas for a HSB gas with hard-sphere diameter ahs=xnode{a}_{\mathrm{hs}}={x}_{\mathrm{node}}ahs​=xnode​, the HSB wave function vanishes when ∣x12∣<ahs|{x}_{12}|<{a}_{\mathrm{hs}}∣x12​∣<ahs​. Arguments are given suggesting that the same theorem holds also for N>2N>2N>2. The STG and HSB wave functions for N=2N=2N=2 are given exactly in terms of a parabolic cylinder function, and for $N\ensuremath{\geqslant}2$, xnode{x}_{\mathrm{node}}xnode​ is given accurately by a simple parabola. The metastability of the STG phase generated by a sudden change of the coupling constant from large positive to large negative values is explained in terms of the very small overlap between the ground state of the Tonks-Girardeau gas and collapsed cluster states.