We present two experiments testing the hypothesis of noncontextual hidden variables. The first one is based on observation of two-photon pseudo-Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger correlations, with two of the originally three particles mimicked by the polarization degree of freedom and the spatial degree of freedom of a single photon. The second one, a single-photon experiment, utilizes the same trick to emulate two particle correlations, and is an "event ready" test of a Bell-like inequality, derived from the noncontextuality assumption. Modulo fair sampling, the data falsify noncontextual hidden variables.We present two experiments testing the hypothesis of noncontextual hidden variables. The first one is based on observation of two-photon pseudo-Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger correlations, with two of the originally three particles mimicked by the polarization degree of freedom and the spatial degree of freedom of a single photon. The second one, a single-photon experiment, utilizes the same trick to emulate two particle correlations, and is an "event ready" test of a Bell-like inequality, derived from the noncontextuality assumption. Modulo fair sampling, the data falsify noncontextual hidden variables.

arXiv:quant-ph/0009061Physical Review LettersJun 12, 2000122 citations

Single-Photon Techniques

R. Edward Coleman

Jan 1, 20030 citations

Single Photons

M. Bertolotti

History of physicsJan 1, 20260 citations

The EinsteinAandBcoefficients

Geoffrey Brooker

Abstract The Einstein A and B coefficients for atom–photon reactions are defined: they describe absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission. We calculate B and consequently find A by the Einstein trick. The procedure is validated by application of detailed balance. Separating out frequencies permits introduction of the spectral lineshape function (normalized line profile). A reformulation describes transitions involving single atomic states and single field modes. This points to a link with quantum electrodynamics.Abstract The Einstein A and B coefficients for atom–photon reactions are defined: they describe absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission. We calculate B and consequently find A by the Einstein trick. The procedure is validated by application of detailed balance. Separating out frequencies permits introduction of the spectral lineshape function (normalized line profile). A reformulation describes transitions involving single atomic states and single field modes. This points to a link with quantum electrodynamics.

Jul 16, 20210 citations

Decoy-state quantum key distribution with more than three types of photon intensity pulses

H. F. Chau

The decoy-state method closes source security loopholes in quantum key distribution (QKD) using a laser source. In this method, accurate estimates of the detection rates of vacuum and single-photon events plus the error rate of single-photon events are needed to give a good enough lower bound of the secret key rate. Nonetheless, the current estimation method for these detection and error rates, which uses three types of photon intensities, is accurate up to about $1%$ relative error. Here I report an experimentally feasible way that greatly improves these estimates and hence increases the one-way key rate of the BB84 QKD protocol with unbiased bases selection by at least 20% on average in realistic settings. The major tricks are the use of more than three types of photon intensities plus the fact that estimating bounds of the above detection and error rates is numerically stable, although these bounds are related to the inversion of a high condition number matrix.The decoy-state method closes source security loopholes in quantum key distribution (QKD) using a laser source. In this method, accurate estimates of the detection rates of vacuum and single-photon events plus the error rate of single-photon events are needed to give a good enough lower bound of the secret key rate. Nonetheless, the current estimation method for these detection and error rates, which uses three types of photon intensities, is accurate up to about $1%$ relative error. Here I report an experimentally feasible way that greatly improves these estimates and hence increases the one-way key rate of the BB84 QKD protocol with unbiased bases selection by at least 20% on average in realistic settings. The major tricks are the use of more than three types of photon intensities plus the fact that estimating bounds of the above detection and error rates is numerically stable, although these bounds are related to the inversion of a high condition number matrix.

arXiv:1712.00727Physical Review AApr 2, 201824 citations

Shaping single photons

Axel Kuhn

Jan 1, 20120 citations

1%

relative error. Here I report an experimentally feasible way that greatly improves these estimates and hence increases the one-way key rate of the BB84 QKD protocol with unbiased bases selection by at least 20% on average in realistic settings. The major tricks are the use of more than three types of photon intensities plus the fact that estimating bounds of the above detection and error rates is numerically stable, although these bounds are related to the inversion of a high condition number matrix.