Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE)

A control-theoretic interpretation of the Schrödinger equation

Akira Ohsumi

Published Sep 1, 2017• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this paper, for a given Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics, an interpretation of it is investigated from the stochastic control-theoretic point of view.
DOI
10.23919/sice.2017.8105436

Related papers

An interpretation of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics from the control-theoretic point of view

Akira Ohsumi

Automatica•Nov 12, 2018•8 citations

Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation in Quantum Mechanics from Stochastic Control Theory

Akira Ohsumi

In this paper, the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics is derived as stochastic quantization from the stochastic optimal control theory based on the Nelson stochastic mechanics.

Proceedings of the ISCIE International Symposium on Stochastic Systems Theory and its Applications•Jul 31, 2019•0 citations

A Stochastic Control Verification Theorem for the Dequantized Schrödinger Equation Not Requiring a Duration Restriction

William M. McEneaney

Applied Mathematics & Optimization•Aug 29, 2017•12 citations

Origin of the quantum observable operator algebra in the frame of stochastic mechanics

Francesco Guerra, R. Marra

In previous work the approach to stochastic quantization, originally proposed by Nelson, has been formulated in the frame of the stochastic variational principles of control theory. Then the Hamilton-Jacobi-Madelung equation is interpreted as the programming equation of the controlled problem, to be associated with the hydrodynamical continuity equation. Here we point out explicitly the canonical Hamiltonian structure of these equations, by introducing a suitable symplectic structure on the underlying phase space in various representations. One possible representation leads to the Schr\"odinger equation, which, together with its complex conjugate, can be recognized as a particular form of the Hamilton canonical equations in this frame. Then a suitably selected time-invariant subalgebra of the classical hydrodynamical algebra, closed under Poisson bracket pairing, is shown to be connected to the standard quantum observable operator algebra. In this correspondence Poisson brackets for hydrodynamical observables become averages of quantum observables in the given state. From this point of view stochastic quantization can be interpreted as giving an explanation for the standard quantization procedure of replacing the classical particle (or field) observables with operators, according to the scheme $p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(\frac{h}{i})\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}}{\ensuremath{\partial}x}$, $l\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(\frac{h}{i})\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}}{\ensuremath{\partial}\ensuremath{\varphi}}$, etc. This discussion shows also the relevance of the canonical symplectic structure of the quantum state space, a feature which seems to have been overlooked in the axiomatic approaches to quantum mechanics.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Oct 15, 1983•35 citations

Some remarks on the integration of Schrödinger equation using the quantum stochastic calculus

Kalyanapuram Rangachari Parthasarathy

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1985•2 citations

A Bird’s-Eye View on a New Stochastic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Olavo Leopoldino da Silva Filho, Marcello Caio Ramon e Barros Ferreira

Since the early twentieth century, quantum mechanics has sought an interpretation that offers a consistent worldview. In the course of that, many proposals were advanced, but all of them introduce, at some point, interpretation elements (semantics) that find no correlate in the formalism (syntactics). This distance from semantics and syntactics is one of the major reasons for finding so abstruse and diverse interpretations of the formalism. To overcome this issue, we propose an alternative stochastic interpretation, based exclusively on the formal structure of the Schrödinger equation, without resorting to external assumptions such as the collapse of the wave function or the role of the observer. We present four (mathematically equivalent) mathematical derivations of the Schrödinger equation based on four constructs: characteristic function, Boltzmann entropy, Central Limit Theorem (CLT), and Langevin equation. All of them resort to axioms already interpreted and offer complementary perspectives to the quantum formalism. The results show the possibility of deriving the Schrödinger equation from well-defined probabilistic principles and that the wave function represents a probability amplitude in the configuration space, with dispersions linked to the CLT. It is concluded that quantum mechanics has a stochastic support, originating from the separation between particle and field subsystems, allowing an objective description of quantum behavior as a mean-field theory, analogous, but not equal, to Brownian motion, without the need for arbitrary ontological entities.

Mathematics•Nov 6, 2025•3 citations
In previous work the approach to stochastic quantization, originally proposed by Nelson, has been formulated in the frame of the stochastic variational principles of control theory. Then the Hamilton-Jacobi-Madelung equation is interpreted as the programming equation of the controlled problem, to be associated with the hydrodynamical continuity equation. Here we point out explicitly the canonical Hamiltonian structure of these equations, by introducing a suitable symplectic structure on the underlying phase space in various representations. One possible representation leads to the Schr\"odinger equation, which, together with its complex conjugate, can be recognized as a particular form of the Hamilton canonical equations in this frame. Then a suitably selected time-invariant subalgebra of the classical hydrodynamical algebra, closed under Poisson bracket pairing, is shown to be connected to the standard quantum observable operator algebra. In this correspondence Poisson brackets for hydrodynamical observables become averages of quantum observables in the given state. From this point of view stochastic quantization can be interpreted as giving an explanation for the standard quantization procedure of replacing the classical particle (or field) observables with operators, according to the scheme $p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(\frac{h}{i})\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}}{\ensuremath{\partial}x}$, $l\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(\frac{h}{i})\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}}{\ensuremath{\partial}\ensuremath{\varphi}}$, etc. This discussion shows also the relevance of the canonical symplectic structure of the quantum state space, a feature which seems to have been overlooked in the axiomatic approaches to quantum mechanics.
Since the early twentieth century, quantum mechanics has sought an interpretation that offers a consistent worldview. In the course of that, many proposals were advanced, but all of them introduce, at some point, interpretation elements (semantics) that find no correlate in the formalism (syntactics). This distance from semantics and syntactics is one of the major reasons for finding so abstruse and diverse interpretations of the formalism. To overcome this issue, we propose an alternative stochastic interpretation, based exclusively on the formal structure of the Schrödinger equation, without resorting to external assumptions such as the collapse of the wave function or the role of the observer. We present four (mathematically equivalent) mathematical derivations of the Schrödinger equation based on four constructs: characteristic function, Boltzmann entropy, Central Limit Theorem (CLT), and Langevin equation. All of them resort to axioms already interpreted and offer complementary perspectives to the quantum formalism. The results show the possibility of deriving the Schrödinger equation from well-defined probabilistic principles and that the wave function represents a probability amplitude in the configuration space, with dispersions linked to the CLT. It is concluded that quantum mechanics has a stochastic support, originating from the separation between particle and field subsystems, allowing an objective description of quantum behavior as a mean-field theory, analogous, but not equal, to Brownian motion, without the need for arbitrary ontological entities.