Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

A Note on Quantum Coherence

Lili Wang, Zhengli Chen, Wenhua Wang, Ling Lu

Published Nov 29, 2017• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-017-3611-4

Related papers

Notes on quantum coherence with $$l_1$$-norm and convex-roof $$l_1$$-norm

Jiayao Zhu, Jian Ma, Tinggui Zhang

Quantum Information Processing•Nov 23, 2021•1 citation

Quantum Coherence

José Tito Mendonça, Hugo Terças

Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics•Oct 8, 2012•0 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Coherence in Crystals and the UAT Phase-Lattice Analogy: A Conceptual Note

Miguel Percudani

This submission presents a conceptual note exploring the analogy between two phenomena: (1) the experimentally demonstrated persistence of quantum coherence and entanglement in macroscopic systems at room temperature, and (2) the phase-lattice architecture of the 8-coil interferometer developed within the UAT/UCP framework. The note cites three peer-reviewed experimental breakthroughs: Lee et al., Science 334, 1253–1256 (2011): Entangling macroscopic diamonds at room temperature using femtosecond laser pulses and collective phonon modes. Kotler et al., Science 372, 622–625 (2021): Direct observation of quantum entanglement between macroscopic aluminum drumheads containing trillions of atoms. Aspelmeyer et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014): Cavity optomechanics and the geometric protection of coherence in engineered periodic structures. The common principle identified is that rigid geometric coupling of many degrees of freedom into a collective mode can shield global coherence from local thermal fluctuations. The note draws a conceptual parallel to the UAT 8-coil phase interferometer, where the precise phase step of 43.515° (derived from the quantum braking factor k_early = 0.967) creates an electromagnetic phase lattice. In this analogy, the Ivancho limit (κ_crit = 4.978) corresponds to the coherence threshold, and the 7% thermal calibration margin corresponds to the noise absorption buffer. Limitations are explicitly acknowledged: the physical substrates are different (phononic vs. electromagnetic), the coherence timescales differ, no direct experimental link exists between the two phenomena, and the UAT framework is not validated by these experiments. The note is a conceptual reflection, not a claim of experimental confirmation. The package includes the LaTeX manuscript.

•Jul 11, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Coherence

W. Pötz, Ulrich Hohenester, Jaroslav Fabian

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2006•11 citations

Quantum coherence

Karen Southwell

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Coherence in Crystals and the UAT Phase-Lattice Analogy: A Conceptual Note

Miguel Percudani

This submission presents a conceptual note exploring the analogy between two phenomena: (1) the experimentally demonstrated persistence of quantum coherence and entanglement in macroscopic systems at room temperature, and (2) the phase-lattice architecture of the 8-coil interferometer developed within the UAT/UCP framework. The note cites three peer-reviewed experimental breakthroughs: Lee et al., Science 334, 1253–1256 (2011): Entangling macroscopic diamonds at room temperature using femtosecond laser pulses and collective phonon modes. Kotler et al., Science 372, 622–625 (2021): Direct observation of quantum entanglement between macroscopic aluminum drumheads containing trillions of atoms. Aspelmeyer et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014): Cavity optomechanics and the geometric protection of coherence in engineered periodic structures. The common principle identified is that rigid geometric coupling of many degrees of freedom into a collective mode can shield global coherence from local thermal fluctuations. The note draws a conceptual parallel to the UAT 8-coil phase interferometer, where the precise phase step of 43.515° (derived from the quantum braking factor k_early = 0.967) creates an electromagnetic phase lattice. In this analogy, the Ivancho limit (κ_crit = 4.978) corresponds to the coherence threshold, and the 7% thermal calibration margin corresponds to the noise absorption buffer. Limitations are explicitly acknowledged: the physical substrates are different (phononic vs. electromagnetic), the coherence timescales differ, no direct experimental link exists between the two phenomena, and the UAT framework is not validated by these experiments. The note is a conceptual reflection, not a claim of experimental confirmation. The package includes the LaTeX manuscript.

•Jul 11, 2026•0 citations
Notes on quantum coherence with l1l_1l1​-norm and convex-roof l1l_1l1​-norm
This submission presents a conceptual note exploring the analogy between two phenomena: (1) the experimentally demonstrated persistence of quantum coherence and entanglement in macroscopic systems at room temperature, and (2) the phase-lattice architecture of the 8-coil interferometer developed within the UAT/UCP framework. The note cites three peer-reviewed experimental breakthroughs: Lee et al., Science 334, 1253–1256 (2011): Entangling macroscopic diamonds at room temperature using femtosecond laser pulses and collective phonon modes. Kotler et al., Science 372, 622–625 (2021): Direct observation of quantum entanglement between macroscopic aluminum drumheads containing trillions of atoms. Aspelmeyer et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014): Cavity optomechanics and the geometric protection of coherence in engineered periodic structures. The common principle identified is that rigid geometric coupling of many degrees of freedom into a collective mode can shield global coherence from local thermal fluctuations. The note draws a conceptual parallel to the UAT 8-coil phase interferometer, where the precise phase step of 43.515° (derived from the quantum braking factor k_early = 0.967) creates an electromagnetic phase lattice. In this analogy, the Ivancho limit (κ_crit = 4.978) corresponds to the coherence threshold, and the 7% thermal calibration margin corresponds to the noise absorption buffer. Limitations are explicitly acknowledged: the physical substrates are different (phononic vs. electromagnetic), the coherence timescales differ, no direct experimental link exists between the two phenomena, and the UAT framework is not validated by these experiments. The note is a conceptual reflection, not a claim of experimental confirmation. The package includes the LaTeX manuscript.
This submission presents a conceptual note exploring the analogy between two phenomena: (1) the experimentally demonstrated persistence of quantum coherence and entanglement in macroscopic systems at room temperature, and (2) the phase-lattice architecture of the 8-coil interferometer developed within the UAT/UCP framework. The note cites three peer-reviewed experimental breakthroughs: Lee et al., Science 334, 1253–1256 (2011): Entangling macroscopic diamonds at room temperature using femtosecond laser pulses and collective phonon modes. Kotler et al., Science 372, 622–625 (2021): Direct observation of quantum entanglement between macroscopic aluminum drumheads containing trillions of atoms. Aspelmeyer et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014): Cavity optomechanics and the geometric protection of coherence in engineered periodic structures. The common principle identified is that rigid geometric coupling of many degrees of freedom into a collective mode can shield global coherence from local thermal fluctuations. The note draws a conceptual parallel to the UAT 8-coil phase interferometer, where the precise phase step of 43.515° (derived from the quantum braking factor k_early = 0.967) creates an electromagnetic phase lattice. In this analogy, the Ivancho limit (κ_crit = 4.978) corresponds to the coherence threshold, and the 7% thermal calibration margin corresponds to the noise absorption buffer. Limitations are explicitly acknowledged: the physical substrates are different (phononic vs. electromagnetic), the coherence timescales differ, no direct experimental link exists between the two phenomena, and the UAT framework is not validated by these experiments. The note is a conceptual reflection, not a claim of experimental confirmation. The package includes the LaTeX manuscript.