Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Вестник Пермского университета Философия Психология Социология

THE HIDDEN MEANING OF HEISENBERG INEQUALITIES AND FREQUENCY INTERPRETATION OF WAVE FUNCTION

Russian Philosophical Society, Maxim Grigor’evich Godarev

Published Jan 1, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.17072/2078-7898/2017-3-335-340

Related papers

THE MEANING OF THE WAVE FUNCTION

World Scientific series in contemporary chemical physics•Dec 1, 2002•0 citations

Heisenberg and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Kristian Camilleri

•Feb 1, 2009•8 citations

PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF WAVE MECHANICS AND THE HYPOTHESIS OF HIDDEN PARAMETERS

Jean-Louis Destouches

•Jun 1, 1952•0 citations

Inequalities in the Heisenberg and Schrödinger Uncertainty Relations

Wu Jiao, Yuan Li

数学进展•Jul 3, 2019•0 citations

PHYSICAL MEANING OF BELL TYPE INEQUALITIES

F. Selleri

Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: Historical Analysis and Open Questions•May 1, 2000•1 citation

SOME NOTES ON AERTS' INTERPRETATION OF THE EPR-PARADOX AND THE VIOLATION OF BELL-INEQUALITIES

Wim Christiaens

I give an analysis of what happens in the case of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment according to the creation-discovery view. According to many physicists the correlations in the experiment indicating a violations of Bell-inequalities are cases of outcome-dependence and not parameter dependence. It is shown that we can interpret the outcome independence violating correlations as an indication that quantum entities do not always exist in space, and that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment involves a localization of one entity, that in the course of this localization is ‘broken’ into two entities.

•Jun 1, 2002•6 citations
I give an analysis of what happens in the case of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment according to the creation-discovery view. According to many physicists the correlations in the experiment indicating a violations of Bell-inequalities are cases of outcome-dependence and not parameter dependence. It is shown that we can interpret the outcome independence violating correlations as an indication that quantum entities do not always exist in space, and that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment involves a localization of one entity, that in the course of this localization is ‘broken’ into two entities.