Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science China Information Sciences

New constructions for (multiparty) one-round key exchange with strong security

Zheng Yang, Junyu Lai

Published Nov 17, 2017• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11432-017-9177-7

Related papers

One-Round Key Exchange with Strong Security: An Efficient and Generic Construction in the Standard Model

Florian Bergsma, Tibor Jager, Jörg Schwenk

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2015•33 citations

Strongly Secure One-Round Group Authenticated Key Exchange in the Standard Model

Yong Li, Zheng Yang

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•7 citations

Strongly Secure One Round Authenticated Key Exchange Protocol with Perfect Forward Security

Hai Huang

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•11 citations

Two-Round Multiparty Secure Computation Minimizing Public Key Operations

Sanjam Garg, Peihan Miao, Akshayaram Srinivasan

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2018•7 citations

Simpler Generic Constructions for Strongly Secure One-round Key Exchange from Weaker Assumptions

Zheng Yang, Junyu Lai, Chao Liu +2 more

In PKC 2015, Bergsma et al. introduced a generic one-round key exchange (ORKE) protocol (which is referred to as BJS) from digital signature (SIG) and simplified non-interactive key exchange (NIKE) without involving any identity. The BJS scheme is shown to satisfy extended Canetti and Krawczyk-PFS security if the NIKE is adaptive-CKS-light secure and the SIG is strongly secure against existential unforgeability under chosen message attacks. However, the BJS scheme cannot be instantiated with NIKE scheme with identity (e.g. the one proposed by Boneh and Zhandry in Crypto 2014). In this paper, we propose a much simpler generic construction for ORKE from NIKE and SIG. In particular, our scheme only makes weaker security assumptions on the underlying building blocks. Namely, we first show that the static-CKS-light security of NIKE, where the target identities are chosen by the adversary before seeing the system parameters, is sufficient for our construction. On the second, we observe that the SIG only needs to provide strong existential unforgeability under weak chosen message attacks for our construction. These results enable our proposal to have more concrete instantiations which might be easier to build and realize. At the same time, our new protocol is much more computationally efficient than the BJS protocol.

The Computer Journal•Nov 10, 2016•7 citations

One-Round Protocols for Two-Party Authenticated Key Exchange

Ik Rae Jeong, Jonathan I. Katz, Dong Hoon Lee

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2004•106 citations
In PKC 2015, Bergsma et al. introduced a generic one-round key exchange (ORKE) protocol (which is referred to as BJS) from digital signature (SIG) and simplified non-interactive key exchange (NIKE) without involving any identity. The BJS scheme is shown to satisfy extended Canetti and Krawczyk-PFS security if the NIKE is adaptive-CKS-light secure and the SIG is strongly secure against existential unforgeability under chosen message attacks. However, the BJS scheme cannot be instantiated with NIKE scheme with identity (e.g. the one proposed by Boneh and Zhandry in Crypto 2014). In this paper, we propose a much simpler generic construction for ORKE from NIKE and SIG. In particular, our scheme only makes weaker security assumptions on the underlying building blocks. Namely, we first show that the static-CKS-light security of NIKE, where the target identities are chosen by the adversary before seeing the system parameters, is sufficient for our construction. On the second, we observe that the SIG only needs to provide strong existential unforgeability under weak chosen message attacks for our construction. These results enable our proposal to have more concrete instantiations which might be easier to build and realize. At the same time, our new protocol is much more computationally efficient than the BJS protocol.