Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Mathematics Enthusiast

PHYS 452.01: Quantum Physics of the Atom

E. Uchimoto

Published Jan 1, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

PHYS 452.01: Quantum Physics of the Atom

Andrew S. Ware

The Mathematics Enthusiast•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Bohr’s molecular model and the melding of classical and quantum mechanics

Leonard D. Mlodinow

Permit me to add some information to the article entitled, “Bohr’s molecular model, a century later.” The authors discuss the idea of “dimensional scaling,” approximating the spectra of atoms and molecules by employing perturbation theory to expand around the infinite-dimension/classical limit. That technique of approximating the Schrödinger equation, originally called the 1/N expansion, was developed and applied to numerous problems in the 1980s, including simple atoms, quarkonium, and the hydrogen molecule.11. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0,22. C. M. Bender, L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1305 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.1305,33. T. Imbo, U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2655 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2655M. Kumar, A. Srivastava, J. K. Bhattacharjee, K. Banerjee, Phys. Lett. A 117, 226 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90081-2 It grew out of attempts in the 1970s to formulate quantum chromodynamics in the limit of a large number of colors. The use of the 1/N expansion in atomic physics was discussed by Edward Witten (Physics Today, July 1980, page 38), who pointed out that his discussion was based on work that applied the method to hydrogen and helium atoms.11. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0The work in reference 11. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0 made use of algebraic methods for the analysis, but the coordinate space method was also developed and was initially used to treat the strong-field Zeeman effect.22. C. M. Bender, L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1305 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.1305 A nice description of the status of the field at the time was given by Laurence Yaffe (Physics Today, August 1983, page 50). Many additional applications of that method in the physics literature may be found in reference 44. A. Chatterjee, Phys. Rep. 186, 249 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(90)90048-7.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<1. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 , Google ScholarCrossref, ISIL. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0, , Google ScholarCrossref, ISI2. C. M. Bender, L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1305 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.1305, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI3. T. Imbo, U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2655 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2655, Google ScholarCrossref, ISIM. Kumar, A. Srivastava, J. K. Bhattacharjee, K. Banerjee, Phys. Lett. A 117, 226 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90081-2, , Google ScholarCrossref, ISI4. A. Chatterjee, Phys. Rep. 186, 249 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(90)90048-7, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI© 2014 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Aug 1, 2014•1 citation

PHYS 731-001: Quantum Mechanics II

Tao Zhou

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

PHYS 376 Quantum Mechanics I

Marco Fatuzzo

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Generation of artificial magnetic fields using dipole-dipole interactions

Alexandre Cesa, John Martin

In 1996, Lloyd [1] showed that the dynamics of complex many-body quantum systems can be efficiently simulated by quantum computers, an idea first put forward by Manin [2] and further developed by Feynman [3]. Although the first quantum computers of a few qubits have been realised experimentally [4, 5], the advent of scalable quantum computers might take another few decades. An alternative tool in the context of simulation is a highly controllable quantum system able to mimic the dynamics of other complex quantum systems, known as an analog quantum simulator. Cold neutral atoms and trapped ions have been shown to be versatile quantum simulators [6, 7] thanks to their high flexibility, controllability, and scalability. They permit one to study a wide range of problems arising from atomic physics, relativistic quantum physics, or cosmology [8]. Since neutral atoms do not carry any net charge, the simulation of electric and magnetic condensed matter phenomena, such as the spin Hall effect, seems out of reach. To overcome this apparent difficulty, the idea has been proposed to create artificial electromagnetic potentials for neutral atoms based on atom-light interaction [9– 12]. These artificial potentials act on neutral atoms as real electromagnetic potentials act on charged particles. Many works on artificial gauge potentials induced by atom-light interactions adopt a single-particle approach [12]. The predicted potentials are then supposed to be valid for a system of weakly interacting atoms. So far, the consequences of atom-atom interactions on the generation of artificial gauge fields has little been studied. The aim of this work is to study the artificial gauge fields arising from the interaction of two Rydberg atoms driven by a common laser field [13]. In this situation, we show that the combined atom-atom and atom-field interactions give rise to nonuniform, artificial gauge potentials. We identify the mechanism responsible for the emergence of these gauge potentials. Analytical expressions for the latter indicate that the strongest artificial magnetic fields are reached in the regime intermediate between the dipole blockade regime and the regime in which the atoms are sufficiently far apart such that atom-light interaction dominates over atom-atom interactions. We discuss the differences and similarities of artificial gauge fields originating from resonant dipole-dipole [14] and van der Waals [15] interactions. We also give an estimation of experimentally attainable artificial magnetic fields resulting from this mechanism and we discuss their detection through the deflection of the atomic motion. [1] S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996). [2] Yu. I. Manin, Computable and uncomputable, Sovetskoye Radio, Moscow, 1980. [3] R. P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982). [4] L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, Lev S. Bishop, B. R. Johnson, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Nature 460, 240 (2009). [5] N. Xu, J. Zhu, D. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Peng, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130501 (2012). [6] I. Buluta and F. Nori, Science 326, 108 (2009). [7] I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and S. Nascimbéne, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012). [8] R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012). [9] G. Juzeliunas and P. Öhberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 033602 (2004). [10] G. Juzeliunas, P. Öhberg, J. Ruseckas, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. A 71, 053614 (2005). [11] G. Juzeliunas, J. Ruseckas, P. Öhberg, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. A 73, 025602 (2006). [12] J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeliu ̄nas, and P. Öhberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523 (2011). [13] A. Cesa and J. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 88,062703 (2013). [14] A. Gaëtan, Y. Miroshnychenko, T. Wilk, A. Chotia, M. Viteau, D. Comparat, P. Pillet, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, Nature Physics 5, 115 (2009). [15] L. Béguin, A. Vernier, R. Chicireanu, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263201 (2013).

•Jun 23, 2014•0 citations

The quantum theory of the atom,

George Birtwistle

•Jan 1, 1926•0 citations
Permit me to add some information to the article entitled, “Bohr’s molecular model, a century later.” The authors discuss the idea of “dimensional scaling,” approximating the spectra of atoms and molecules by employing perturbation theory to expand around the infinite-dimension/classical limit. That technique of approximating the Schrödinger equation, originally called the 1/N expansion, was developed and applied to numerous problems in the 1980s, including simple atoms, quarkonium, and the hydrogen molecule.11. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0,22. C. M. Bender, L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1305 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.1305,33. T. Imbo, U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2655 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2655M. Kumar, A. Srivastava, J. K. Bhattacharjee, K. Banerjee, Phys. Lett. A 117, 226 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90081-2 It grew out of attempts in the 1970s to formulate quantum chromodynamics in the limit of a large number of colors. The use of the 1/N expansion in atomic physics was discussed by Edward Witten (Physics Today, July 1980, page 38), who pointed out that his discussion was based on work that applied the method to hydrogen and helium atoms.11. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0The work in reference 11. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0 made use of algebraic methods for the analysis, but the coordinate space method was also developed and was initially used to treat the strong-field Zeeman effect.22. C. M. Bender, L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1305 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.1305 A nice description of the status of the field at the time was given by Laurence Yaffe (Physics Today, August 1983, page 50). Many additional applications of that method in the physics literature may be found in reference 44. A. Chatterjee, Phys. Rep. 186, 249 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(90)90048-7.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<1. L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 128, 314 (1980); https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90323-1 , Google ScholarCrossref, ISIL. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Ann. Phys. 131, 1 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(81)90181-0, , Google ScholarCrossref, ISI2. C. M. Bender, L. D. Mlodinow, N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1305 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.1305, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI3. T. Imbo, U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2655 (1985); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2655, Google ScholarCrossref, ISIM. Kumar, A. Srivastava, J. K. Bhattacharjee, K. Banerjee, Phys. Lett. A 117, 226 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(86)90081-2, , Google ScholarCrossref, ISI4. A. Chatterjee, Phys. Rep. 186, 249 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(90)90048-7, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI© 2014 American Institute of Physics.
In 1996, Lloyd [1] showed that the dynamics of complex many-body quantum systems can be efficiently simulated by quantum computers, an idea first put forward by Manin [2] and further developed by Feynman [3]. Although the first quantum computers of a few qubits have been realised experimentally [4, 5], the advent of scalable quantum computers might take another few decades. An alternative tool in the context of simulation is a highly controllable quantum system able to mimic the dynamics of other complex quantum systems, known as an analog quantum simulator. Cold neutral atoms and trapped ions have been shown to be versatile quantum simulators [6, 7] thanks to their high flexibility, controllability, and scalability. They permit one to study a wide range of problems arising from atomic physics, relativistic quantum physics, or cosmology [8]. Since neutral atoms do not carry any net charge, the simulation of electric and magnetic condensed matter phenomena, such as the spin Hall effect, seems out of reach. To overcome this apparent difficulty, the idea has been proposed to create artificial electromagnetic potentials for neutral atoms based on atom-light interaction [9– 12]. These artificial potentials act on neutral atoms as real electromagnetic potentials act on charged particles. Many works on artificial gauge potentials induced by atom-light interactions adopt a single-particle approach [12]. The predicted potentials are then supposed to be valid for a system of weakly interacting atoms. So far, the consequences of atom-atom interactions on the generation of artificial gauge fields has little been studied. The aim of this work is to study the artificial gauge fields arising from the interaction of two Rydberg atoms driven by a common laser field [13]. In this situation, we show that the combined atom-atom and atom-field interactions give rise to nonuniform, artificial gauge potentials. We identify the mechanism responsible for the emergence of these gauge potentials. Analytical expressions for the latter indicate that the strongest artificial magnetic fields are reached in the regime intermediate between the dipole blockade regime and the regime in which the atoms are sufficiently far apart such that atom-light interaction dominates over atom-atom interactions. We discuss the differences and similarities of artificial gauge fields originating from resonant dipole-dipole [14] and van der Waals [15] interactions. We also give an estimation of experimentally attainable artificial magnetic fields resulting from this mechanism and we discuss their detection through the deflection of the atomic motion. [1] S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996). [2] Yu. I. Manin, Computable and uncomputable, Sovetskoye Radio, Moscow, 1980. [3] R. P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982). [4] L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, Lev S. Bishop, B. R. Johnson, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Nature 460, 240 (2009). [5] N. Xu, J. Zhu, D. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Peng, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130501 (2012). [6] I. Buluta and F. Nori, Science 326, 108 (2009). [7] I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and S. Nascimbéne, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012). [8] R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012). [9] G. Juzeliunas and P. Öhberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 033602 (2004). [10] G. Juzeliunas, P. Öhberg, J. Ruseckas, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. A 71, 053614 (2005). [11] G. Juzeliunas, J. Ruseckas, P. Öhberg, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. A 73, 025602 (2006). [12] J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeliu ̄nas, and P. Öhberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523 (2011). [13] A. Cesa and J. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 88,062703 (2013). [14] A. Gaëtan, Y. Miroshnychenko, T. Wilk, A. Chotia, M. Viteau, D. Comparat, P. Pillet, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, Nature Physics 5, 115 (2009). [15] L. Béguin, A. Vernier, R. Chicireanu, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263201 (2013).