The meticulous study of finite automata has produced many important and useful results. Automata are simple yet efficient finite state machines that can be utilized in a plethora of situations. It comes, therefore, as no surprise that they have been used in classic game theory in order to model players and their actions. Game theory has recently been influenced by ideas from the field of quantum computation. As a result, quantum versions of classic games have already been introduced and studied. The PQ penny flip game is a famous quantum game introduced by Meyer in 1999. In this paper we investigate all possible finite games that can be played between the two players Q and Picard of the original PQ game. For this purpose we establish a rigorous connection between finite automata and the PQ game along with all its possible variations. Starting from the automaton that corresponds to the original game, we construct more elaborate automata for certain extensions of the game, before finally presenting a semiautomaton that captures the intrinsic behavior of all possible variants of the PQ game. What this means is that from the semiautomaton in question, by setting appropriate initial and accepting states, one can construct deterministic automata able to capture every possible finite game that can be played between the two players Q and Picard. Moreover, we introduce the new concepts of a winning automaton and complete automaton for either player.
The meticulous study of finite automata has produced many important and useful results. Automata are simple yet efficient finite state machines that can be utilized in a plethora of situations. It comes, therefore, as no surprise that they have been used in classic game theory in order to model players and their actions. Game theory has recently been influenced by ideas from the field of quantum computation. As a result, quantum versions of classic games have already been introduced and studied. The PQ penny flip game is a famous quantum game introduced by Meyer in 1999. In this paper we investigate all possible finite games that can be played between the two players Q and Picard of the original PQ game. For this purpose we establish a rigorous connection between finite automata and the PQ game along with all its possible variations. Starting from the automaton that corresponds to the original game, we construct more elaborate automata for certain extensions of the game, before finally presenting a semiautomaton that captures the intrinsic behavior of all possible variants of the PQ game. What this means is that from the semiautomaton in question, by setting appropriate initial and accepting states, one can construct deterministic automata able to capture every possible finite game that can be played between the two players Q and Picard. Moreover, we introduce the new concepts of a winning automaton and complete automaton for either player.
This paper is inspired by the PQ penny flip game. It employs group-theoretic concepts to study the original game and its possible extensions. In this paper, it is shown that the PQ penny flip game can be associated, in a precise way, with the dihedral group D8 and that within D8 there exist precisely two classes of equivalent winning strategies for Q. This is achieved by proving that there are exactly two different sequences of states that can guarantee Q’s win with probability 1.0. It is demonstrated that the game can be played in every dihedral group D8n, where n≥1, without any significant change. A formal examination of what happens when Q can draw their moves from the entire U(2), leads to the conclusion that, again, there are exactly two classes of winning strategies for Q, each class containing an infinite number of equivalent strategies, but all of them sending the coin through the same sequence of states as before. Finally, when general extensions of the game, with the quantum player having U(2) at their disposal, are considered, a necessary and sufficient condition for Q to surely win against Picard is established: Q must make both the first and the last move in the game.
Game theory and its quantum extension apply in numerous fields that affect people’s social, political, and economical life. Physical limits imposed by the current technology used in computing architectures (e.g., circuit size) give rise to the need for novel mechanisms, such as quantum inspired computation. Elements from quantum computation and mechanics combined with game-theoretic aspects of computing could open new pathways towards the future technological era. This paper associates dominant strategies of repeated quantum games with quantum automata that recognize infinite periodic inputs. As a reference, we used the PQ-PENNY quantum game where the quantum strategy outplays the choice of pure or mixed strategy with probability 1 and therefore the associated quantum automaton accepts with probability 1. We also propose a novel game played on the evolution of an automaton, where players’ actions and strategies are also associated with periodic quantum automata.
The Quantum Penny Flip is a classic thought experiment in quantum mechanics that demonstrates the weird and counterintuitive nature of the quantum world. To solve the “PQ” problem, we proposed a quantum strategy selection and optimization algorithm, and designed a quantum algorithm for this problem. In terms of practical applications and Case study, this paper reviews the classic two player game – “PQ coin flipping” problem, and shows that when one of the participants adopts quantum strategies, he can defeat his classic opponent and obtain higher returns. By using quantitative methods, the entire “PQ” problem is placed under a more general and fair condition, and it is promoted and studied again from multiple aspects and perspectives. At the same time, this article provides the definitions of “incomplete fair game” and “complete fair game”, modifies the quantum coin flipping game [Meyer, Phys. Rev. lett. 82 (1999) 1052] to make the game fair, and studies the multi round versions of quantum coin flipping. We have drawn some basic conclusions about fair quantum games and explained the meaning of completely fair games in practice. We discussed the limitations and scalability of the “PQ” problem and looked forward to the future development direction of quantum game research.
In this paper, we formulate and analyze generalizations of the quantum penny flip game. In the penny flip game, one coin has two states, heads or tails, and two players apply alternating operations on the coin. In the original Meyer game, the first player is allowed to use quantum (i.e., non-commutative) operations, but the second player is still only allowed to use classical (i.e., commutative) operations. In our generalized games, both players are allowed to use non-commutative operations, with the second player being partially restricted in what operators they use. We show that even if the second player is allowed to use “phase-variable” operations, which are non-Abelian in general, the first player still has winning strategies. Furthermore, we show that even when the second player is allowed to choose one from two or more elements of the group |U(2)|, the second player has winning strategies under certain conditions. These results suggest that there is often a method for restoring the quantum state disturbed by another agent.
This paper reviews the coin flipping problem of PQ in a classical two-player game, and shows that when one player adopts quantum strategy, he can beat his classical opponent and gain higher returns. By means of quantitative means, the whole PQ problem is put in a more general and fair condition, and it is generalized and studied again from many aspects and angles. Finally, we get some more essential and important conclusions, and through some examples to explain the conclusions and its practical significances. At the same time, this paper gives the definitions of imperfect fair games and perfect fair games, revises the quantum coin flipping game to make the game fair, and studies a multi-round version of quantum coin flipping. Some basic conclusions of fair quantum game are obtained, and the meaning of perfectly fair game is explained in practice.
Abstract Two players of coin-flipping game randomly choose one of two strategies, flipping over or not. Meyer quantized states of the game to be described instead by density matrices of the two-dimensional Hilbert space. In order to obtain and unify generation of the two players coin-flipping game with more than two strategies, we renew the need for equivalently describing Meyer’s PQ coin-flipping game by representing player’s strategies as elements of permutation groups. Expanding the dimension of quantum vector to arbitrary N-dimension in the coin-flipping game model, we generalize Meyer’s PQ coin-flipping game to PQ arbitrary finite strategies game. Owing to the quantum Fourier transform, quantum contrivance of Q has a winning strategy in PQ coin-flipping game with arbitrary finite strategies. Even though the player Q has a small probability of winning his opponent in the classical PQ coin-flipping game with arbitrary finite strategies, he can win his opponent who uses classical mixed strategies by his quantum strategies. Furthermore, we realize the winning quantum strategies of quantum player Q of PQ coin-flipping game with arbitrary finite strategies in macro world.