Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering

Quantum security analysis of a lattice-based oblivious transfer protocol

Momeng Liu, Juliane Krämer, Yupu Hu, Johannes A Buchmann

Published Sep 1, 2017• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Because of the concise functionality of oblivious transfer (OT) protocols, they have been widely used as building blocks in secure multiparty computation and high-level protocols. The security of OT protocols built upon classical number theoretic problems, such as the discrete logarithm and factoring, however, is threatened as a result of the huge progress in quantum computing. Therefore, post-quantum cryptography is needed for protocols based on classical problems, and several proposals for post-quantum OT protocols exist. However, most post-quantum cryptosystems present their security proof only in the context of classical adversaries, not in the quantum setting. In this paper, we close this gap and prove the security of the lattice-based OT protocol proposed by Peikert et al. (CRYPTO, 2008), which is universally composably secure under the assumption of learning with errors hardness, in the quantum setting. We apply three general quantum security analysis frameworks. First, we apply the quantum lifting theorem proposed by Unruh (EUROCRYPT, 2010) to prove that the security of the lattice-based OT protocol can be lifted into the quantum world. Then, we apply two more security analysis frameworks specified for post-quantum cryptographic primitives, i.e., simple hybrid arguments (CRYPTO, 2011) and game-preserving reduction (PQCrypto, 2014).

DOI
10.1631/fitee.1700039

Related papers

A Note on Quantum Security for Post-Quantum Cryptography.

Fang Song

Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm and a few other efficient quantum algorithms break many clas-sical crypto-systems. In response, people proposed post-quantum cryptography based on computational problems that are believed hard even for quantum computers. However, security of these schemes against quantum attacks is elusive. This is because existing security analysis (almost) only deals with classical attackers and arguing security in the presence of quantum adversaries is challenging due to unique quan-tum features such as no-cloning. This work proposes a general framework to study which classical security proofs can be restored in the quantum setting. Basically, we split a security proof into (a sequence of) classical security reductions, and investigate what security reductions are “quantum-friendly”. We characterize sufficient conditions such that a classical reduction can be “lifted ” to the quantum setting. We then apply our lifting theorems to post-quantum signature schemes. We are able to show that the classical generic construction of hash-tree based signatures from one-way functions and and a more efficient variant proposed in [BDH11] carry over to the quantum setting. Namely, assuming existence of (classical) one-way functions that are resistant to efficient quantum inversion algorithms, there exists a quantum-secure signature scheme. We note that the scheme in [BDH11] is a promising (post-quantum) candidate to be implemented in practice and our result further justifies it. Actually, to obtain these results, we formalize a simple criteria, which is motivated by many classical proofs in the literature and is straightforward to check. This makes our lifting theorem easier to apply, and it should be useful elsewhere to prove quantum security of proposed post-quantum cryptographic schemes. Finally we demonstrate the generality of our framework by showing that several existing works (Full-Domain hash in the quantum random-oracle model [Zha12b] and the simple hybrid arguments framework in [HSS11]) can be reformulated under our unified framework. 1

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

A Note on Quantum Security for Post-Quantum Cryptography

Fang Song

Shor's quantum factoring algorithm and a few other efficient quantum algorithms break many classical crypto-systems. In response, people proposed post-quantum cryptography based on computational problems that are believed hard even for quantum computers. However, security of these schemes against \emph{quantum} attacks is elusive. This is because existing security analysis (almost) only deals with classical attackers and arguing security in the presence of quantum adversaries is challenging due to unique quantum features such as no-cloning. This work proposes a general framework to study which classical security proofs can be restored in the quantum setting. Basically, we split a security proof into (a sequence of) classical security reductions, and investigate what security reductions are "quantum-friendly". We characterize sufficient conditions such that a classical reduction can be "lifted" to the quantum setting. We then apply our lifting theorems to post-quantum signature schemes. We are able to show that the classical generic construction of hash-tree based signatures from one-way functions and and a more efficient variant proposed in~\cite{BDH11} carry over to the quantum setting. Namely, assuming existence of (classical) one-way functions that are resistant to efficient quantum inversion algorithms, there exists a quantum-secure signature scheme. We note that the scheme in~\cite{BDH11} is a promising (post-quantum) candidate to be implemented in practice and our result further justifies it. Finally we demonstrate the generality of our framework by showing that several existing works (Full-Domain hash in the quantum random-oracle model~\cite{Zha12ibe} and the simple hybrid arguments framework in~\cite{HSS11}) can be reformulated under our unified framework.

arXiv:1409.2187•Sep 8, 2014•4 citations

Randomized Oblivious Transfer for Secure Multiparty Computation in the Quantum Setting

Bruno Costa, Pedro Costa Branco, Manuel Goulão +2 more

Secure computation is a powerful cryptographic tool that encompasses the evaluation of any multivariate function with arbitrary inputs from mutually distrusting parties. The oblivious transfer primitive serves is a basic building block for the general task of secure multi-party computation. Therefore, analyzing the security in the universal composability framework becomes mandatory when dealing with multi-party computation protocols composed of oblivious transfer subroutines. Furthermore, since the required number of oblivious transfer instances scales with the size of the circuits, oblivious transfer remains as a bottleneck for large-scale multi-party computation implementations. Techniques that allow one to extend a small number of oblivious transfers into a larger one in an efficient way make use of the oblivious transfer variant called randomized oblivious transfer. In this work, we present randomized versions of two known oblivious transfer protocols, one quantum and another post-quantum with ring learning with an error assumption. We then prove their security in the quantum universal composability framework, in a common reference string model.

Entropy•Jul 31, 2021•12 citations

From Factoring to Lattices: Forging Post-Quantum Cryptographic Security

Revista, Zen, MATH, 10

The landscape of modern cryptography is fundamentally challenged by the advent of quantum computing. Current public-key cryptosystems, which form the bedrock of secure digital communication, rely on the computational hardness of problems such as integer factorization (RSA) and the discrete logarithm problem (ECC). However, Shor's algorithm, if implemented on a sufficiently powerful quantum computer, can efficiently break these schemes, rendering them insecure. This paper explores the critical transition from these classical number theory problems to lattice-based cryptography, presenting a comprehensive analysis of the motivations, theoretical underpinnings, and practical implications for forging post-quantum cryptographic security. We delve into the mathematical foundations of lattice problems, such as the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) and Learning With Errors (LWE), which are believed to resist known quantum algorithms. Through a thorough literature review, we trace the evolution of cryptographic thought, detailing the vulnerabilities of pre-quantum schemes and the emergence of lattice-based constructions as leading candidates for post-quantum standardization. The methodology outlines a comparative theoretical analysis of security, efficiency, and robustness against both classical and quantum attacks. Results demonstrate the compelling advantages of lattice-based schemes in terms of provable security reductions and resistance to quantum threats, albeit with considerations for increased key and ciphertext sizes. The discussion highlights the challenges and opportunities in the deployment and standardization of these new cryptographic primitives, emphasizing their critical role in securing future digital infrastructures. This work concludes that lattice-based cryptography offers a robust and theoretically sound pathway to establishing enduring security in a quantum-threatened world.

•Dec 3, 2025•0 citations

Post-Quantum Cryptography Using Lattices

Patchigulla Pooja, Jakka Ramya, Paras Nath Singh +4 more

The need and emergence of quantum computing under National Quantum Mission threatens the cyber-security of existing cryptographic protocols, especially public-key schemes built on integer factorization and discrete logarithms. Lattice-based cryptography has gained prominence as a robust candidate for post-quantum cryptography—offering security against quantum attacks while enabling efficient operations, parallelization, and novel functionalities. This paper analyzes the mathematical foundations of lattices, explores hardness assumptions underlying widely studied lattice problems, highlights prominent cryptographic constructions, analyzes performance trade-offs, and reviews standardization efforts. This paper concludes by identifying ongoing issues and future directions for lattice-based cryptographic systems in a quantum-secure digital world. The algorithm has been implemented in Python.

IEEE Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT)•Oct 24, 2025•0 citations

Improved Robustness and Versatility of Lattice-Based Cryptography

Huijing Gong

Current public key cryptosystems that are based on the hardness of integer factorization and discrete logarithm are insecure in the presence of large-scale quantum computers. Much effort has been devoted to replacing the quantum-insecure cryptosystems with newly developed "post-quantum" cryptosystem candidates, conjectured to be secure against quantum attack. Lattice-based cryptography has been widely recognized as a prominent candidate for practical post-quantum security.This dissertation improves the robustness and versatility of lattice-based cryptography through the following three contributions: 1. Chapter 3 introduces a constant-round protocol for unauthenticated group key exchange (i.e., with security against a passive eavesdropper). Group key exchange protocols allow a set of N parties to agree on a shared, secret key by communicating over a public network. Our protocol is based on the hardness of a lattice problem, which hence yields (plausible) post-quantum security. 2. In Chapter 4, we propose a framework for cryptanalysis of lattice-based schemes when certain types of information about the secret are leaked. Our framework generalizes the primal lattice reduction attack. The generalization allows for integrating the leaked information progressively before running a final lattice reduction step. Our framework can estimate the amount of security loss caused by the leaked information, and perform lattice reduction attacks with leaked information when computationally feasible. 3. Chapter 5 introduces an approach towards a ring analogue of the Leftover Hash Lemma (LHL). The LHL is a mathematical tool often used in the analysis of various lattice-based cryptosystems, as well as their leakage-resilient counterparts. However, it does not hold in the ring setting, which is typical for efficient cryptosystems. Lyubashevsky et al. (Eurocrypt '13) proved a "regularity lemma," which is used in the ring setting instead of the LHL; however, this applies only for centered, spherical Gaussian inputs, while the LHL applies when the input is drawn from any high min-entropy distribution. Our approach generalizes the "regularity lemma" of Lyubashevsky et al. to certain conditional distributions. A number of Ring-Learning with Errors based cryptosystems can achieve certain leakage resilience properties using our results.

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations
Because of the concise functionality of oblivious transfer (OT) protocols, they have been widely used as building blocks in secure multiparty computation and high-level protocols. The security of OT protocols built upon classical number theoretic problems, such as the discrete logarithm and factoring, however, is threatened as a result of the huge progress in quantum computing. Therefore, post-quantum cryptography is needed for protocols based on classical problems, and several proposals for post-quantum OT protocols exist. However, most post-quantum cryptosystems present their security proof only in the context of classical adversaries, not in the quantum setting. In this paper, we close this gap and prove the security of the lattice-based OT protocol proposed by Peikert et al. (CRYPTO, 2008), which is universally composably secure under the assumption of learning with errors hardness, in the quantum setting. We apply three general quantum security analysis frameworks. First, we apply the quantum lifting theorem proposed by Unruh (EUROCRYPT, 2010) to prove that the security of the lattice-based OT protocol can be lifted into the quantum world. Then, we apply two more security analysis frameworks specified for post-quantum cryptographic primitives, i.e., simple hybrid arguments (CRYPTO, 2011) and game-preserving reduction (PQCrypto, 2014).
Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm and a few other efficient quantum algorithms break many clas-sical crypto-systems. In response, people proposed post-quantum cryptography based on computational problems that are believed hard even for quantum computers. However, security of these schemes against quantum attacks is elusive. This is because existing security analysis (almost) only deals with classical attackers and arguing security in the presence of quantum adversaries is challenging due to unique quan-tum features such as no-cloning. This work proposes a general framework to study which classical security proofs can be restored in the quantum setting. Basically, we split a security proof into (a sequence of) classical security reductions, and investigate what security reductions are “quantum-friendly”. We characterize sufficient conditions such that a classical reduction can be “lifted ” to the quantum setting. We then apply our lifting theorems to post-quantum signature schemes. We are able to show that the classical generic construction of hash-tree based signatures from one-way functions and and a more efficient variant proposed in [BDH11] carry over to the quantum setting. Namely, assuming existence of (classical) one-way functions that are resistant to efficient quantum inversion algorithms, there exists a quantum-secure signature scheme. We note that the scheme in [BDH11] is a promising (post-quantum) candidate to be implemented in practice and our result further justifies it. Actually, to obtain these results, we formalize a simple criteria, which is motivated by many classical proofs in the literature and is straightforward to check. This makes our lifting theorem easier to apply, and it should be useful elsewhere to prove quantum security of proposed post-quantum cryptographic schemes. Finally we demonstrate the generality of our framework by showing that several existing works (Full-Domain hash in the quantum random-oracle model [Zha12b] and the simple hybrid arguments framework in [HSS11]) can be reformulated under our unified framework. 1
Shor's quantum factoring algorithm and a few other efficient quantum algorithms break many classical crypto-systems. In response, people proposed post-quantum cryptography based on computational problems that are believed hard even for quantum computers. However, security of these schemes against \emph{quantum} attacks is elusive. This is because existing security analysis (almost) only deals with classical attackers and arguing security in the presence of quantum adversaries is challenging due to unique quantum features such as no-cloning. This work proposes a general framework to study which classical security proofs can be restored in the quantum setting. Basically, we split a security proof into (a sequence of) classical security reductions, and investigate what security reductions are "quantum-friendly". We characterize sufficient conditions such that a classical reduction can be "lifted" to the quantum setting. We then apply our lifting theorems to post-quantum signature schemes. We are able to show that the classical generic construction of hash-tree based signatures from one-way functions and and a more efficient variant proposed in~\cite{BDH11} carry over to the quantum setting. Namely, assuming existence of (classical) one-way functions that are resistant to efficient quantum inversion algorithms, there exists a quantum-secure signature scheme. We note that the scheme in~\cite{BDH11} is a promising (post-quantum) candidate to be implemented in practice and our result further justifies it. Finally we demonstrate the generality of our framework by showing that several existing works (Full-Domain hash in the quantum random-oracle model~\cite{Zha12ibe} and the simple hybrid arguments framework in~\cite{HSS11}) can be reformulated under our unified framework.
Secure computation is a powerful cryptographic tool that encompasses the evaluation of any multivariate function with arbitrary inputs from mutually distrusting parties. The oblivious transfer primitive serves is a basic building block for the general task of secure multi-party computation. Therefore, analyzing the security in the universal composability framework becomes mandatory when dealing with multi-party computation protocols composed of oblivious transfer subroutines. Furthermore, since the required number of oblivious transfer instances scales with the size of the circuits, oblivious transfer remains as a bottleneck for large-scale multi-party computation implementations. Techniques that allow one to extend a small number of oblivious transfers into a larger one in an efficient way make use of the oblivious transfer variant called randomized oblivious transfer. In this work, we present randomized versions of two known oblivious transfer protocols, one quantum and another post-quantum with ring learning with an error assumption. We then prove their security in the quantum universal composability framework, in a common reference string model.
The landscape of modern cryptography is fundamentally challenged by the advent of quantum computing. Current public-key cryptosystems, which form the bedrock of secure digital communication, rely on the computational hardness of problems such as integer factorization (RSA) and the discrete logarithm problem (ECC). However, Shor's algorithm, if implemented on a sufficiently powerful quantum computer, can efficiently break these schemes, rendering them insecure. This paper explores the critical transition from these classical number theory problems to lattice-based cryptography, presenting a comprehensive analysis of the motivations, theoretical underpinnings, and practical implications for forging post-quantum cryptographic security. We delve into the mathematical foundations of lattice problems, such as the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) and Learning With Errors (LWE), which are believed to resist known quantum algorithms. Through a thorough literature review, we trace the evolution of cryptographic thought, detailing the vulnerabilities of pre-quantum schemes and the emergence of lattice-based constructions as leading candidates for post-quantum standardization. The methodology outlines a comparative theoretical analysis of security, efficiency, and robustness against both classical and quantum attacks. Results demonstrate the compelling advantages of lattice-based schemes in terms of provable security reductions and resistance to quantum threats, albeit with considerations for increased key and ciphertext sizes. The discussion highlights the challenges and opportunities in the deployment and standardization of these new cryptographic primitives, emphasizing their critical role in securing future digital infrastructures. This work concludes that lattice-based cryptography offers a robust and theoretically sound pathway to establishing enduring security in a quantum-threatened world.
The need and emergence of quantum computing under National Quantum Mission threatens the cyber-security of existing cryptographic protocols, especially public-key schemes built on integer factorization and discrete logarithms. Lattice-based cryptography has gained prominence as a robust candidate for post-quantum cryptography—offering security against quantum attacks while enabling efficient operations, parallelization, and novel functionalities. This paper analyzes the mathematical foundations of lattices, explores hardness assumptions underlying widely studied lattice problems, highlights prominent cryptographic constructions, analyzes performance trade-offs, and reviews standardization efforts. This paper concludes by identifying ongoing issues and future directions for lattice-based cryptographic systems in a quantum-secure digital world. The algorithm has been implemented in Python.
Current public key cryptosystems that are based on the hardness of integer factorization and discrete logarithm are insecure in the presence of large-scale quantum computers. Much effort has been devoted to replacing the quantum-insecure cryptosystems with newly developed "post-quantum" cryptosystem candidates, conjectured to be secure against quantum attack. Lattice-based cryptography has been widely recognized as a prominent candidate for practical post-quantum security.This dissertation improves the robustness and versatility of lattice-based cryptography through the following three contributions: 1. Chapter 3 introduces a constant-round protocol for unauthenticated group key exchange (i.e., with security against a passive eavesdropper). Group key exchange protocols allow a set of N parties to agree on a shared, secret key by communicating over a public network. Our protocol is based on the hardness of a lattice problem, which hence yields (plausible) post-quantum security. 2. In Chapter 4, we propose a framework for cryptanalysis of lattice-based schemes when certain types of information about the secret are leaked. Our framework generalizes the primal lattice reduction attack. The generalization allows for integrating the leaked information progressively before running a final lattice reduction step. Our framework can estimate the amount of security loss caused by the leaked information, and perform lattice reduction attacks with leaked information when computationally feasible. 3. Chapter 5 introduces an approach towards a ring analogue of the Leftover Hash Lemma (LHL). The LHL is a mathematical tool often used in the analysis of various lattice-based cryptosystems, as well as their leakage-resilient counterparts. However, it does not hold in the ring setting, which is typical for efficient cryptosystems. Lyubashevsky et al. (Eurocrypt '13) proved a "regularity lemma," which is used in the ring setting instead of the LHL; however, this applies only for centered, spherical Gaussian inputs, while the LHL applies when the input is drawn from any high min-entropy distribution. Our approach generalizes the "regularity lemma" of Lyubashevsky et al. to certain conditional distributions. A number of Ring-Learning with Errors based cryptosystems can achieve certain leakage resilience properties using our results.