The Universe, Life and Everything...: Dialogues on our Changing Understanding of Reality

Sarah Durston, Ton Baggerman

Published Oct 9, 2017• 4 citations

Abstract

Our current understanding of our world is nearly 350 years old. It stems from the ideas of Descartes and Newton and has brought us many great things, including modern science and increases in wealth, health and everyday living standards. Furthermore, it is so ingrained in our daily lives that we have forgotten it is a paradigm, not a fact. There are, however, some problems with it. First, there is no satisfactory explanation for why we have consciousness and experience meaning in our lives. Second, modern-day physics tells us that observations depend on characteristics of the observer at the large, cosmic, and small, subatomic scales. Third, ongoing humanitarian and environmental crises show us that our world is vastly interconnected. Our understanding of reality is expanding to incorporate these issues. In The Universe, Life and Everything . . . Dialogues on our Changing Understanding of Reality, some of the scholars at the forefront of this change, from the fields of physics, psychology, and social sciences, discuss the direction it is taking and its urgency

DOI: 10.1515/9789048539055

Related papers

The Universe, Life and Everything...

Sarah Durston, Ton Baggerman

Routledge eBooksMay 4, 202110 citations

Is reality what we make it?

Sarah Durston, Ton Baggerman

So, by now we have established what our reigning paradigm is and heard why it is time to renew it. We have discussed that there are aspects of our reality that are simply not in keeping with the way we view the world: there is no convincing scientific explanation for consciousness; we do not understand how brain function can result in the experience of feeling like somebody. Furthermore, modern-day physics is telling us our world looks very different at the subatomic scale, where quantum systems have both particle and wave-like properties and only take on one or the other when they are measured. We need a new paradigm that can incorporate these as yet poorly understood aspects of our reality.

Routledge eBooksOct 1, 20250 citations

The New Vision of Reality: Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism

Fritjof Capra

I am a physicist, and my main interest over the past fifteen years has been in the dramatic change of concepts and ideas that has occurred in physics during the first three decades of the century. These are still being elaborated in our current theories of matter. The new concepts in physics have brought about a profound change in our world view: from the mechanistic world view of Descartes and Newton to a holistic and

Jan 1, 20161 citation

Why do we need to expand our understanding of reality?

Sarah Durston, Ton Baggerman

Why would we need a new world view? The only possible reason is if the old one is failing, and let’s be realistic: our classic, Newtonian, deterministic view of reality has been hugely successful. It has brought us modern science. It brought us the industrial revolution. It has revolutionised technology, medicine, agriculture, all aspects of our world. Why would we critique it? First of all, our thinking is so rooted in this paradigm that we have forgotten that it is a paradigm, a way of viewing the world, and not fact. As such, there may be other, perhaps complementary, ways to view the world that are equally useful and that may extend our understanding beyond what we can achieve using our conventional view. Second, there are areas in which our paradigm is beginning to falter, aspects of our reality that it does not fit. Yet, we are very attached to our world view, so we do not always want to recognise that it may be flagging. This chapter outlines three areas where our paradigm is reaching its limits to explain why we need to expand it. Furthermore, it gives some examples of how attached people are to thinking in terms of the classical paradigm.

Routledge eBooksOct 1, 20250 citations

Quantum consciousness and life

Alexander E. Wendt

Introduction We saw in Part I that in addition to explaining consciousness there is another hard problem for the modern scientific worldview – understanding what quantum physics is telling us about reality. And if anything this one is harder. In philosophy of mind there is at least consensus enough for an orthodox position to exist (materialism), and a widespread expectation that it will be vindicated by future neuroscience. By contrast, in philosophy of physics all sides understand that quantum theory is compatible with a variety of metaphysical interpretations, and have little hope that new empirical discoveries will settle the matter. But both problems are “hard” in the sense that, despite tremendous intellectual effort over many decades, no clear progress has been made toward solving them. The basic idea of quantum consciousness theory is that bringing the two problems into contact may be the key to solving both (though I will be addressing only the mind–body problem in what follows). That this could be a novel idea attests to the fact that their philosophical discussions have evolved quite separately. While philosophers of physics have long been interested in the role of consciousness in the measurement process, they have engaged little with the mind–body problem per se; and philosophers of mind have been almost unanimous in dismissing the suggestion that consciousness has anything interesting to do with quantum physics. Social scientists might echo such skepticism, wondering how adding the problem of interpreting quantum theory to the problem of consciousness will help them . Besides piling up jargon and arcane debates, in moving to the sub-atomic level we are now even farther removed from the human world, and seemingly poised to engage in the most vulgar reductionism. Yet, naïvely one might expect the two problems to be related, for two reasons. The first is the intriguing analogies mentioned in Chapter 1 between the mental and quantum domains.

Cambridge University Press eBooksApr 20, 20150 citations

The Quantum Zoo: A Tourist's Guide to the Neverending Universe

Marcus Chown

The two towering achievements of modern physics are quantum theory and Einstein's general theory of relativity. Together, they explain virtually everything about the world we live in. But, almost a century after their advent, most people haven&#39t the slightest clue what either is about. Did you know that there's so much empty space inside matter that the entire human race could be squeezed into the volume of a sugar cube? Or that you grow old more quickly on the top floor of a building than on the ground floor? And did you realize that 1% of the static on a TV tuned between stations is the relic of the Big Bang? These and many other remarkable facts about the world are direct consequences of quantum physics and relativity. Quantum theory has literally made the modern world possible. Not only has it given us lasers, computers, and nuclear reactors, but it has provided an explanation of why the sun shines and why the ground beneath our feet is solid. Despite this, however, quantum theory and relativity remain a patchwork of fragmented ideas, vaguely understood at best and often utterly mysterious. They have even gained a reputation of being beyond the understanding of the average person. Author Marcus Chown emphatically disagrees. As Einstein himself said, Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone. If you think that the marvels of modern physics have passed you by, it is not too late. In Chown's capable hands, quantum physics and relativity are not only painless but downright fun. So sit back, relax, and get comfortable as an adept and experienced science communicator brings you quickly up to speed on some of the greatest ideas in the history of human thought.

Mar 15, 20061 citation