The nonlocal aspect of entanglement is often considered to show the solid distinguishability of quantum weirdness from classical theory. In this paper, this peculiar facet of entanglement is discussed in light of the observer-dependent subjective model, in which vacuum is filled with the quantum negative sea of the observer's reference frame. The correlation of observers' choices with respect to the observed, as opposed to the ordinary correlation of state vectors with respect to the choice of observables in the observer-independent objective scheme, will be considered. In particular, we will argue that, unlike in the objective model, it is the observers' conscious negative sea that interact and share with each other. The presented discussion is consistent with the previous proposal of continuous or infinite negative sea as an innate aspect of universal grammar shared among observers.
The nonlocal aspect of entanglement is often considered to show the solid distinguishability of quantum weirdness from classical theory. In this paper, this peculiar facet of entanglement is discussed in light of the observer-dependent subjective model, in which vacuum is filled with the quantum negative sea of the observer's reference frame. The correlation of observers' choices with respect to the observed, as opposed to the ordinary correlation of state vectors with respect to the choice of observables in the observer-independent objective scheme, will be considered. In particular, we will argue that, unlike in the objective model, it is the observers' conscious negative sea that interact and share with each other. The presented discussion is consistent with the previous proposal of continuous or infinite negative sea as an innate aspect of universal grammar shared among observers.
In this paper, we discuss that an observable-based single-system Copenhagen and entanglement-based two-system von Neumann measurement protocols in quantum theory can be made equivalent by considering the second part of the two-system scheme to be a Dirac-type negative sea filling up the first system. Based on this equivalence, and by considering the universe as a computational process, the choice of the apparatus state in the two-system protocol can be identified with the choice of the observable in the single-system scheme as negative sea filling up the observable universe. In particular, the measuring party's state is considered to be evolving backwards in time to the big bang as a nondeterministic computational process, which chooses the acceptable path as a time-reversal process of irreversible computation. The suggested model proposes that the prepared microstate of the universe, or reality, corresponds to the observer's choice, therefore, subjective reality. Thus, this effectively provides a specific description of the subjective universe model previously proposed, which is based on the symmetry breakdown between the Schrodinger and the Heisenberg pictures of quantum theory.
Based on the equivalence of the two different types of measurement protocols and the asymmetry between the Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures, it has been previously proposed that negative sea fills the universe as a nondeterministic computation - a time-reversal process of the irreversible computations presented since the big bang. The goal of this paper is to extend the proposed subjective universe model, i.e., the universe as a quantum measurement: Motivated by the relationship between quantum theory and classical probability theory with continuity, it is argued that the frame of reference of the observer may be identified with classical probability theory where its choice, along with big bang singularity, should correspond to the quantum observable. That is, the physical version of singularity resolution corresponds to the case, where big bang singularity is equivalent to the continuity of the negative sea, or aether, filling the universe as a frame of reference of the observer. Moreover, based on the holographic principle, we identify the choice of the observer with the degrees of freedom proportional to the Planck area on the horizon. We also discuss that the continuity or infinity present in every formal language of choice acceptable in nondeterministic computation may be associated with the universal grammar proposed by Chomsky in linguistics.
In this paper, we discuss that an observable-based single-system Copenhagen and entanglement-based two-system von Neumann measurement protocols in quantum theory can be made equivalent by considering the second part of the two-system scheme to be a Dirac-type negative sea filling up the first system. Based on this equivalence, and by considering the universe as a computational process, the choice of the apparatus state in the two-system protocol can be identified with the choice of the observable in the single-system scheme as negative sea filling up the observable universe. In particular, the measuring party's state is considered to be evolving backwards in time to the big bang as a nondeterministic computational process, which chooses the acceptable path as a time-reversal process of irreversible computation. The suggested model proposes that the prepared microstate of the universe, or reality, corresponds to the observer's choice, therefore, subjective reality. Thus, this effectively provides a specific description of the subjective universe model previously proposed, which is based on the symmetry breakdown between the Schrodinger and the Heisenberg pictures of quantum theory.
Based on the equivalence of the two different types of measurement protocols and the asymmetry between the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures, it has been previously proposed that negative sea fills the universe as a nondeterministic computation - a time-reversal process of the irreversible computations presented since the big bang. The goal of this paper is to extend the proposed subjective universe model, i.e., the universe as a quantum measurement: Motivated by the relationship between quantum theory and classical probability theory with continuity, it is argued that the frame of reference of the observer may be identified with classical probability theory where its choice, along with big bang singularity, should correspond to the quantum observable. That is, the physical version of singularity resolution corresponds to the case, where big bang singularity is equivalent to the continuity of the negative sea, or aether, filling the universe as a frame of reference of the observer. Moreover, based on the holographic principle, we identify the choice of the observer with the degrees of freedom proportional to the Planck area on the horizon. We also discuss that the continuity or infinity present in every formal language of choice acceptable in nondeterministic computation may be associated with the universal grammar proposed by Chomsky in linguistics.
Quantum theory reveals astonishing and counterintuitive phenomena not found in classical physics, such as wave-particle duality, where entities like electrons and photons exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behaviors. In this paper, we leverage advancements in quantum information science to gain new insights into this phenomenon. We specifically examine negative conditional entropy in quantum entanglement, where the selection of the measurement basis appears to ripple backward in time, akin to Dirac's model of an infinite sea of negative energy states filled with electrons, where holes in this sea appear as positrons. We propose that an observer's knowledge of the measurement choice, analogous to a hole in the negative information sea, corresponds to the wave aspect of the system, while the classical outcome aligns with its particle nature. This exploration of the relationship between microscopic quantum phenomena and macroscopic observations offers new perspectives on the mind-matter duality.
Quantum entanglement remains one of the most conceptually unresolved phenomena in modern physics. Although quantum mechanics predicts experimental outcomes with exceptional accuracy, the ontological interpretation of nonlocal correlations remains open to debate. This paper presents a conceptual relational interpretation proposal in which entangled systems originate from a unified invariant informational structure. Under this framework, measurement is not treated as passive observation of pre-existing classical values, but as a contextual projection process interacting with an underlying shared state. The proposal suggests that entangled particles may remain contextual projections of a deeper unified relational structure rather than fully independent separated systems exchanging information after separation. To clarify the concept, the paper introduces a software architecture analogy in which multiple observable variants may share the same immutable core state while generating contextual outputs depending on interaction and input configuration. Under this interpretation, correlated quantum outcomes may emerge from shared invariant structure rather than post-separation communication. The paper also introduces a complementary Color Sphere analogy representing a unified quantum state containing structured relational information. Different measurement configurations generate distinct projections of the same underlying structure while preserving internal relational consistency. This proposal does not claim experimental verification or a complete mathematical replacement for quantum mechanics. Instead, it offers a conceptual and philosophical framework intended to motivate future mathematical, informational, or relational approaches toward understanding entanglement, measurement, and structural consistency in physical reality.