Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SpringerBriefs in history of science and technology

The Fundamental Differences Between Classical and Quantum Physics

H. Capellmann

Published Jan 1, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-61884-5_2

Related papers

A Measure of Classicality

James B. Hartle, Murray Gell‐Mann

A striking feature of our fundamentally indeterministic quantum universe is its quasiclassical realm -- the wide range of time place and scale in which the deterministic laws of classical physics hold. Our quasiclassical realmis an emergent feature of the fundamental theories of our universe's quantum state and dynamics. There are many types of quasiclassical realms our Universe could exhibit characterized by different variables, different levels of coarse-graining, different locations in spacetime, different classical physics, and different levels of classicality.We propose a measure of classicality for quasiclassical realms, We speculate on the observable consequences of different levels of classicality especially for information gathering and utilizing systems (IGUSes) such ourselves as observers of the Universe.

arXiv:2104.14465•Apr 28, 2021•0 citations

Relationship Between Classical and Quantum Physics

Skender, Ahmetaj, Kabashi +3 more

数学和系统科学：英文版•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Measurement Quantization Unites Classical and Quantum Physics

Jody A. Geiger

Unifying quantum and classical physics has proved difficult as their postulates are conflicting. Using the notion of counts of the fundamental measures—length, mass, and time—a unifying description is resolved. A theoretical framework is presented in a set of postulates by which a conversion between expressions from quantum and classical physics can be made. Conversions of well-known expressions from different areas of physics (quantum physics, gravitation, optics and cosmology) exemplify the approach and mathematical procedures. The postulated integer counts of fundamental measures change our understanding of length, suggesting that our current understanding of reality is distorted.

Journal of High Energy Physics Gravitation and Cosmology•Jan 1, 2018•7 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Classical Physics

N. Rosen

•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Introduction: Three Worlds

Gary E. Bowman

This introductory chapter outlines the differences between classical physics and quantum physics by positing three imaginary worlds. World 1 is governed by the laws of classical Newtonian mechanics, World 2 by classical field physics, and World 3 by quantum physics. The point is that classical physics deals with well-defined, continuously-existing physical quantities, including trajectories, while quantum physics is fundamentally about physical quantities defined in terms of probability functions.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Nov 1, 2007•0 citations

From classical to quantum physics

E.L. Albuquerque

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations
A striking feature of our fundamentally indeterministic quantum universe is its quasiclassical realm -- the wide range of time place and scale in which the deterministic laws of classical physics hold. Our quasiclassical realmis an emergent feature of the fundamental theories of our universe's quantum state and dynamics. There are many types of quasiclassical realms our Universe could exhibit characterized by different variables, different levels of coarse-graining, different locations in spacetime, different classical physics, and different levels of classicality.We propose a measure of classicality for quasiclassical realms, We speculate on the observable consequences of different levels of classicality especially for information gathering and utilizing systems (IGUSes) such ourselves as observers of the Universe.
Unifying quantum and classical physics has proved difficult as their postulates are conflicting. Using the notion of counts of the fundamental measures—length, mass, and time—a unifying description is resolved. A theoretical framework is presented in a set of postulates by which a conversion between expressions from quantum and classical physics can be made. Conversions of well-known expressions from different areas of physics (quantum physics, gravitation, optics and cosmology) exemplify the approach and mathematical procedures. The postulated integer counts of fundamental measures change our understanding of length, suggesting that our current understanding of reality is distorted.
This introductory chapter outlines the differences between classical physics and quantum physics by positing three imaginary worlds. World 1 is governed by the laws of classical Newtonian mechanics, World 2 by classical field physics, and World 3 by quantum physics. The point is that classical physics deals with well-defined, continuously-existing physical quantities, including trajectories, while quantum physics is fundamentally about physical quantities defined in terms of probability functions.