Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Non-Local Translationally Invariant Nuclear Density

Michael Gennari, Angelo Calci, Matteo Vorabbi, P. Navrátil

Published Oct 26, 2017• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Transformation from the usual nuclear, shell model to the translationally invariant shell model.

S H Al-SAMARAE

Acta Physica Polonica B•Jan 1, 1977•0 citations

Nuclear Shell Model and Level Density

Vladimir Zelevinsky, Sofia Karampagia

Springer proceedings in physics•Sep 10, 2020•1 citation

The One-Body and Two-Body Density Matrices of Finite Nuclei and Center-of-Mass Correlations

Alexandr Victorovich Shebeko, P. Papakonstantinou, E. Mavrommatis

A method is presented for the calculation of the one-body and two-body density matrices and their Fourier transforms in momentum space, that is consistent with the requirement for translational invariance, in the case of a nucleus (a finite self-bound system). We restore translational invariance by using the so-called fixed center-of-mass approximation for constructing an intrinsic nuclear ground state wavefunction by starting from a non-translationally invariant wavefunction and applying a projection prescription. We discuss results for the one-body and two-body momentum distributions of the 4He nucleus calculated with the Slater determinant of the harmonic oscillator orbitals, as the initial non-translationally invariant wavefunction. Effects of such an inclusion of CM correlations are found to be quite important in the momentum distributions.

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

On a translationally invariant nuclear single particle picture

W. Glöckle, Hiroyuki Kamada, J. Golak

If one assumes a translationally invariant motion of the nucleons relative to the c. m. position in single particle mean fields a correlated single particle picture of the nuclear wave function emerges. A single particle product ansatz leads for that Hamiltonian to nonlinear equations for the single particle wave functions. In contrast to a standard not translationally invariant shell model picture those single particle s-, p- etc states are coupled. The strength of the resulting coupling is an open question. The Schroedinger equation for that Hamiltonian can be solved by few- and many -body techniques, which will allow to check the validity or non-validity of a single particle product ansatz. Realistic nuclear wave functions exhibit repulsive 2-body short range correlations. Therefore a translationally invariant single particle picture -- if useful at all -- can only be expected beyond those ranges. Since exact A = 3 and 4 nucleon ground state wave functions and beyond based on modern nuclear forces are available, the translationally invariant shell model picture can be optimized by an adjustment to the exact wave function and its validity or non-validity decided.

arXiv:1106.2022•Jun 10, 2011•1 citation

A simple approximation for the nuclear density matrix

X. Campi, A. Bouyssy

Physics Letters B•Feb 1, 1978•182 citations

The One-Body and Two-Body Density Matrices of Finite Nuclei and Center-of-Mass Correlations

A. Shebeko

A method is presented for the calculation of the one‐body (1DM) and two‐body (2DM) density matrices and their Fourier transforms in momentum space, that is consistent with the requirement for translational invariance (TI), in the case of a nucleus (a finite self‐bound system). We restore TI by using the so‐called fixed center‐of‐mass (CM) approximation for constructing an intrinsic nuclear ground state wavefunction (WF) by starting from a non‐translationally invariant (nTI) WF and applying a projection prescription. We discuss results for the one‐body (OBMD) and two‐body (TBMD) momentum distributions of the 4He nucleus calculated with the Slater determinant of the harmonic oscillator (HO) orbitals, as the initial nTI WF. Effects of such an inclusion of CM correlations are found to be quite important in the momentum distributions.

arXiv:nucl-th/0512054•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations
A method is presented for the calculation of the one-body and two-body density matrices and their Fourier transforms in momentum space, that is consistent with the requirement for translational invariance, in the case of a nucleus (a finite self-bound system). We restore translational invariance by using the so-called fixed center-of-mass approximation for constructing an intrinsic nuclear ground state wavefunction by starting from a non-translationally invariant wavefunction and applying a projection prescription. We discuss results for the one-body and two-body momentum distributions of the 4He nucleus calculated with the Slater determinant of the harmonic oscillator orbitals, as the initial non-translationally invariant wavefunction. Effects of such an inclusion of CM correlations are found to be quite important in the momentum distributions.
If one assumes a translationally invariant motion of the nucleons relative to the c. m. position in single particle mean fields a correlated single particle picture of the nuclear wave function emerges. A single particle product ansatz leads for that Hamiltonian to nonlinear equations for the single particle wave functions. In contrast to a standard not translationally invariant shell model picture those single particle s-, p- etc states are coupled. The strength of the resulting coupling is an open question. The Schroedinger equation for that Hamiltonian can be solved by few- and many -body techniques, which will allow to check the validity or non-validity of a single particle product ansatz. Realistic nuclear wave functions exhibit repulsive 2-body short range correlations. Therefore a translationally invariant single particle picture -- if useful at all -- can only be expected beyond those ranges. Since exact A = 3 and 4 nucleon ground state wave functions and beyond based on modern nuclear forces are available, the translationally invariant shell model picture can be optimized by an adjustment to the exact wave function and its validity or non-validity decided.
A method is presented for the calculation of the one‐body (1DM) and two‐body (2DM) density matrices and their Fourier transforms in momentum space, that is consistent with the requirement for translational invariance (TI), in the case of a nucleus (a finite self‐bound system). We restore TI by using the so‐called fixed center‐of‐mass (CM) approximation for constructing an intrinsic nuclear ground state wavefunction (WF) by starting from a non‐translationally invariant (nTI) WF and applying a projection prescription. We discuss results for the one‐body (OBMD) and two‐body (TBMD) momentum distributions of the 4He nucleus calculated with the Slater determinant of the harmonic oscillator (HO) orbitals, as the initial nTI WF. Effects of such an inclusion of CM correlations are found to be quite important in the momentum distributions.