The description of a quantum system follows a fundamentally different paradigm to that of a classical system, leading to unique yet counter-intuitive properties. In this thesis we consider some of these unique properties, here termed simply the quantum. We focus on understanding some important types of the quantum: quantum coherence and quantum correlations, as well as quantum entanglement as an important subclass of quantum correlations. Our objective is to investigate how to quantify the quantum, what it can be used for, and how it can be preserved in the adverse presence of noise. These findings help to clarify the frontier between quantum and classical systems, a crucial endeavour for understanding the applications and advantageous features of the quantum world.
The description of a quantum system follows a fundamentally different paradigm to that of a classical system, leading to unique yet counter-intuitive properties. In this thesis we consider some of these unique properties, here termed simply the quantum. We focus on understanding some important types of the quantum: quantum coherence and quantum correlations, as well as quantum entanglement as an important subclass of quantum correlations. Our objective is to investigate how to quantify the quantum, what it can be used for, and how it can be preserved in the adverse presence of noise. These findings help to clarify the frontier between quantum and classical systems, a crucial endeavour for understanding the applications and advantageous features of the quantum world.
Abstract Quantum information theory is built upon the realisation that quantum resources like coherence and entanglement can be exploited for novel or enhanced ways of transmitting and manipulating information, such as quantum cryptography, teleportation, and quantum computing. We now know that there is potentially much more than entanglement behind the power of quantum information processing. There exist more general forms of non-classical correlations, stemming from fundamental principles such as the necessary disturbance induced by a local measurement, or the persistence of quantum coherence in all possible local bases. These signatures can be identified and are resilient in almost all quantum states, and have been linked to the enhanced performance of certain quantum protocols over classical ones in noisy conditions. Their presence represents, among other things, one of the most essential manifestations of quantumness in cooperative systems, from the subatomic to the macroscopic domain. In this work we give an overview of the current quest for a proper understanding and characterisation of the frontier between classical and quantum correlations (QCs) in composite states. We focus on various approaches to define and quantify general QCs, based on different yet interlinked physical perspectives, and comment on the operational significance of the ensuing measures for quantum technology tasks such as information encoding, distribution, discrimination and metrology. We then provide a broader outlook of a few applications in which quantumness beyond entanglement looks fit to play a key role.
Although the foundations of quantum and classical physics are much different, it is often difficult to pinpoint which features of a particular system are intrinsically "quantum". Perhapse, the most clear-cut distinction between "classical" and "quantum" can be made for systems composed of many particles when the properties of the ensemble are determined by the correlations between the constituents. The issue of grasping the nature of entanglement (i.e. quantum correlations) lies in its formal, discriminative definition: "if state is not classical then it is entangled". A possible remedy would be to approach the problem from the utilitarian point of view. The idea is that certain tasks can be performed better when entangled states are used instead of states that are only classically correlated. An example of such task is an entanglement-enhanced interferometer utilizing ensembles of ultra-cold atoms. This line of reasoning leads to the concept of classification of entanglement by the degree of usefulness and allows to relate it to certain well-defined physical properties of the state. The aim of this work is to formalize this abstraction and build upon it an intuitive picture which can help us understand what the entanglement is.
Theory and experiment have not fully resolved the apparent dichotomy , which has agonized physics for the past eighty years: on the one hand, the description of microsystems by quantum mechanics and, on the other, the description of macrosystems by classical dynamics or statistical mechanics. Derivations of the time-irreversible Liouville equation for an open quantum system, based on projecting out its environment, have narrowed the gap between the quantum and classical descriptions. Yet our `classical' intuition continues to be confronted by quantum-mechanical results like the Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen paradox that challenges the classical notion of locality, or the quantum Zeno effect which suggests that the isolation of a system is not the only way to preserve its quantum state. There are two key concepts in any discussion of such issues. The first, which is responsible for the most salient nonclassical properties, is entanglement , that is partial or complete correlation or, more generally, inseparability of the elements comprising a quantum ensemble . Even after their interaction has ceased, this inseparability, originating from their past interaction, can affect the state of one element when another element is subject to a nonunitary action, such as its measurement, tracing- out, or thermalization. The second key concept is decoherence of open quantum systems, which is the consequence of their entanglement with their environment, a `meter' or a thermal `reservoir', followed by the tracing-out of the latter. Despite new insights into entanglement and decoherence, there are still no complete, unequivocal answers to the fundamental questions of the transition from quantal to classical behaviour: how do irreversibility and classicality emerge from unitarity as systems and their environments become increasingly complex ? At what stage does system--meter entanglement give rise to a classical readout of the meter? Is there an upper limit on the size or complexity of systems displaying entanglement? Major developments have opened new vistas into controlled entanglement , which is the resource of quantum information processing. However, these developments have mainly focused on ensembles of simple two- and three-level systems that are thoroughly isolated from their environments. Treatments of coherence in quantum computing have mostly assumed that only a single or a few the elements of the quantum ensemble may simultaneously undergo an uncontrolled intervention---a quantum error. Decoherence-control protocols for more general types of errors are still incomplete. In order to resolve the outstanding issues of the quantum--classical transition, and study the control of entanglement and decoherence without the foregoing restrictions, we must venture into the domain of Quantum Complex Systems (QUACS), either consisting of a large number of inseparable elements or having many coupled degrees of freedom. Our conviction is that fundamental understanding and manipulation of entanglement within QUACS or their entanglement with the environment or a meter, call for the creation of a new conceptual framework or paradigm, that would encompass phenomena common to cold atoms in laser fields, large molecules, Josephson junctions, quantum gases and solids, with the view of employing these systems for quantum information processing and computing. Progress within this paradigm should allow us to answer the questions: does entanglement play an essential role in the evolution of large collections of complex systems? What are the size and complexity limits of systems and ensembles still controllable by an external intervention? What are the most appropriate decoherence protection schemes and control algorithms? This special issue addresses the challenge of understanding in depth and manipulating the basic quantum properties of optical, atomic, molecular and condensed-matter QUACS, and large ensembles thereof. In view of the interdisciplinary character of this issue, we find it expedient to look at the presented articles not only according to the physical objects they describe, but also from a unifying standpoint. Several unifying themes may be discerned: memory effects in dephasing and relaxation; protection of quantum information by its distribution throughout the ensemble; control of decoherence and entanglement by time-dependent interventions or measurements; manifestations of entanglement in scattering off statistical ensembles; measurment-induced dynamics. The concerted discussion of the topics outlined above should help us advance the new paradigm that addresses our abilities to diagnose and manipulate the entangled states of complex quantum objects and their robustness against decoherence. These abilities are required for quantum information (QI) applications in matter--wave interferometry in molecular, semiconducting or superconducting systems. On the fundamental level, this book may help establish the notion of dynamical information exchange between quantum systems and chart in detail the route from unitarity to classicality. Further developments within the outlined paradigm should yield novel, advantageous QI processing schemes and high-sensitivity interferometers, owing to decoherence suppression and effective control of many degrees of freedom. In the long run, these strategies may prove to be the first step towards the (hitherto unattempted) use of entanglement in nanotechnology, metrology and chemistry, with potentially remarkable novel applications.
One of the best signatures of nonclassicality in a quantum system is the existence of correlations that have no classical counterpart. Different methods for quantifying the quantum and classical parts of correlations are among the more actively studied topics of quantum-information theory over the past decade. Entanglement is the most prominent of these correlations, but in many cases unentangled states exhibit nonclassical behavior too. Thus distinguishing quantum correlations other than entanglement provides a better division between the quantum and classical worlds, especially when considering mixed states. Here different notions of classical and quantum correlations quantified by quantum discord and other related measures are reviewed. In the first half, the mathematical properties of the measures of quantum correlations are reviewed, related to each other, and the classical-quantum division that is common among them is discussed. In the second half, it is shown that the measures identify and quantify the deviation from classicality in various quantum-information-processing tasks, quantum thermodynamics, open-system dynamics, and many-body physics. It is shown that in many cases quantum correlations indicate an advantage of quantum methods over classical ones.
Quantum mechanics dramatically revolutionized our understanding of nature, challenged traditional information theory, and led to significant technological advancements. Two of the most counterintuitive features of quantum mechanics are quantum nonlocality and quantum contextuality. These features rule out hidden-variable models that attempt to explain quantum phenomena based on classical intuition. Quantum non-locality, first revealed by Bell's theorem in 1964, rules out local hidden-variable (LHV) models, originating from the famous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Meanwhile, quantum contextuality, originally pinpointed by the Kochen-Specker (KS) theorem in 1967, focuses on single-system correlations rather than between space-like separated systems, demonstrating quantum mechanics is incompatible with non-contextual hidden-variable (NCHV) models. Quantum correlations are crucial in several applications, both in computing and communication tasks. They also enable the strongest form of cryptographic security through the device-independent (DI) paradigm, where devices are treated as black-boxes, and could even be supplied by potentially malicious adversaries. The semi-device-independent (SDI) paradigm offers a more practical solution by balancing security and feasibility, allowing for some assumptions about devices. Since different DI and SDI applications require specific properties, this thesis focuses on designing optimal quantum correlations for these applications. DI randomness amplification (DIRA) is an important task in DI information processing, that converts a weak, biased seed into a fully random one. Quantum correlations on the boundary of the no-signaling set are necessary for this task. We introduce a class of almost-quantum Bell inequalities and develop a tilted version of the celebrated Hardy’s paradox showing corresponding quantum correlations enhance the robustness and efficiency in state-of-the-art DIRA protocols. Another direction pursued in the thesis is the study of self-testing, a DI approach to certify the state and measurements of quantum systems in a unique manner. We investigated three families of quantum correlations, the tilted Hardy tests, which we prove self-test any two-qubit pure entangled state, except the maximally-entangled one, the α-CHSH inequalities, where we prove robust self-test of the singlet and corresponding measurements, and weighted-Braunstein-Caves chained inequalities, which we prove delineate a boundary for the quantum correlation set, extending beyond the well-known Tsirelson-Landau-Masanes boundary. A third main direction explored in the thesis is the efficient construction of novel state-dependent and state-independent contextuality proof. We provide an optimal and experiment-friendly toolbox for various contextuality-based applications, including demonstrating entanglement-assisted advantages in zero-error communication, separating binary-outcome no-signaling models from quantum theory, and achieving optimal randomness rate in the SDI paradigm. We also discuss and address issues arising from the noise and errors in real-world experimental tests of the KS theorem, and show that quantum mechanics also violates NCHV models under arbitrary relaxation of the so-called non-disturbance conditions. Finally, a counter-intuitive phenomenon, termed ``bound randomness'', is introduced, revealing a deep resource-theoretical relationship between non-locality and DI-certified randomness. Analogous to Werner's famous result that entanglement is not sufficient for non-locality, ``bound randomness'' indicates non-locality is not always sufficient for DI randomness certification under standard spot-checking protocols. In conclusion, this thesis introduces key techniques in contextuality and non-locality for designing targeted correlations for various DI and SDI applications.
The ontology of quantum theory, with features such as superpositions, entanglement and quantum measurements, is fascinating and radically different to that of many established physical models. It gives rise to predictions of correlations in laboratory data that distinguish quantum theory in the broader landscape of physical models. In this thesis, I broadly investigate quantum correlations in several physical scenarios with various notions of classicality. The questions considered are of a broad scope, including purely foundational matters, tasks motivated by quantum information science as well as entirely applied considerations.