Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cavity-enhanced photoionization of an ultracold rubidium beam

G. ten Haaf, Steinar H. W. Wouters, Peter H. A. Mutsaers, Edgar J. D. Vredenbregt

Published Aug 6, 2017• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Build-up cavity enhanced photoionization of ultracold atoms as a source for focused ion beams

G. ten Haaf, Steinar H. W. Wouters, D. F. J. Nijhof +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 9, 2017•0 citations

Two-stage photoionization of rubidium

Andrey N. Klyucharev, V. Yu. Sepman

Optics and Spectroscopy•Jun 1, 1975•6 citations

Two-step Selective Photoionization of Rubidium Atoms by Laser Radiation

Rafael V Ambartsumyan, В. Н. Калинин, Vladilen S Letokhov

•Mar 1, 1971•27 citations

Cavity-enhanced photoionization of an ultracold rubidium beam for application in focused ion beams

G. ten Haaf, Steinar H. W. Wouters, Peter H. A. Mutsaers +1 more

A two-step photoionization strategy of an ultracold rubidium beam for application in a focused ion beam instrument is analyzed and implemented. In this strategy the atomic beam is partly selected with an aperture after which the transmitted atoms are ionized in the overlap of a tightly cylindrically focused excitation laser beam and an ionization laser beam whose power is enhanced in a build-up cavity. The advantage of this strategy, as compared to without the use of a build-up cavity, is that higher ionization degrees can be reached at higher currents. Optical Bloch equations including the photoionization process are used to calculate what ionization degree and ionization position distribution can be reached. Furthermore, the ionization strategy is tested on an ultracold beam of $^{85}\mathrm{Rb}$ atoms. The beam current is measured as a function of the excitation and ionization laser beam intensity and the selection aperture size. Although details are different, the global trends of the measurements agree well with the calculation. With a selection aperture diameter of $52\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$, a current of $\left(170\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4\right)$ pA is measured, which according to calculations is 63% of the current equivalent of the transmitted atomic flux. Taking into account the ionization degree the ion beam peak reduced brightness is estimated at $1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{7}$ A/(${\mathrm{m}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{sr}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$).

arXiv:1708.01933•Physical Review A•Nov 13, 2017•10 citations

Measurements of the energy distribution of an ultracold rubidium ion beam

G. ten Haaf, Steinar H. W. Wouters, D. F. J. Nijhof +2 more

The energy distribution of an ultracold rubidium ion beam, which is intended to be used as the source for a focused ion beam instrument, is measured with a retarding field analyzer. The ions are created from a laser-cooled and compressed atomic beam by two-step photoionization in which the ionization laser power is enhanced in a build-up cavity. Particle tracing simulations are performed to ensure the analyzer is able to resolve the distribution. The lowest achieved full width 50% energy spread is $\left(0.205\pm0.006\right)$ eV. The energy spread originates from the variation in the ionization position of the ions which are created inside an extraction electric field. This extraction field is essential to limit disorder-induced heating which can decrease the ion beam brightness. The ionization position distribution is limited by a tightly focused excitation laser beam. Energy distributions are measured for various ionization and excitation laser intensities and compared with calculations based on numerical solutions of the optical Bloch equations including ionization. A good agreement is found between measurements and calculations.

arXiv:1710.11477•Oct 31, 2017•0 citations

Two-stage photoionization of rubidium atom. (USSR)

Vacuum•Jan 1, 1977•0 citations
A two-step photoionization strategy of an ultracold rubidium beam for application in a focused ion beam instrument is analyzed and implemented. In this strategy the atomic beam is partly selected with an aperture after which the transmitted atoms are ionized in the overlap of a tightly cylindrically focused excitation laser beam and an ionization laser beam whose power is enhanced in a build-up cavity. The advantage of this strategy, as compared to without the use of a build-up cavity, is that higher ionization degrees can be reached at higher currents. Optical Bloch equations including the photoionization process are used to calculate what ionization degree and ionization position distribution can be reached. Furthermore, the ionization strategy is tested on an ultracold beam of 85Rb^{85}\mathrm{Rb}85Rb atoms. The beam current is measured as a function of the excitation and ionization laser beam intensity and the selection aperture size. Although details are different, the global trends of the measurements agree well with the calculation. With a selection aperture diameter of $52\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$, a current of $\left(170\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4\right)$ pA is measured, which according to calculations is 63% of the current equivalent of the transmitted atomic flux. Taking into account the ionization degree the ion beam peak reduced brightness is estimated at $1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{7}$ A/(m2sreV{\mathrm{m}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{sr}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}m2sreV).
The energy distribution of an ultracold rubidium ion beam, which is intended to be used as the source for a focused ion beam instrument, is measured with a retarding field analyzer. The ions are created from a laser-cooled and compressed atomic beam by two-step photoionization in which the ionization laser power is enhanced in a build-up cavity. Particle tracing simulations are performed to ensure the analyzer is able to resolve the distribution. The lowest achieved full width 50% energy spread is (0.205±0.006)\left(0.205\pm0.006\right)(0.205±0.006) eV. The energy spread originates from the variation in the ionization position of the ions which are created inside an extraction electric field. This extraction field is essential to limit disorder-induced heating which can decrease the ion beam brightness. The ionization position distribution is limited by a tightly focused excitation laser beam. Energy distributions are measured for various ionization and excitation laser intensities and compared with calculations based on numerical solutions of the optical Bloch equations including ionization. A good agreement is found between measurements and calculations.