Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical basis for the electron spin and antisymmetry: A first-principles explanation

Ana Marı́a Cetto, Luis de la Peña, Andrea Valdés-Hernández

Published Jul 27, 2017• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Proposed physical explanation for the electron spin and related antisymmetry

Ana Maria Cetto, L. de la Peña, Andrea Valdés-Hernández

arXiv:1707.08674•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•Dec 12, 2017•5 citations

Understanding Electron Spin

Jan C. A. Boeyens

Explanation and clarification of electron spin.

Journal of Chemical Education•May 1, 1995•13 citations

Theory of Atomic Structure and Spin of Electron

Mituo Taketani, Masayuki Nagasaki

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Nov 1, 2001•0 citations

Superconducting first‐order pairing: Finite‐temperature simulations

Michael C. Böhm, Joachim Schulte

Abstract A recently developed first‐order mechanism for superconducting pairing has been extended from T = 0 K to finite temperatures. On the basis of quantum statistical considerations, we have suggested a direct pairing interaction that does not necessarily involve second‐order elements, such as the electron–phonon coupling or specific magnetic interactions submitted by spin fluctuations. The driving force for the (energy‐driven) first‐order pairing is an attenuation of the destabilizing influence of the Pauli antisymmetry principle (PAP). Only the moves of unpaired fermions are controlled by the PAP, while the moves of superconducting Cooper pairs are not. The quantum statistics of Cooper pairs is of a mixed type, as it combines fermionic on‐site and bosonic intersite properties. The strong correlation between the strength of PAP constraints and system topology in combination with the electron number has been discussed for some larger clusters. Detailed finite‐temperature simulations on first‐order pairing have been performed for four‐center–four‐electron clusters with different topologies. A canonical ensemble statistics has been employed to derive the electronic energy, the electronic configuration entropy, and the free energy of paired and unpaired states in thermal equilibrium. The simulations show that pairing can be caused by either the electronic energy or the electronic configuration entropy. The coexistence of two different sets of quantum particles in paired states (i.e., the Cooper pairs and the unpaired electrons) can lead to an enhanced configuration entropy. In this context, we discuss the possibility of an entropy‐driven high‐temperature superconductor emerging from a low‐temperature unpaired state. The charge and spin degrees of freedom of the four‐center–four‐electron systems have been studied with the help of the charge and spin fluctuations. The spin fluctuations are helpful in judging the validity of pairing theories based on magnetic interactions. The charge fluctuations are a measure for the carrier delocalization in unpaired and paired states. The well‐known proximity between Jahn–Teller activity and superconductivity is analyzed in the zero‐temperature limit. It is demonstrated that both processes compete in their ability to reduce PAP constraints. All theoretical results have been derived within the framework of the simple Hubbard Hamiltonian. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Oct 22, 2004•4 citations

Electron system correlated by the zero-point field: physical explanation for the spin-statistics connection

Ana Marı́a Cetto, Luis de la Peña

Which is the physical agent behind the antisymmetry of the electron state vectors? With the purpose to find an answer to this key question, we analyze the stationary states of a system containing two noninteracting electrons, using the tools of stochastic electrodynamics. In previous work, the resonant response of two particles to common modes of the random zero- point field has been shown to lead to the nonfactorizability of the composite state vector. Here we extend the analysis to particles with spin. When two electrons constitute a single system, a correlation is established between their dynamical variables through the common relevant modes of the zero-point field, which acts as a mediator. An analysis of the exchange properties of the bipartite state vectors obtained is shown to lead to the connection between spin and symmetry. The conclusion is that due consideration of the vacuum field in first quantization leads to the corresponding statistics for an assembly of electrons.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Mar 1, 2016•1 citation

Electron Spin and the Exclusion Principle

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Oct 1, 2009•0 citations
Abstract A recently developed first‐order mechanism for superconducting pairing has been extended from T = 0 K to finite temperatures. On the basis of quantum statistical considerations, we have suggested a direct pairing interaction that does not necessarily involve second‐order elements, such as the electron–phonon coupling or specific magnetic interactions submitted by spin fluctuations. The driving force for the (energy‐driven) first‐order pairing is an attenuation of the destabilizing influence of the Pauli antisymmetry principle (PAP). Only the moves of unpaired fermions are controlled by the PAP, while the moves of superconducting Cooper pairs are not. The quantum statistics of Cooper pairs is of a mixed type, as it combines fermionic on‐site and bosonic intersite properties. The strong correlation between the strength of PAP constraints and system topology in combination with the electron number has been discussed for some larger clusters. Detailed finite‐temperature simulations on first‐order pairing have been performed for four‐center–four‐electron clusters with different topologies. A canonical ensemble statistics has been employed to derive the electronic energy, the electronic configuration entropy, and the free energy of paired and unpaired states in thermal equilibrium. The simulations show that pairing can be caused by either the electronic energy or the electronic configuration entropy. The coexistence of two different sets of quantum particles in paired states (i.e., the Cooper pairs and the unpaired electrons) can lead to an enhanced configuration entropy. In this context, we discuss the possibility of an entropy‐driven high‐temperature superconductor emerging from a low‐temperature unpaired state. The charge and spin degrees of freedom of the four‐center–four‐electron systems have been studied with the help of the charge and spin fluctuations. The spin fluctuations are helpful in judging the validity of pairing theories based on magnetic interactions. The charge fluctuations are a measure for the carrier delocalization in unpaired and paired states. The well‐known proximity between Jahn–Teller activity and superconductivity is analyzed in the zero‐temperature limit. It is demonstrated that both processes compete in their ability to reduce PAP constraints. All theoretical results have been derived within the framework of the simple Hubbard Hamiltonian. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005
Which is the physical agent behind the antisymmetry of the electron state vectors? With the purpose to find an answer to this key question, we analyze the stationary states of a system containing two noninteracting electrons, using the tools of stochastic electrodynamics. In previous work, the resonant response of two particles to common modes of the random zero- point field has been shown to lead to the nonfactorizability of the composite state vector. Here we extend the analysis to particles with spin. When two electrons constitute a single system, a correlation is established between their dynamical variables through the common relevant modes of the zero-point field, which acts as a mediator. An analysis of the exchange properties of the bipartite state vectors obtained is shown to lead to the connection between spin and symmetry. The conclusion is that due consideration of the vacuum field in first quantization leads to the corresponding statistics for an assembly of electrons.