Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Introduction to the Principles of Quantum Mechanics

Gabriel Laufer

Published Jul 13, 1996• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Ever splitting the light! How often do they strive to divide that which, despite everything, would always remain single and whole. Goethe (quoted in Zajonc 1993) Introduction The use of electromagnetic wave theory and geometrical optics to describe propagation of light is satisfactory when there is no exchange of energy between radiation and matter. All observable characteristics – direction of propagation, polarization, diffraction, interference, the energy of radiation, and so forth – are accurately described by one of these so-called classical theories. However, with the exception of absorption by lossy media (eqn. 4.36) or the effects of dispersion (eqn. 4.22), classical theories fail to give reasons for many phenomena that have practical consequences in modern technology and that involve interaction between radiation and matter. Even the partially successful descriptions of dispersion or loss cannot explain the existence of the multitude of spectrally distinct absorption lines; cannot predict the wavelengths for absorption or the wavelengths for anomalous dispersion; cannot account for all the absorbed energy; and, most importantly, cannot predict or describe the effect of optical gain, which is closely related to absorption. Thus, the principles of operation of many important devices of modern optics such as lasers, photodiodes, electronic cameras, and television screens cannot be explained by classical theories. Even the emission by the sun or an incandescent lamp are beyond the scope of these theories. It is evident therefore that a new, modern theory is necessary – one that is either more complete than, or simply complements, the classical theories.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139174190.010

Related papers

Beginnings of Quantum Mechanics

Daniel D. Pollock

This chapter provides a basis for an insight into the nature of quantum effects. The Newtonian approach cannot explain diffraction phenomena. The wave theory of the nature of light proposed by Huygens was able to account for these phenomena as well as for geometric optics. Planck was not only able to overcome the difficulties encountered by his predecessors, but included their findings as special cases of his analysis. Planck considered that the radiating surface was composed of electric dipole oscillators, and that a relationship should exist between the energy of the radiation and the frequency of the oscillators. According to classical theory a continuous spectrum is expected when matter is excited by an arc, or spark, as in spectroscopy. It is found experimentally that only “lines”, or discrete radiations, occur when the light is diffracted. Bohr’s revolutinary ideas provided a significant portion of the bases for the modern understanding of spectra and, consequently, of atomic structure.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 1, 2020•3 citations

Preliminaries

M.S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

At the beginning of the century doubts were growing about the whole edifice of classical physics, including the laws of mechanics in their Lagrangian and Hamiltonian forms, of statistical thermodynamics, as formulated by Boltzmann and Gibbs, and of optics, namely Maxwell’s and Fresnel’s theory. Einstein proposed that electromagnetic radiation exists in discrete quanta whilst propagating in space as well as during the emission or absorption processes. Scattering by free electrons is a common interaction connected with the absorption of electromagnetic radiation. If the electromagnetic energy is large compared with the ionization energy, the atomic electron can be treated as free. The characteristic features of the scattered radiation have been explained by Compton, on the basis of an elastic collision of a photon with a free electron, where both energy and momentum are conserved. The concept of the matter wavelength holds for both relativistic and non-relativistic particles, provided that the appropriate form of momentum is used.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2020•0 citations

WAVE MECHANICS

Murray, Iii Sargent

In this book we treat the interaction of radiation with matter with special application to gain (amplifying) media typically existing in lasers. Tradition­ ally the interaction of radiation with matter is treated in terms of the index of refraction and the absorption of light, utilizing the model of electrons on springs. In Chap. 3 we show that this model is reasonable for some linear absorbing systems but is very awkward, if not outright unworkable, for a microscopic description of gain media. The essential failure of the electron-spring model is its difficulty in yielding net stimulated emission (and therefore gain) for an ensemble of systems.t In contrast, a more physically sound, quantum treatment of matter provides for the concept of population inversion and explains stimulated emission in a natural way. Hence from the very start we are compelled to base our understanding of the interaction of radiation with matter on a quantum-mechanical description of atoms. In Chaps. 1-13 a classical field interacts with quantum-mechanical atoms; in the remainder of the book, both field and atoms are treated quantum mechani­ cally.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

NEED FOR QUANTUM MECHANICS AND ITS PHYSICAL BASIS

Vishnu S. Mathur, Surendra Singh

Classical mechanics, which gives a fairly accurate description of large systems (e.g., solar system) as also of mechanical systems in our every day life, however, breaks down when applied to small (microscopic) systems such as molecules, atoms and nuclei. For example, (1) classical mechanics cannot even explain why the atoms are stable at all. A classical atom with electrons moving in circular or elliptic orbits around the nucleus would continuously radiate energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation because an accelerated charge does radiate energy. As a result the radius of the orbit would become smaller and smaller, resulting in instability of the atom. On the other hand, the atoms are found to be remarkably stable in practice. (2) Another fact of observation that classical mechanics fails to explain is wave particle duality in radiation as well as in material particles. It is well known that light exhibits the phenomena of interference, diffraction and polarization which can be easily understood on the basis of wave aspect of radiation. But light also exhibits the phenomena of photo-electric effect, Compton effect and Raman effect which can only be understood in terms of corpuscular or quantum aspect of radiation. The dual behavior of light, or radiation cannot be consistently understood on the basis of classical concepts alone or explained away by saying that light behaves as wave or particle depending on the kind of experiment we do with it (complementarity). Moreover, a beam of material particles, like electrons and neutrons, demonstrates wave-like properties (e.g., diffraction). A brief outline of phenomena that require quantum mechanics for their understanding follows.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Dec 12, 2008•0 citations

Quantum mechanics and its interpretation

Peter Holland

The nature of the problem The quantum world is inexplicable in classical terms. The predictions pertaining to the interaction of matter and light embodied in Newton's laws for the motion of particles and Maxwell's equations governing the propagation of electromagnetic fields are in flat contradiction with the experimental facts at the microscopic scale. A key feature of quantum effects is their apparent indeterminism, that individual atomic events are unpredictable, uncontrollable and literally seem to have no cause. Regularities emerge only when one considers a large ensemble of such events. This indeed is generally considered to constitute the heart of the conceptual problem posed by quantum phenomena, necessitating a fundamental revision of the deterministic classical world view. Some of the principal phenomena, among those discussed in this book, are as follows: ( a ) Self-interference: a beam of electrons sent one at a time through a barrier containing two apertures builds up through a series of localized detection events on a screen an interference pattern characteristic of waves (cf. the frontispiece and §5.1). ( b ) Tunnelling: an α-particle trapped in a nucleus can pass through a potential barrier in a manner forbidden to a classical particle (§5.3). ( c ) The stability of matter: atoms and molecules are found to exist only in certain discrete, or ‘stationary’, energy states. For this reason they do not ‘collapse’, the result predicted by classical electrodynamics. During transitions between stationary states (quantum jumps) an atom exchanges a discrete quantity of energy with the electromagnetic field (§§4.5, 7.6). […]

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 13, 1993•3 citations

The classical physics pathway

P. van der Straten, Harold J. Metcalf

Introduction While it might appear that the nineteenth-century physics presented in this chapter has no place in a topic as quantum mechanically oriented as atomic physics, this is simply not the case. The purpose of this first chapter is to try to convince the readers that the material learned in their early years of studying physics is not disjoint from modern topics, but in fact can provide a foundation for their further understanding. Other examples will occur later. The reader may be a bit surprised to see that the results of the classical description turn out to be so close to the quantum mechanical results. Where there are significant disagreements between classical and quantum descriptions, it is necessary to explain why these occur. The correspondence principle requires that in the limit of large quantum numbers the complete quantum mechanical description must agree with the classical one. It is always better to need fewer of these explanations and to be able to treat physics as a coherent whole instead of a collection of topics. The consequences of classical physics are intuitively familiar, and this is often most helpful in gaining deeper understanding. In fact, the approach taken in very many of the chapters in this book is to start with a purely classical description of a topic, and then transport it directly into the Schrödinger equation. Radiation from an accelerated charge, as treated here in the harmonic case, provides an ideal setting for such pedagogy. Even though classical mechanics is used in place of quantum mechanics, for the case of harmonic motion, the results are quite compatible. The early history of atomic physics contains many topics that are well worth reading about, especially the experimental facilities. For example, there were no electric motors, wire was not readily available, and making even a crude vacuum was an experimental tour de force. Very many textbooks have discussions of these topics, and so they will not be presented here. But the reader is warned that certain oft-repeated modern descriptions are simply wrong. Perhaps the most important notion to be gained from this chapter is that the classical description of a harmonically bound electron provides quite accurate results about the interaction between atoms and light. Of course, the utility of this description is limited because the classical harmonic oscillator has no internal structure, is infinitely deep, and has a continuous energy spectrum.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2015•0 citations
Ever splitting the light! How often do they strive to divide that which, despite everything, would always remain single and whole. Goethe (quoted in Zajonc 1993) Introduction The use of electromagnetic wave theory and geometrical optics to describe propagation of light is satisfactory when there is no exchange of energy between radiation and matter. All observable characteristics – direction of propagation, polarization, diffraction, interference, the energy of radiation, and so forth – are accurately described by one of these so-called classical theories. However, with the exception of absorption by lossy media (eqn. 4.36) or the effects of dispersion (eqn. 4.22), classical theories fail to give reasons for many phenomena that have practical consequences in modern technology and that involve interaction between radiation and matter. Even the partially successful descriptions of dispersion or loss cannot explain the existence of the multitude of spectrally distinct absorption lines; cannot predict the wavelengths for absorption or the wavelengths for anomalous dispersion; cannot account for all the absorbed energy; and, most importantly, cannot predict or describe the effect of optical gain, which is closely related to absorption. Thus, the principles of operation of many important devices of modern optics such as lasers, photodiodes, electronic cameras, and television screens cannot be explained by classical theories. Even the emission by the sun or an incandescent lamp are beyond the scope of these theories. It is evident therefore that a new, modern theory is necessary – one that is either more complete than, or simply complements, the classical theories.
This chapter provides a basis for an insight into the nature of quantum effects. The Newtonian approach cannot explain diffraction phenomena. The wave theory of the nature of light proposed by Huygens was able to account for these phenomena as well as for geometric optics. Planck was not only able to overcome the difficulties encountered by his predecessors, but included their findings as special cases of his analysis. Planck considered that the radiating surface was composed of electric dipole oscillators, and that a relationship should exist between the energy of the radiation and the frequency of the oscillators. According to classical theory a continuous spectrum is expected when matter is excited by an arc, or spark, as in spectroscopy. It is found experimentally that only “lines”, or discrete radiations, occur when the light is diffracted. Bohr’s revolutinary ideas provided a significant portion of the bases for the modern understanding of spectra and, consequently, of atomic structure.
At the beginning of the century doubts were growing about the whole edifice of classical physics, including the laws of mechanics in their Lagrangian and Hamiltonian forms, of statistical thermodynamics, as formulated by Boltzmann and Gibbs, and of optics, namely Maxwell’s and Fresnel’s theory. Einstein proposed that electromagnetic radiation exists in discrete quanta whilst propagating in space as well as during the emission or absorption processes. Scattering by free electrons is a common interaction connected with the absorption of electromagnetic radiation. If the electromagnetic energy is large compared with the ionization energy, the atomic electron can be treated as free. The characteristic features of the scattered radiation have been explained by Compton, on the basis of an elastic collision of a photon with a free electron, where both energy and momentum are conserved. The concept of the matter wavelength holds for both relativistic and non-relativistic particles, provided that the appropriate form of momentum is used.
In this book we treat the interaction of radiation with matter with special application to gain (amplifying) media typically existing in lasers. Tradition­ ally the interaction of radiation with matter is treated in terms of the index of refraction and the absorption of light, utilizing the model of electrons on springs. In Chap. 3 we show that this model is reasonable for some linear absorbing systems but is very awkward, if not outright unworkable, for a microscopic description of gain media. The essential failure of the electron-spring model is its difficulty in yielding net stimulated emission (and therefore gain) for an ensemble of systems.t In contrast, a more physically sound, quantum treatment of matter provides for the concept of population inversion and explains stimulated emission in a natural way. Hence from the very start we are compelled to base our understanding of the interaction of radiation with matter on a quantum-mechanical description of atoms. In Chaps. 1-13 a classical field interacts with quantum-mechanical atoms; in the remainder of the book, both field and atoms are treated quantum mechani­ cally.
Classical mechanics, which gives a fairly accurate description of large systems (e.g., solar system) as also of mechanical systems in our every day life, however, breaks down when applied to small (microscopic) systems such as molecules, atoms and nuclei. For example, (1) classical mechanics cannot even explain why the atoms are stable at all. A classical atom with electrons moving in circular or elliptic orbits around the nucleus would continuously radiate energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation because an accelerated charge does radiate energy. As a result the radius of the orbit would become smaller and smaller, resulting in instability of the atom. On the other hand, the atoms are found to be remarkably stable in practice. (2) Another fact of observation that classical mechanics fails to explain is wave particle duality in radiation as well as in material particles. It is well known that light exhibits the phenomena of interference, diffraction and polarization which can be easily understood on the basis of wave aspect of radiation. But light also exhibits the phenomena of photo-electric effect, Compton effect and Raman effect which can only be understood in terms of corpuscular or quantum aspect of radiation. The dual behavior of light, or radiation cannot be consistently understood on the basis of classical concepts alone or explained away by saying that light behaves as wave or particle depending on the kind of experiment we do with it (complementarity). Moreover, a beam of material particles, like electrons and neutrons, demonstrates wave-like properties (e.g., diffraction). A brief outline of phenomena that require quantum mechanics for their understanding follows.
The nature of the problem The quantum world is inexplicable in classical terms. The predictions pertaining to the interaction of matter and light embodied in Newton's laws for the motion of particles and Maxwell's equations governing the propagation of electromagnetic fields are in flat contradiction with the experimental facts at the microscopic scale. A key feature of quantum effects is their apparent indeterminism, that individual atomic events are unpredictable, uncontrollable and literally seem to have no cause. Regularities emerge only when one considers a large ensemble of such events. This indeed is generally considered to constitute the heart of the conceptual problem posed by quantum phenomena, necessitating a fundamental revision of the deterministic classical world view. Some of the principal phenomena, among those discussed in this book, are as follows: ( a ) Self-interference: a beam of electrons sent one at a time through a barrier containing two apertures builds up through a series of localized detection events on a screen an interference pattern characteristic of waves (cf. the frontispiece and §5.1). ( b ) Tunnelling: an α-particle trapped in a nucleus can pass through a potential barrier in a manner forbidden to a classical particle (§5.3). ( c ) The stability of matter: atoms and molecules are found to exist only in certain discrete, or ‘stationary’, energy states. For this reason they do not ‘collapse’, the result predicted by classical electrodynamics. During transitions between stationary states (quantum jumps) an atom exchanges a discrete quantity of energy with the electromagnetic field (§§4.5, 7.6). […]
Introduction While it might appear that the nineteenth-century physics presented in this chapter has no place in a topic as quantum mechanically oriented as atomic physics, this is simply not the case. The purpose of this first chapter is to try to convince the readers that the material learned in their early years of studying physics is not disjoint from modern topics, but in fact can provide a foundation for their further understanding. Other examples will occur later. The reader may be a bit surprised to see that the results of the classical description turn out to be so close to the quantum mechanical results. Where there are significant disagreements between classical and quantum descriptions, it is necessary to explain why these occur. The correspondence principle requires that in the limit of large quantum numbers the complete quantum mechanical description must agree with the classical one. It is always better to need fewer of these explanations and to be able to treat physics as a coherent whole instead of a collection of topics. The consequences of classical physics are intuitively familiar, and this is often most helpful in gaining deeper understanding. In fact, the approach taken in very many of the chapters in this book is to start with a purely classical description of a topic, and then transport it directly into the Schrödinger equation. Radiation from an accelerated charge, as treated here in the harmonic case, provides an ideal setting for such pedagogy. Even though classical mechanics is used in place of quantum mechanics, for the case of harmonic motion, the results are quite compatible. The early history of atomic physics contains many topics that are well worth reading about, especially the experimental facilities. For example, there were no electric motors, wire was not readily available, and making even a crude vacuum was an experimental tour de force. Very many textbooks have discussions of these topics, and so they will not be presented here. But the reader is warned that certain oft-repeated modern descriptions are simply wrong. Perhaps the most important notion to be gained from this chapter is that the classical description of a harmonically bound electron provides quite accurate results about the interaction between atoms and light. Of course, the utility of this description is limited because the classical harmonic oscillator has no internal structure, is infinitely deep, and has a continuous energy spectrum.