Reichenbach's principle asserts that if two observed variables are found to be correlated, then there should be a causal explanation of these correlations.Furthermore, if the explanation is in terms of a common cause, then the conditional probability distribution over the variables given the complete common cause should factorize.The principle is generalized by the formalism of causal models, in which the causal relationships among variables constrain the form of their joint probability distribution.In the quantum case, however, the observed correlations in Bell experiments cannot be explained in the manner Reichenbach's principle would seem to demand.Motivated by this, we introduce a quantum counterpart to the principle.We demonstrate that under the assumption that quantum dynamics is fundamentally unitary, if a quantum channel with input A and outputs B and C is compatible with A being a complete common cause of B and C, then it must factorize in a particular way.Finally, we show how to generalize our quantum version of Reichenbach's principle to a formalism for quantum causal models and provide examples of how the formalism works.Reichenbach's principle asserts that if two observed variables are found to be correlated, then there should be a causal explanation of these correlations.Furthermore, if the explanation is in terms of a common cause, then the conditional probability distribution over the variables given the complete common cause should factorize.The principle is generalized by the formalism of causal models, in which the causal relationships among variables constrain the form of their joint probability distribution.In the quantum case, however, the observed correlations in Bell experiments cannot be explained in the manner Reichenbach's principle would seem to demand.Motivated by this, we introduce a quantum counterpart to the principle.We demonstrate that under the assumption that quantum dynamics is fundamentally unitary, if a quantum channel with input A and outputs B and C is compatible with A being a complete common cause of B and C, then it must factorize in a particular way.Finally, we show how to generalize our quantum version of Reichenbach's principle to a formalism for quantum causal models and provide examples of how the formalism works.

arXiv:1609.09487Physical Review XJul 31, 2017213 citations

On modifications of Reichenbachʼs principle of common cause in light of Bellʼs theorem

Eric G. Cavalcanti, Raymond Lal

Bellʼs 1964 theorem causes a severe problem for the notion that correlations require explanation, encapsulated in Reichenbachʼs principle of common cause. Despite being a hallmark of scientific thought, dropping the principle has been widely regarded as much less bitter medicine than the perceived alternative—dropping relativistic causality. Recently, however, some authors have proposed that modified forms of Reichenbachʼs principle could be maintained even with relativistic causality. Here we break down Reichenbachʼs principle into two independent assumptions—the principle of common cause proper and factorization of probabilities . We show how Bellʼs theorem can be derived from these two assumptions plus relativistic causality and the law of total probability for actual events, and we review proposals to drop each of these assumptions in light of the theorem. In particular, we show that the non-commutative common causes of Hofer-Szabó and Vecsernyés fail to have an analogue of the notion that the common causes can explain the observed correlations. Moreover, we show that their definition can be satisfied trivially by any quantum product state for any quantum correlations. We also discuss how the conditional states approach of Leifer and Spekkens fares in this regard. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to ‘50 years of Bell’s theorem’.Bellʼs 1964 theorem causes a severe problem for the notion that correlations require explanation, encapsulated in Reichenbachʼs principle of common cause. Despite being a hallmark of scientific thought, dropping the principle has been widely regarded as much less bitter medicine than the perceived alternative—dropping relativistic causality. Recently, however, some authors have proposed that modified forms of Reichenbachʼs principle could be maintained even with relativistic causality. Here we break down Reichenbachʼs principle into two independent assumptions—the principle of common cause proper and factorization of probabilities . We show how Bellʼs theorem can be derived from these two assumptions plus relativistic causality and the law of total probability for actual events, and we review proposals to drop each of these assumptions in light of the theorem. In particular, we show that the non-commutative common causes of Hofer-Szabó and Vecsernyés fail to have an analogue of the notion that the common causes can explain the observed correlations. Moreover, we show that their definition can be satisfied trivially by any quantum product state for any quantum correlations. We also discuss how the conditional states approach of Leifer and Spekkens fares in this regard. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to ‘50 years of Bell’s theorem’.

arXiv:1311.6852Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalOct 9, 201466 citations

Discrimination between quantum common causes and quantum causality

Mingdi Hu, Yuexian Hou

In classic cases, Reichenbach's principle implies that discriminating between common causes and causality is unprincipled since the discriminative results essentially depend on the selection of possible conditional variables. For some typical quantum cases, K. Reid et al. [Nat. Phys. 11, 414 (2015)] presented the statistic $C$ which can effectively discriminate quantum common causes and quantum causality over two quantum random variables (i.e., qubits) and which only uses measurement information about these two variables. In this paper, we formalize general quantum common causes and general quantum causality. Based on the formal representation, we further investigate their decidability via the statistic $C$ in general quantum cases. We demonstrate that (i) $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}1,\frac{1}{27}\right]$ if two qubits are influenced by quantum common causes; (ii) $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{27},1\right]$ if the relation between two qubits is quantum causality; (iii) a geometric picture can illuminate the geometric interpretation of the probabilistic mixture of quantum common causes and quantum causality. This geometric picture also provides a basic heuristic to develop more complete methods for discriminating the cases corresponding to $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{27},\frac{1}{27}\right]$. Our results demonstrate that quantum common causes and quantum causality can be discriminated in a considerable scope.In classic cases, Reichenbach's principle implies that discriminating between common causes and causality is unprincipled since the discriminative results essentially depend on the selection of possible conditional variables. For some typical quantum cases, K. Reid et al. [Nat. Phys. 11, 414 (2015)] presented the statistic $C$ which can effectively discriminate quantum common causes and quantum causality over two quantum random variables (i.e., qubits) and which only uses measurement information about these two variables. In this paper, we formalize general quantum common causes and general quantum causality. Based on the formal representation, we further investigate their decidability via the statistic $C$ in general quantum cases. We demonstrate that (i) $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}1,\frac{1}{27}\right]$ if two qubits are influenced by quantum common causes; (ii) $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{27},1\right]$ if the relation between two qubits is quantum causality; (iii) a geometric picture can illuminate the geometric interpretation of the probabilistic mixture of quantum common causes and quantum causality. This geometric picture also provides a basic heuristic to develop more complete methods for discriminating the cases corresponding to $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{27},\frac{1}{27}\right]$. Our results demonstrate that quantum common causes and quantum causality can be discriminated in a considerable scope.

arXiv:1806.10048Physical Review AJun 26, 201810 citations

Reichenbach’s causal completeness of quantum probability spaces

Dominika Burešová, Kamila Houšková, Mirko Navara +3 more

Abstract Reichenbach’s common cause principle (RCCP) is a metaphysical claim about the causal structure of the world. It entails that all correlations can be explained causally either by pointing at the causal connection between the correlated entities or by displaying a common cause of the correlation. We contribute to its mathematical side. Firstly, after adopting the RCCP axioms, we indicate the importance of positive covariance of events in connection with RCCP. In fact, RCCP is meaningful only for positively correlated events. Secondly, we find explicit requirements for a state to have a common cause in a quantum logic. Afterwards, we compare RCCP in the standard (Boolean) case and in the quantum setup that admits new properties of correlation, impossible in the classical case. We show that the notion of maximal correlation differs considerably in these two cases. We answer an open question by providing a counterexample based on a quantum logic given by a free orthomodular lattice. Subsequently, we find a relation between the Darboux property and RCCP. We invent a new technique for obtaining the central result that atomless σ-complete quantum logics are common cause complete. A variety of new examples is presented. Finally, we contribute to a fundamental question whether a common cause incomplete quantum logic can be embedded into one that is common cause complete. We contribute by an advanced construction that allows for a positive answer to this question for quantum logics with finitely many atoms and even for some quantum logics with countably many atoms.Abstract Reichenbach’s common cause principle (RCCP) is a metaphysical claim about the causal structure of the world. It entails that all correlations can be explained causally either by pointing at the causal connection between the correlated entities or by displaying a common cause of the correlation. We contribute to its mathematical side. Firstly, after adopting the RCCP axioms, we indicate the importance of positive covariance of events in connection with RCCP. In fact, RCCP is meaningful only for positively correlated events. Secondly, we find explicit requirements for a state to have a common cause in a quantum logic. Afterwards, we compare RCCP in the standard (Boolean) case and in the quantum setup that admits new properties of correlation, impossible in the classical case. We show that the notion of maximal correlation differs considerably in these two cases. We answer an open question by providing a counterexample based on a quantum logic given by a free orthomodular lattice. Subsequently, we find a relation between the Darboux property and RCCP. We invent a new technique for obtaining the central result that atomless σ-complete quantum logics are common cause complete. A variety of new examples is presented. Finally, we contribute to a fundamental question whether a common cause incomplete quantum logic can be embedded into one that is common cause complete. We contribute by an advanced construction that allows for a positive answer to this question for quantum logics with finitely many atoms and even for some quantum logics with countably many atoms.

Mathematica SlovacaAug 1, 20252 citations

A missing causal principle: Coordination

Daniel Centeno, Antoine Coquet, Maria Ciudad Alañón +3 more

We introduce the coordination principle, which states that perfect coordination, in the form of agreement on a uniformly random output, among N parties is possible only if they share a common cause. This principle is purely causal and can be viewed as a multipartite generalization of Reichenbach's common cause principle. We prove that quantum information theory satisfy the coordination principle in any network, and derive noise-tolerant Bell-like inequalities that certify the presence of a common cause. We further show that the principle is not a consequence of no-signaling and independence alone by constructing a concrete operational probabilistic theory that obeys both principles while still allowing perfect coordination without a common cause. This possibility arises only in fully general causal scenarios with intermediate transformations between preparations and measurements. We also formulate a genuinely quantum coordination task, showing that the preparation of a multipartite GHZ state requires a quantum common cause, which can be certified by Bell-like inequalities which are experimentally testable. Finally, we discuss the open problem of finding a quantitative, noise-tolerant version of the coordination principle that constrains approximate coordination in any reasonable causal theory. This work is the extended version of the more compact letter and provides all the technical details of the proofs.We introduce the coordination principle, which states that perfect coordination, in the form of agreement on a uniformly random output, among N parties is possible only if they share a common cause. This principle is purely causal and can be viewed as a multipartite generalization of Reichenbach's common cause principle. We prove that quantum information theory satisfy the coordination principle in any network, and derive noise-tolerant Bell-like inequalities that certify the presence of a common cause. We further show that the principle is not a consequence of no-signaling and independence alone by constructing a concrete operational probabilistic theory that obeys both principles while still allowing perfect coordination without a common cause. This possibility arises only in fully general causal scenarios with intermediate transformations between preparations and measurements. We also formulate a genuinely quantum coordination task, showing that the preparation of a multipartite GHZ state requires a quantum common cause, which can be certified by Bell-like inequalities which are experimentally testable. Finally, we discuss the open problem of finding a quantitative, noise-tolerant version of the coordination principle that constrains approximate coordination in any reasonable causal theory. This work is the extended version of the more compact letter and provides all the technical details of the proofs.

quant-pharXiv:2605.03132May 6, 20260 citations

REICHENBACH'S COMMON CAUSE PRINCIPLE AND QUANTUM CORRELATIONS

Miklós Rédel

Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle is the claim that if two events are correlated, then either there is a causal connection between the correlated events that is responsible for the correlation or there is a third event, a so called (Reichenbachian) common cause, which brings about the correlation. The paper reviews some results concerning Reichenbach's notion of common cause, results that are directly relevant to the problem of how one can falsifY Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle. Special emphasis will be put on the question of whether EPR-type correlations can have an explanation in terms of Reichenbachian common causes. Most of the results to be recalled indicate that falsifYing Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle is much more tricky than one may have thought and that, contrary to some claims in the literature, there is no conclusive proof yet that the EPR correlations predicted by ordinary, non-relativistic quantum mechanics cannot have a common cause; furthermore, recent results about possible Reichenbachian common causes of correlations predicted by quantum field states between spacelike separated local observable algebras in algebraic quantum field theory strongly indicate that there may very well exist Reichenbachian common causes of superluminal correlations predicted by quantum field theory.Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle is the claim that if two events are correlated, then either there is a causal connection between the correlated events that is responsible for the correlation or there is a third event, a so called (Reichenbachian) common cause, which brings about the correlation. The paper reviews some results concerning Reichenbach's notion of common cause, results that are directly relevant to the problem of how one can falsifY Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle. Special emphasis will be put on the question of whether EPR-type correlations can have an explanation in terms of Reichenbachian common causes. Most of the results to be recalled indicate that falsifYing Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle is much more tricky than one may have thought and that, contrary to some claims in the literature, there is no conclusive proof yet that the EPR correlations predicted by ordinary, non-relativistic quantum mechanics cannot have a common cause; furthermore, recent results about possible Reichenbachian common causes of correlations predicted by quantum field states between spacelike separated local observable algebras in algebraic quantum field theory strongly indicate that there may very well exist Reichenbachian common causes of superluminal correlations predicted by quantum field theory.

Jan 1, 20111 citation

C

which can effectively discriminate quantum common causes and quantum causality over two quantum random variables (i.e., qubits) and which only uses measurement information about these two variables. In this paper, we formalize general quantum common causes and general quantum causality. Based on the formal representation, we further investigate their decidability via the statistic

C

in general quantum cases. We demonstrate that (i) $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}1,\frac{1}{27}\right]$ if two qubits are influenced by quantum common causes; (ii) $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{27},1\right]$ if the relation between two qubits is quantum causality; (iii) a geometric picture can illuminate the geometric interpretation of the probabilistic mixture of quantum common causes and quantum causality. This geometric picture also provides a basic heuristic to develop more complete methods for discriminating the cases corresponding to $C\ensuremath{\in}\left[\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{27},\frac{1}{27}\right]$. Our results demonstrate that quantum common causes and quantum causality can be discriminated in a considerable scope.