Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Reply to Comment on Electromagnetic Wave Dynamics in Matter-Wave Superradiant Scattering by Wolfgang Ketterle

L. Deng, E. W. Hagley, Marvin G. Payne

Published Mar 18, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Comment on “Electromagnetic Wave Dynamics in Matter-Wave Superradiant Scattering”

Wolfgang Ketterle

A Comment on the Letter by L. Deng, M. G. Payne, and E. W. Hagley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 050402 (2010). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Physical Review Letters•Mar 15, 2011•6 citations

Reply to “Comment on “Role of matter interactions in superradiant phenomena””

J. P. Mendonça, K. Jachymski, Y. Wang

Physical Review Letters•Oct 26, 2026•0 citations

Coherent manipulation of light and matter waves with superradiant Raman scattering

豊 吉川

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Reply to Comment by Wolfgang Ketterle on "Electromagnetic Wave Dynamics in Matter-Wave Superradiant Scattering" (see arXiv:1010.3915)

L. Deng, E. W. Hagley, M. G. Payne

The Comment by Wolfgang Ketterle (Ref.[1]) purports to present a viable model of superradiance in condensates. However, Ref.[1] is not able to explain the red/blue pump detuning asymmetry that was first observed recently by us (Ref.[2]). It is clear from our original paper (Ref.[3]) that the rate-equation-based theories of Ref.[1] are incomplete since they only model the final growth stage of the process when a red-detuned pump is used. Our theoretical framework (Ref.[3]), on the other hand, also treats the initial growth stage of superradiance and is therefore also capable of explaining the genesis of the red/blue detuning asymmetry (Ref.[2]). This is the key message of our response, which we frame in terms of reference to the specific points raised in Ref. [1].

arXiv:1011.0205•Oct 31, 2010•0 citations

Super- and subradiant dynamics of quantum emitters mediated by atomic matter waves

Youngshin Kim, Alfonso Lanuza, Dominik Schneble

arXiv:2311.09474•Nature Physics•Nov 18, 2024•9 citations

Deng, Payne, and Hagley Reply:

L. Deng, M. G. Payne, E. W. Hagley

A Reply to the Comment by Wolfgang Ketterle.Received 1 November 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.118902© 2011 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 15, 2011•4 citations
The Comment by Wolfgang Ketterle (Ref.[1]) purports to present a viable model of superradiance in condensates. However, Ref.[1] is not able to explain the red/blue pump detuning asymmetry that was first observed recently by us (Ref.[2]). It is clear from our original paper (Ref.[3]) that the rate-equation-based theories of Ref.[1] are incomplete since they only model the final growth stage of the process when a red-detuned pump is used. Our theoretical framework (Ref.[3]), on the other hand, also treats the initial growth stage of superradiance and is therefore also capable of explaining the genesis of the red/blue detuning asymmetry (Ref.[2]). This is the key message of our response, which we frame in terms of reference to the specific points raised in Ref. [1].