Applying the concept of quantum hydrodynamics on a hydrogen atom, one can derive an equation of motion which describes the time derivative of the mass current density for the relative motion of the electron and the proton. Since this derivation can be performed with the Ehrenfest theorem, we call this equation the Ehrenfest equation of motion. As quantum hydrodynamics is consistent with Schrödinger's quantum mechanics, the stationary s-wave functions satisfy both the Schrödinger equation and the Ehrenfest equation of motion. It is the purpose of this paper to prove that the stationary s-wave functions satisfy the Ehrenfest equation of motion. From the quantum hydrodynamical point of view, this result for s-wave functions can be interpreted that the Coulomb force density that attracts the electron to the proton is compensated by a quantum force density that is related to the dispersion of the probability density.
Applying the concept of quantum hydrodynamics on a hydrogen atom, one can derive an equation of motion which describes the time derivative of the mass current density for the relative motion of the electron and the proton. Since this derivation can be performed with the Ehrenfest theorem, we call this equation the Ehrenfest equation of motion. As quantum hydrodynamics is consistent with Schrödinger's quantum mechanics, the stationary s-wave functions satisfy both the Schrödinger equation and the Ehrenfest equation of motion. It is the purpose of this paper to prove that the stationary s-wave functions satisfy the Ehrenfest equation of motion. From the quantum hydrodynamical point of view, this result for s-wave functions can be interpreted that the Coulomb force density that attracts the electron to the proton is compensated by a quantum force density that is related to the dispersion of the probability density.
The Eherenfest theorem states that Schrodinger representation of quantum mechanics (wave mechanics) reproduces Newton laws of motion in terms of expectation values. Remarkably, the contrary is considered elusive and, indeed, many authors have tried to obtain wave mechanics starting from other alternative frameworks of classical mechanics (for instance, Hamilton-Jacobi theory). Despite this common opinion, we present here a simple method to make Newtonian dynamics develop naturally into Schrodinger representation. The proof is based on the assumption of matter waves and is laid out in three fundamental steps. First, the role of classical density functions is underlined in view of their use to define constants of the motion for massive particles. Thanks to this preparatory step, density functions generate wave functions whose spatial and time variables obey Newton laws of motion. The resulting wave equation is defined in dependence on a parameter that plays the identical role of the constant K introduced by Schrodinger in the original formulation of his theory. In the final step, the classical wave equation is treated under the hypothesis of conservative forces common to the Eherenfest theorem and, after some algebra, the Schrodinger equation emerges by means of the identification of the classical momentum with de Broglie momentum of matter waves.
Many-body quantum-mechanical stationary states that have real valued wavefunctions are shown to satisfy a classical conservation of energy equation with a kinetic energy function. The terms in the equation depend on the probability distribution, and, in addition, pressure and velocity functions, but these functions also depend on the probability distribution. There are two possible directions of the velocity that satisfy the energy equation. A linear momentum function is defined that integrates to zero, and this property is consistent with the expectation value of the linear momentum for stationary states with real-valued wave functions. The energy equation is integrated to obtain a version of the well known energy equation involving reduced density matrices, where the kinetic energy functional of the one-particle density matrix is replaced by a function of the electron density and a velocity function. Also, the noninteracting kinetic energy functional from the Hohenberg--Kohn theorem is given as an explicit functional of the orbital densities. For the purpose of describing the behavior of particles in a stationary state, a model based on the energy equation is constructed. The model is evaluated for the two different velocity directions using the grounds state of the particle in a one-dimensional box and the hydrogen atom. For one velocity direction, equations of motions with contradictory properties are obtained, and, in the other, an unstable system is found. A discussion is given with suggestions of additional elements that might improve the model.
The hydrogen atom can be considered a two-particle system, an electron and a proton, with the Coulomb potential acting between them. This chapter shows how to solve the Schrodinger equation for the wave function of the two-particle system. It introduces the coordinates of the center of mass, which will allow us to split the Schrodinger equation into two independent equations, one for the center of mass motion and another for the relative motion of the electron and proton. The left- hand side of the Schrodinger equation depends solely on the spatial variables, whereas the right-hand side depends solely on time. The wave function can be written as a product of the spatial and time-dependent parts. It is very similar in form to the Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom except it involves two Laplacians. Since the Laplacians act on separate variables, the chapter helps to solve the Schrodinger equation using the method of separate variables.
Even after nine decades of successful run of the Quantum Mechanics (QM), different viewpoints on foundational problems of Quantum Physics are still being actively debated. That is because mathematical logic of QM often defies the physical intuition which constitutes the main spirit of Physics. De Broglie’s hypothesis of matter waves implied that the dynamic characteristics of a micro particle in motion, can be ascribed to the wave characteristics of the wavelet accompanying the particle. The Schrödinger equation models the matter-wave interactions through wavefunction ψ and effectively serves as the foundation of QM. Even though mathematical structure of the Schrödinger equation is sound and elegant, here we show a conceptual mistake in the development of this equation wherein the physical situation has not been correctly modeled in the equation. The Coulomb potential energy of the proton electron pair in Hydrogen atom is essentially the negative interaction energy between their superposed electrostatic fields which is inversely proportional to their instantaneous separation distance. Assuming the proton to be relatively fixed at the origin of an appropriate coordinate system, the potential energy of the orbiting electron will be a function of instantaneous position coordinates of the electron. This has not been properly modeled in the Schrödinger equation. The resulting errors in the solution have been quantitatively demonstrated in this paper. We have stressed the necessity of incorporating a specific correction in the potential energy term of the Schrödinger equation, after which it may facilitate the adoption of Bohmian QM.
Introducing a dimensional unit \hbar into classical mechanics, we make classical wave functions √ρ1exp (iS1/\hbar)-√ρ2exp (iS2/\hbar) for a one-particle system in the configuration space where √ρ1exp (iS1/\hbar) corresponds to the incident path (or one half) of an orbit and √ρ2exp (iS2/\hbar) to the outgoing (or another half), and ρ's and S's are densities and actions respectively. These classical wave functions are compared with the corresponding wave functions of solutions of the Schrödinger equation for three one-particle systems, the scattering by a Coulomb potential, the linear harmonic oscillator and an electron bound by a Coulomb potential. From the essential correspondence between them it is concluded that the Schrödinger wave function describes the steady, causal but a little imaginary motion of the one-particle system as √ρexp (iS/\hbar) in the configuration space where ρ is a density and S an action, and that the states which the wave equation describes exist continuously (not discrete) and the (discrete) stationary states are the ones where √ρexp (iS/\hbar) is uniquely determined throughout an orbit. The Dirac equation shows that an electron of optics (or the electromagnetic wave equation) can be considered as the Schrödinger (or Dirac) equation for the motion of a photon, a particle, in a potential. A quantum-electrodynamical wave equation which is composed of the Dirac equation with a Coulomb potential and the electromagnetic wave equation is constructed for the steady motion of a one-electron system without recource to the so-called second-quantization method. It gives finite energy shifts. A line shift is calculated: ΔE(2S1/2 →2P1/2) \cong709 Mc/s.
Based on the Ehrenfest theorem, the time-dependent expectation value of a momentum operator can be evaluated equivalently in two ways. The integrals appearing in the expressions are taken over two different functions. In one case, the integrand is the quantum mechanical flux density j̲, and in the other, a different quantity j̲̃ appears, which also has the units of a flux density. The quantum flux density j̲ is related to the probability density ρ via the continuity equation, and j̲̃ may as well be used to define a density ρ̃ that fulfills a continuity equation. Employing a model for the coupled dynamics of an electron and a proton, we document the properties of the densities and flux densities. It is shown that although the mean momentum derived from the two quantities is identical, the various functions exhibit a very different coordinate and time-dependence. In particular, it is found that the flux density j̲̃ directly monitors temporal changes in the probability density, and the density ρ̃ carries information about wave packet dispersion occurring in different spatial directions.